Kill of a brand new 5.0 tang
12-05-2011, 10:17 PM
#442
TECH Addict
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In that case, you're used to driving a slower car, so you simply lied because you're a hater... 
You should go troll elsewhere. Our forums are "all full up" with dumbass and wannabe already.
Don't go wasting everyone's time exclaiming how you always beat new 5.0's in your stock WS6 either... We know they're quicker than stock 4th gens. They're notably quicker, at that. They also handle much better and feel and look far less "cheap" than any F-body since 1972...
Simply stated, the new Mustang GT (in any variation) is more performance oriented than the 4th gen. Anyone who test drove a new MGT and thinks it's slow or cheap... or junk as compared to any 4th gen...
must be sleeping and having a good dream. Sadly, reality awaits their waking moment. 
You should go troll elsewhere. Our forums are "all full up" with dumbass and wannabe already.
Don't go wasting everyone's time exclaiming how you always beat new 5.0's in your stock WS6 either... We know they're quicker than stock 4th gens. They're notably quicker, at that. They also handle much better and feel and look far less "cheap" than any F-body since 1972...
Simply stated, the new Mustang GT (in any variation) is more performance oriented than the 4th gen. Anyone who test drove a new MGT and thinks it's slow or cheap... or junk as compared to any 4th gen...
must be sleeping and having a good dream. Sadly, reality awaits their waking moment. 
12-06-2011, 12:23 AM
#444
12-06-2011, 01:47 PM
#445
Staging Lane
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tucker, Georgia
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-06-2011, 02:34 PM
#449
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That race went exactly as expected...all things equal, the 6.1 SRT-8 is slower than the Camaro SS, which is a little slower than the Mustang GT. Had this been a 392 Challenger, it would probably have ended up out front.
12-06-2011, 03:07 PM
#450
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Had it been a 392 Callenger, it would of lost to the GT500 and the ZL-1.
12-06-2011, 06:17 PM
#454
Can we just let this thread die? Every time I see the title, It annoys the living hell out of me. Tang...
So now you have to own an F-body to post on a car related Public Forum? What if you had one? What if you are looking to purchase one?
So now you have to own an F-body to post on a car related Public Forum? What if you had one? What if you are looking to purchase one?
12-06-2011, 06:32 PM
#456
Teching In
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Harker Heights, TX
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I meant at about 1:28 but now that I look at it it seems more like shifting. 392 isn't much more than the old 6.1 price wise. I'd take the 5.0 too, especially yours
Sweet, hope I'm not 1 of the 7 since I have an 86 firebird(not sure if you can see my sig since I'm posting mobile
Sweet, hope I'm not 1 of the 7 since I have an 86 firebird(not sure if you can see my sig since I'm posting mobile
12-06-2011, 06:52 PM
#458
TECH Enthusiast
