He couldnt leave me alone......
#41
#42
Well lets assume your car make in the neighborhood of 330-340 rwhp (ford guy guessing ls1 numbers not good) and from 60 to 120 you put 4.5 cars on him. Just a guess says he is around 290-300 rwhp which would put him on par with a bolt on 05-10 gt and i dont think a 2v gt would keep it anywhere near that close with you. I bet that mustang would have been a decent race for the vette with the vette pulling a couple cars in the 60-120 race. Thats my completely unverified no baseline of facts stone guess math.
#43
also last i checked 430 rwhp> 308 rwhp lol, I think he could be the one having fun with you. Not sure what logic you stang guys use before talking smack, but someone had to check you.
#47
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Not really....he's scratchin his almost bald head wondering if he can keep up with a bolt-on ls6......lmao!
The fox notch I weighed with a tube k, no ac, skinnies and aluminum heads was 29xx. He did have some extra junk in his car but not alot.
The fox notch I weighed with a tube k, no ac, skinnies and aluminum heads was 29xx. He did have some extra junk in his car but not alot.
#48
I have no probs with it. Add a Whipple/KB/ Vortech and/or N2O and your set. Engine is good to ~900hp with the weak point being the pistons. I dont see why its a bad choice? Please elaborate.
#49
#50
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
I have no problem with it dude...lighten up.
Typical ford guy you are....well if I do this , this and this and I'm good......'cause no one else can mod up. 900 hp is a little steep....there has been plenty let go @ less than 650.
Typical ford guy you are....well if I do this , this and this and I'm good......'cause no one else can mod up. 900 hp is a little steep....there has been plenty let go @ less than 650.
#52
I see what you did there I was like??? Then I was like !!! Now I am like...
#54
#56
#57
I will build you one. im in the middle of my second one now. pm me for info if interested
#58
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've often wondered how the 4 eyed cars were lighter than the aero cars. I've owned both and know that the 4 eyed cars have more metal in them where the aero cars have more plastic.
#59
smaller brakes, smaller 7.5 rear except 86s had 8.8. less quarter glass, smaller mouldings, dash is lighter, no radio amplifier.even the seats are lighter alot of little stuff over looked.
Last edited by 92cobranotch; 01-17-2012 at 08:47 AM.