2003 Z06 full bolt ons vs 2011 5.0 full bolt ons
01-23-2012, 03:40 PM
#23
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montgomery, TX
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only things I could bolt on would be a pulley and a fast set up, which would be pointless on my car as is. And putting a pulley on would also be retarted without doing a cam swap. You also have 3.90's, I have the stock 3.42's. I still consider my car 'full bolt ons'
01-23-2012, 03:47 PM
#25
The only things I could bolt on would be a pulley and a fast set up, which would be pointless on my car as is. And putting a pulley on would also be retarted without doing a cam swap. You also have 3.90's, I have the stock 3.42's. I still consider my car 'full bolt ons'
EWP
Gears
25% UD pulley
Whether it would be retarded to do any of them or only 5-10Rwhp for X,XXX$..... It is still bolt ons you don't have that would make your car faster.
Consider it whatever you want, but it isn't full bolt ons. A full bolt on Z would have left that thing harder than you did. IE. Hio.
01-23-2012, 03:59 PM
#26
Launching!
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
FAST setup (larger MAF/SD)
EWP
Gears
25% UD pulley
Whether it would be retarded to do any of them or only 5-10Rwhp for X,XXX$..... It is still bolt ons you don't have that would make your car faster.
Consider it whatever you want, but it isn't full bolt ons. A full bolt on Z would have left that thing harder than you did. IE. Hio.
EWP
Gears
25% UD pulley
Whether it would be retarded to do any of them or only 5-10Rwhp for X,XXX$..... It is still bolt ons you don't have that would make your car faster.
Consider it whatever you want, but it isn't full bolt ons. A full bolt on Z would have left that thing harder than you did. IE. Hio.
01-23-2012, 04:00 PM
#27
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montgomery, TX
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FAST setup (larger MAF/SD)
EWP
Gears
25% UD pulley
Whether it would be retarded to do any of them or only 5-10Rwhp for X,XXX$..... It is still bolt ons you don't have that would make your car faster.
Consider it whatever you want, but it isn't full bolt ons. A full bolt on Z would have left that thing harder than you did. IE. Hio.
EWP
Gears
25% UD pulley
Whether it would be retarded to do any of them or only 5-10Rwhp for X,XXX$..... It is still bolt ons you don't have that would make your car faster.
Consider it whatever you want, but it isn't full bolt ons. A full bolt on Z would have left that thing harder than you did. IE. Hio.
01-23-2012, 04:51 PM
#33
The only things I could bolt on would be a pulley and a fast set up, which would be pointless on my car as is. And putting a pulley on would also be retarted without doing a cam swap. You also have 3.90's, I have the stock 3.42's. I still consider my car 'full bolt ons'
FAST setup (larger MAF/SD)
EWP
Gears
25% UD pulley
Whether it would be retarded to do any of them or only 5-10Rwhp for X,XXX$..... It is still bolt ons you don't have that would make your car faster.
Consider it whatever you want, but it isn't full bolt ons. A full bolt on Z would have left that thing harder than you did. IE. Hio.
EWP
Gears
25% UD pulley
Whether it would be retarded to do any of them or only 5-10Rwhp for X,XXX$..... It is still bolt ons you don't have that would make your car faster.
Consider it whatever you want, but it isn't full bolt ons. A full bolt on Z would have left that thing harder than you did. IE. Hio.
Nive vids OP
01-23-2012, 05:01 PM
#34
Staging Lane
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BADAZZ99TA...for what ever it's worth, i think you did a great job...you're car is gorgeous...ford did do a nice job with the new 5.0's...chevy just has to saddle up and get there head out of there ***....i love the new camaro's, just wish jenny craig would visit chevy is all....great job again op...
01-23-2012, 05:19 PM
#35
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
The only things I could bolt on would be a pulley and a fast set up, which would be pointless on my car as is. And putting a pulley on would also be retarted without doing a cam swap. You also have 3.90's, I have the stock 3.42's. I still consider my car 'full bolt ons'
A set of 1.8 rr would get you 6hp. There's a thread where a guy made the swap and redyno'd.
I think with proper tune, 1.8rr, fast 102 a ls6 could get to 430rwhp....maybe a little over.
Not really, 5.0 mph is down a bit and the only ones running record times are completely gutted race cars. c5 zo6's has been high 11's bone stock.
01-23-2012, 05:30 PM
#38
01-23-2012, 05:40 PM
#40
Launching!
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
as Lemons said. ewp, fast set-up, udp turn the rev limit to 7000 and shift @ 6800. That would make a huge difference. Probally near 20hp. I think your tune needs some work also. My ls6 went over 400rwhp the first time on the dyno with poopy mac headers and the stock SLP catback. The gear is'nt a big deal, especially from a roll. I just switched from 4.10 to 3.90 and picked up time. I actually would'nt mind trying some 3.73.
A set of 1.8 rr would get you 6hp. There's a thread where a guy made the swap and redyno'd.
I think with proper tune, 1.8rr, fast 102 a ls6 could get to 430rwhp....maybe a little over.
Not really, 5.0 mph is down a bit and the only ones running record times are completely gutted race cars. c5 zo6's has been high 11's bone stock.
A set of 1.8 rr would get you 6hp. There's a thread where a guy made the swap and redyno'd.
I think with proper tune, 1.8rr, fast 102 a ls6 could get to 430rwhp....maybe a little over.
Not really, 5.0 mph is down a bit and the only ones running record times are completely gutted race cars. c5 zo6's has been high 11's bone stock.