1ltcap

only 2 of those runs, did the camaro get a REALLY good jump on him. on neither one of those, did that car come back hard enough that it looked like he was spaying....unless he was running a really small shot. the other ones, weren't that much of a jump, and it looked like perhaps he was in too low of a gear when starting. either way, they looked fun.

bh353

No way that 5.0 comes back that fast and puts atleast 2 seconds on that SS with the mods he has..in that short of a distance.

ohioborn80

iTrader: (2)

Crickets crickets..you scarred now? Don't tell me you scarred get that post camaro and truck raped.

916 BREDWNR

Agreed. That was the point I was trying to make. People BS about mods all the time.

bh353

We know the car is equiped with spray..What i want to know is how big of a shot? Because if your running a tune for spray it will not run as strong without it..

itsslow98

iTrader: (18)

Stock shortblock, he did some adjustments over the winter anmd dynoed it a couple weeks ago and made 522, he hasnt run this year that I know of but our track opens tomorrow they just re-paved the first 700 feet.
He hasnt run it since it made 522. Here is the video from february at JPC.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXUD99iyMI8

lablackbeast

iTrader: (5)

I will call you out eventually. Just give it some time and get raped by a car that cant even trap over 125.??? Na i aint scared of that junk

ohioborn80

iTrader: (2)

You must be talking about a different 5.0. I have already trapped constant 129 before my last changes.

sweetC5

If god built a car, ohios car would still trap faster with less You didnt know that! LOL

ohioborn80

iTrader: (2)

Ahh you still butt hurt I see also. Don't be its OK you picked the wrong car. Now my car ran what it ran over and over. But I'm glad I have haters. Means I am doing something right.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

In vids you posted you were not very consistent.

ohioborn80

iTrader: (2)

The trap speed swas always consistent. 128-129. the ET's s well being they all was 10.9-11.1. All depended on 60 ft. Best 60ft then was 1.84. Worse was 1.99. That was pre stall and drive shaft. Constant 128/129 traps. Last time out even threw in some 130-132 traps. But car wasn't tuned for stall. And acted kinda funny on a few passes and seen 125 trap. All ET's was still 10.9-11.1. But 60 ft didn't improve either as the track prepped sucked and I had to leave off idle on most passes.

I am hoping when we convert the computer code over to a 2011 code it fixes my 3rd gear issue. The 2012's seem to have some bugs in them still. Tranny don't want to respond to all commands given. If it doesn't fix then it means its a convertor issue or a tranny issue. Either way the whole thing will be sent to Circle d to have the stall checked and restalled to 4200 and the tranny built to hold more power with newer clutches from Exedy.

sweetC5

Butt hurt Naaa I just think its funny your on your second car because you couldnt handle the M6! Had to puss out and get the auto, how much money did you wast with that clown show! LMAO

kennyxg

iTrader: (1)

The 2011 and 12 Mustangs are capable of trapping 116, 117 with A GOOD TUNE CAI AUTO OR MANUEL + face it the new Camaro's are too heavy. Why are people still arguing about this?

2SSARME

I wish I was in amerikaaa to rape some five ohsss

Heater

You might want to get past the Fox Body's first.

2SSARME

That foxbody is an easy 9second car with traction.

I think I'm fine with the slowstangs on here.