Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

LT1 killed by a 2V??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2012, 06:28 AM
  #41  
10 Second Club
 
madskater5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marc97taws6
yeah they are capable, but sadly most of the times they fall in the wrong hands and don't get modified to their full potential setups.
boom.
Old 04-18-2012, 08:36 AM
  #42  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,935
Received 425 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
I'm not talking about what my car would do with a "good lt car". What does that even mean? Is the OP's car not a "good lt car"? Also the Mach 1 isn't any better than another 4v. They have more compression but **** poor camshafts over the earlier ones. So you have a friend with a cammed LT1 that has been inside the shortblock run 12.2....wow.

And the last LS1 I raced on the street lost by a good 5 lengths...there goes your argument.
And the one before said you really weren't much of a race. Lots of different combo's out there stoppy. Some perform good, some not so good.

I thought 12.2@114 was good for a lt(1st time out too)(first time down the track in this car) with a rebuild because the guy before him melted 2 pistons. He used pistons from another stock engine and stuck this thing together with a mild cam.....pretty much a junk yard build. He has $2200 in the whole mess...rebuild, car, everything. Did that on the used nitto's I sold him. You can't give credit where credit is due to your one sided bullshit nut swinging. If he fools with the car and dynotune's it with a set of long tubes it will probably go into the 11's.

I'll put it another way for ya. It has enough to wax your Mach on a 2800rpm launch.....easily
Old 04-18-2012, 08:38 AM
  #43  
Staging Lane
 
snake95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
And the one before said you really weren't much of a race. Lots of different combo's out there stoppy. Some perform good, some not so good.

I thought 12.2@114 was good for a lt(1st time out too)(first time down the track in this car) with a rebuild because the guy before him melted 2 pistons. He used pistons from another stock engine and stuck this thing together with a mild cam.....pretty much a junk yard build. He has $2200 in the whole mess...rebuild, car, everything. Did that on the used nitto's I sold him. You can't give credit where credit is due to your one sided bullshit nut swinging. If he fools with the car and dynotune's it with a set of long tubes it will probably go into the 11's.

I'll put it another way for ya. It has enough to wax your Mach on a 2800rpm launch.....easily
Of all people in this section, it brings me great humor to see you say this, although it's a **** poor sentence, I think I know what you were trying to say (see bolded part).
Old 04-18-2012, 08:50 AM
  #44  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,935
Received 425 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by snake95
Of all people in this section, it brings me great humor to see you say this, although it's a **** poor sentence, I think I know what you were trying to say (see bolded part).
The difference is that I am on a LS based site. It's not like I go to Ford based forums mucking them up and disrespecting that site like you guys do here constantly. Always trying to say how awesome your **** is. Shove the sentence **** up your ***. There are English forums , go live on them.

The only thing I said to ruffle ya'lls feathers is he should've won. Then the bullshit ensues. And yes with the evidence in hand, he should have won.
Old 04-18-2012, 09:00 AM
  #45  
Banned
 
WhiteKnight '01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
That's terrible


That car can't be any less than 290rwhp. My car put down 260rwhp without long tubes or a tune. Stock heads and cams.
Your 2V 4.6 put down 260RWHP? With what mods?
Old 04-18-2012, 09:10 AM
  #46  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by WhiteKnight '01
Your 2V 4.6 put down 260RWHP? With what mods?
+1 i want to hear this explination. maybe FULL bolt on car with a 50 shot?
Old 04-18-2012, 09:17 AM
  #47  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

C&L intake and plenum, BBK equal-length shorty headers, Bassani catted x-pipe, Borla exhaust. 5spd GTs generally put down ~230rwhp stock. I hope that 50 shot comment was a joke...
Old 04-18-2012, 09:18 AM
  #48  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
And the one before said you really weren't much of a race. Lots of different combo's out there stoppy. Some perform good, some not so good.

I thought 12.2@114 was good for a lt(1st time out too)(first time down the track in this car) with a rebuild because the guy before him melted 2 pistons. He used pistons from another stock engine and stuck this thing together with a mild cam.....pretty much a junk yard build. He has $2200 in the whole mess...rebuild, car, everything. Did that on the used nitto's I sold him. You can't give credit where credit is due to your one sided bullshit nut swinging. If he fools with the car and dynotune's it with a set of long tubes it will probably go into the 11's.

I'll put it another way for ya. It has enough to wax your Mach on a 2800rpm launch.....easily
Show me where Sepno said that.


A cammed built LT1 that runs low 12's and MIGHT go high 11's with a tune and longtubes. Impressive, bring that LT1 to the track I'll run him and then afterwards he can wax my car in the pits for me.
Old 04-18-2012, 09:30 AM
  #49  
Banned
 
WhiteKnight '01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
C&L intake and plenum, BBK equal-length shorty headers, Bassani catted x-pipe, Borla exhaust. 5spd GTs generally put down ~230rwhp stock. I hope that 50 shot comment was a joke...
Okay, just in your previous comment you didn't mention any mods.

So this Mustang in the video had heads and cam and was running 288RWHP?
Old 04-18-2012, 09:51 AM
  #50  
10 Second Club
 
madskater5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I still blame the heads for the Mustang's lack of power for mods, ported PI's or not. I know 2 valves aren't insane power makers, but from what little research I did for mine, any stock 2 valve head isn't helping your power situation.

Solid aftermarket(!) heads and a good cam will easily make over 300whp.

Last edited by madskater5; 04-18-2012 at 09:58 AM.
Old 04-18-2012, 09:52 AM
  #51  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ported stock heads and tiny cams I'm guessing.
Old 04-18-2012, 09:59 AM
  #52  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by madskater5
I still blame the heads for the Mustang's lack of power for mods. Ported PI's or not. I know 2 valves aren't insane power makers, but from what little research I did for mine, any stock 2 valve head isn't helping your power situation.

Solid aftermarket(!) heads and a good cam will easily make over 300whp.
Pretty much. Just like in a 5.0 pushrod, heads will make or break the combination.
Old 04-18-2012, 10:03 AM
  #53  
10 Second Club
 
madskater5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Ported stock heads and tiny cams I'm guessing.
He said above its ported PI's. Maybe its a Comp Thumpr cam? Aren't they almost entirely for sound with little in the way of gains compared to a real performance cam?

http://www.compcams.com/Thumpr/index.html
Old 04-18-2012, 10:40 AM
  #54  
Banned
 
UNVME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The LT1 lost because of it's tires. Plain and simple. 2V's are a complete joke. Heads/Cam ford gets reeled in by a bolt-on chevy. Lulz hilfuckinglarious!
Old 04-18-2012, 11:32 AM
  #55  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,935
Received 425 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Show me where Sepno said that.


A cammed built LT1 that runs low 12's and MIGHT go high 11's with a tune and longtubes. Impressive, bring that LT1 to the track I'll run him and then afterwards he can wax my car in the pits for me.
You can go back threw the threads and find it....or ask him. You even said in that thread he pulled you so hard you thought he had a cam.

If you want to compare times he has already outrun you at the track....12.2@114> your 12.6@108....quit talking out your ***.
Old 04-18-2012, 11:38 AM
  #56  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
blakez28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Fort Mill, SC
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WhiteKnight '01
Okay, just in your previous comment you didn't mention any mods.

So this Mustang in the video had heads and cam and was running 288RWHP?
Yep. heads/cams, longtubes, exhaust, and made 288/305. His cams love nitrous though and made decent power, but what do you expect from a 2v?

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Ported stock heads and tiny cams I'm guessing.
.They are 262 duration on the intake, 270 on the exhaust, and .500 lift on both the intake and the exhaust

Originally Posted by UNVME
The LT1 lost because of it's tires. Plain and simple. 2V's are a complete joke. Heads/Cam ford gets reeled in by a bolt-on chevy. Lulz hilfuckinglarious!
mod per mod an LT1 is going to come out on top. Imagine if I had heads/cam vs a bolt on mustang.
BUT the mustang driver out drove me, and had plenty of power to win.
Old 04-18-2012, 11:48 AM
  #57  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,935
Received 425 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blakez28
Yep. heads/cams, longtubes, exhaust, and made 288/305. His cams love nitrous though and made decent power, but what do you expect from a 2v?



.They are 262 duration on the intake, 270 on the exhaust, and .500 lift on both the intake and the exhaust



mod per mod an LT1 is going to come out on top. Imagine if I had heads/cam vs a bolt on mustang.
BUT the mustang driver out drove me, and had plenty of power to win.
Sounds like op has a level head.
Old 04-18-2012, 11:58 AM
  #58  
On The Tree
 
Heater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
You can't give credit where credit is due to your one sided bullshit nut swinging.




I have officially seen it all now
Old 04-18-2012, 12:33 PM
  #59  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
You can go back threw the threads and find it....or ask him. You even said in that thread he pulled you so hard you thought he had a cam.

If you want to compare times he has already outrun you at the track....12.2@114> your 12.6@108....quit talking out your ***.
114 is a strong trap speed for a cam-only LT1. Low 12's at 111mph is generally a good run for an auto LT1. I suppose an M6 would add a few mph
Old 04-18-2012, 01:45 PM
  #60  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
johnjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Gardendale,Al.
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madskater5
I agree with this. He prob either had ported stockers or the PI heads off the mid 01-04's and is calling it a real head upgrade. I'm not surprised about where this race was heading, but if the mustang had better heads it should have pulled harder. 2v's biggest problem is the heads. Cams are almost worthless on anything close to stock heads.
The 2V PI heads were 99-04. I had a 03 GT with under drive,prof.products tb,elbow&spacer,Xpipe,Mack cat back,spec stage 2 and 3.73's. The car ran 13.2's all day on 315/35/17 street tire and 12.70's on et streets. First through third felt good in the car but felt like it lost its get up go in 4th.
Not defending the mustangs but if that's a head and cam Stang and running 13's something is wrong.
I own a 02 M6 NBM formula now,can't beat it for power and gas. But I did enjoy the sound of the Stang rolling through the gears.


Quick Reply: LT1 killed by a 2V??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 PM.