Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Chased down an srt8 today...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2012, 12:00 AM
  #101  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slapattack
I dont get the arguments about weight and engine size. Dodge decided to go with more horsepower and not shed weight down....its all the same as going light weight with a smaller displacement engine.

There are lots of other things to look at aside from horsepower ratings, like actual torque and horsepower curves. I know the new RT's are really underated because they run low 13's but are only advertised at 390hp.

And stopsign...you post so much bullshit i think your actually starting to believe it.
Some dyno's are showing the 392 underrated as well. Closer to 500-515hp instead of 470
Old 04-21-2012, 03:12 AM
  #102  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, GA
Posts: 3,869
Received 55 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
I can see what he means somewhat. If your car is a 103 car and you started 2 cars back I dont see anyway how you could make up the yards and pull him back in even if he didn't know how to drive.
+1. Srt8 is a 110+mph car bone stock on a bad day... an AUTOtragic lt1 pulling him from a roll? He either wasn't racing, was in 5th gear, was humoring you, or your car breaks the laws of physics.


Also, I haven't completely rules out unicorns, leprechauns, or some other sort of magic happening. Anything can happen on the street
Old 04-21-2012, 03:50 AM
  #103  
Staging Lane
 
GotHemi?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DietCoke
+1. Srt8 is a 110+mph car bone stock on a bad day... an AUTOtragic lt1 pulling him from a roll? He either wasn't racing, was in 5th gear, was humoring you, or your car breaks the laws of physics.


Also, I haven't completely rules out unicorns, leprechauns, or some other sort of magic happening. Anything can happen on the street
6.1's are NOT 110mph cars all day long. Have they done it stock?? Yes but its not east feat. The 392's deserve to be called 110+mph cars all day long even tho ive seen a few trap less.
Old 04-21-2012, 08:14 AM
  #104  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Amazin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Edgewater FL. but, Jersey for life!
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i was just bumping around on the challengertalk board and they were talking quarter mile times with an srt8 and a 6 speed. there were some nice numbers but on average, with a stock car i kept seeing 13.6 @104.
Old 04-21-2012, 08:51 AM
  #105  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Amazin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Edgewater FL. but, Jersey for life!
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

and dietcoke...autotragic? really? cause a stalled auto is as fast if not faster than a stick car...with less driver error possible.
Old 04-21-2012, 09:08 AM
  #106  
On The Tree
 
Demon 383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oddwraith
L O L! Jury, what ******' jury? You're being judged by your peers here, not handpicked ones . Stock Mach is dead bait for a 392, obviously. Radials, geared and breathing? Might be a different case
He'll still lose. 115 traps vs. 108. If the SRT can launch on those street tires that Mach won't stand a chance.
Old 04-21-2012, 09:12 AM
  #107  
On The Tree
 
Demon 383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by niteriderws6
nice ricer excuse....boo hoo who cares if its $10,000 or $100,000 pull your skirt down you vagina. Its 4200 f*ckin pounds, with leather seats, touch screen, rear seats and the size of a tank and it still smokes your lightweight bolt on geared mustardstain....

Bolt on mach 1's are a joke just like their owners. I was suppose to race a full bolt on geared and tuned mach 1 this past weekend but he sold it for an ls1....i wonder why
ouch!
Old 04-21-2012, 06:44 PM
  #108  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Amazin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Edgewater FL. but, Jersey for life!
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Demon 383
He'll still lose. 115 traps vs. 108. If the SRT can launch on those street tires that Mach won't stand a chance.
that's the trick...hooking that thing up. but once it gets rolling those 470 horse will do some damage...
Old 04-21-2012, 07:40 PM
  #109  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
oddwraith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yup, those 515 horsies will work their magic...
Old 04-21-2012, 07:42 PM
  #110  
Banned
 
WhiteKnight '01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oddwraith
Yup, those 515 horsies will work their magic...
So the 393 is underrated too?

Is there any V8 out there that is NOT underrated? Except the 2v 4.6.
Old 04-21-2012, 07:45 PM
  #111  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Amazin1
and dietcoke...autotragic? really? cause a stalled auto is as fast if not faster than a stick car...with less driver error possible.
people that put down automatics just have never really raced with a good one. i used to think they sucked. till i drove the shops camaro with a turbo400 and trans brake. that ****** launched just as hard as a clutch car, and i was a LOT more consistent on my reaction times.
Old 04-21-2012, 07:54 PM
  #112  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Amazin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Edgewater FL. but, Jersey for life!
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1ltcap
people that put down automatics just have never really raced with a good one. i used to think they sucked. till i drove the shops camaro with a turbo400 and trans brake. that ****** launched just as hard as a clutch car, and i was a LOT more consistent on my reaction times.
exactly..you also don't have the slop you sometimes get with so so drivers shifting and the possibility of a missed gear. rowing the gears is awesome but, an auto is consistent.
Old 04-21-2012, 07:57 PM
  #113  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
oddwraith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WhiteKnight '01
So the 393 is underrated too?

Is there any V8 out there that is NOT underrated? Except the 2v 4.6.
Lol. Not totally 100% on the 393 cars, but the 392s are certainly underrated. Either that or they have transmissions that were graced by the same hand of God that graced the ls1. Take your pick . They would rather under shoot than end up with what happened to Ford so few years ago I guess. Never aim high unless you can plant it, probably a good motto to go by.
Originally Posted by 1ltcap
people that put down automatics just have never really raced with a good one. i used to think they sucked. till i drove the shops camaro with a turbo400 and trans brake. that ****** launched just as hard as a clutch car, and i was a LOT more consistent on my reaction times.
x2 Trans Brake ftw
Old 04-21-2012, 08:05 PM
  #114  
Staging Lane
 
GotHemi?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WhiteKnight '01
So the 393 is underrated too?

Is there any V8 out there that is NOT underrated? Except the 2v 4.6.
No. It makes 470 as advertised.

Im going by 15% drivetrain loss.

If one were to use 20% then yes to them its underrated.
Old 04-21-2012, 08:12 PM
  #115  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
oddwraith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nuh uh.....
Old 04-21-2012, 08:13 PM
  #116  
Staging Lane
 
GotHemi?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by oddwraith
Nuh uh.....
lol Yes uh!
Old 04-21-2012, 08:14 PM
  #117  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
oddwraith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

lol. Not you again....
Old 04-21-2012, 08:22 PM
  #118  
Staging Lane
 
GotHemi?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by oddwraith
lol. Not you again....
Nope. This isnt me.
Old 04-21-2012, 08:26 PM
  #119  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
ZNix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plympton, MA
Posts: 193
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
yea...considering you run what mid 12's@110 modded and SRT8tech runs 12.2@113 bone stock along with another member here who runs 12.4@113. Looks like your still behind.
But... You run mid 12's modded... Looks like you are WAY behind..
Old 04-21-2012, 08:28 PM
  #120  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
oddwraith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GotHemi?
Nope. This isnt me.
Ya I had my doubts...But you're full of **** you know though right? They are not 470 at the crank, and those drivetrains are not good for only 15% loss....who do you think you're talking to here?
<Had to ninja edit since Znuts cut in on our convo>



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 PM.