When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
114-116 from stock 392s? Where are you seeing that?
As for Magazines...
They use GPS timing to get their results
They correct their results to 'ideal conditions'
Simply can't compare their results to actual track results.
One of the silliest, most haterish comments I've read in a long time. The mag's times are pretty much spot on with what these cars are putting up at the track. Actually, guys are going a couple tenths quicker at prepped drag strips, so in reality, most mag times are a tad slower. Just like when the LS1 debuted and most mags were getting low to mid 13's, or LT1's for that matter going low-mid 14's. I'd say the mag s numbers are pretty damn close 95% of the time. Surprised you would make a noobish comment like that.