Challenger SRT8 6.4L vs. wife's Pontiac G8
#61
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Agreed. But the autos are obviously the ones running the better times, and it seems like the m6 cars are having a little more trouble with the cars that should be slower (on paper). Due to all the people buying them not able to drive? Who knows.
Better yet baby seats and groceries![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
I'm talking about a slightly modded G8 GXP. Not a GT. If you can show me multiple examples of proof otherwise I'd be very interested in seeing it.
Hell a fully loaded 2ss wouldn't be too far off a base 392.
Better yet baby seats and groceries
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
I'm talking about a slightly modded G8 GXP. Not a GT. If you can show me multiple examples of proof otherwise I'd be very interested in seeing it.
Hell a fully loaded 2ss wouldn't be too far off a base 392.
#62
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yea right LOL a 10 SS is a drivers race with a stock 6.1 Challenger. Been proven many times. Anytime I race my friends 10'ss we are a dead even race all the way up to 130 where i start to edge him. Me intake, catback, tune. Him LS3, intake, catback, tune. A 392 will run away from a 10 SS both drivers being equal. More Hp, faster times, higher trap
![Burnout](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_burnout.gif)
Last edited by willys srt8; 05-29-2012 at 04:54 PM.
#63
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yea right LOL a 10 SS is a drivers race with a stock 6.1 Challenger. Been proven many times. Anytime I race my friends 10'ss we are a dead even race all the way up to 130 where i start to edge him. Me intake, catback, tune. Him LS3, intake, catback, tune. A 392 will run away from a 10 SS both drivers being equal. More Hp, faster times, higher trap
![Mr. Cool](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cool.gif)
Last edited by why87; 05-29-2012 at 04:42 PM.
#66
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
Face it...you haven't ran one before because you are afraid of getting your **** pushed in by a stock 392 because in reality your car with mods runs mid 8's to low 8's in the 1/8th depending on which ****** wheels you happen to be running that day.
#69
#70
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am very impressed with the 392 5A cars. They're running mid-low 12's out here in good weather, right where they're supposed to be going by their power-to-weight. For comparisons sake, majority of the 6.1 cars were running bottom 13s here when new. And the 6.4's just downright haul *** from a roll.
I've noticed the only people "not impressed" with the new 392 are butt-hurt Ford guys and the older 6.1L owners. Go figure.
I've noticed the only people "not impressed" with the new 392 are butt-hurt Ford guys and the older 6.1L owners. Go figure.
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
#71
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
HEMI®, GEN III
CRATE ENGINES
A. 392 Hemi Crate Engine, 540 Horsepower
Mopar's fire-breathing, 525-horsepower (490 ft.-lbs. Torqque) fuelinjected
392 Hemi crate engine is an all-new engine assembly for a new
generation of Mopar enthusiasts. Comes complete with a
preprogrammed engine controller and harness to ensure compatibility
with virtually any vehicle configuration. The original 392 Hemi (Gen I)
was introduced on 1957 Chrysler and Imperial models, replacing the
354-cid version of the Hemi from 1956. Drop in a 392 Hemi and drop in
a legend!
1 P5153603 Block, Long, Complete Engine from Valve Covers to
the Oil Pan, Requires Intake Manifold and Engine
Control System, 392 Hemi
1 P5153604 Crate Engine, 392 Hemi, Carbureted, 540
Horsepower, 490 ft.-lbs. Torque
1 P5153605 Crate Engine, 392 Hemi, EFI, 525 Horsepower, 510
ft.-lbs. Torque
Specifications:
· Deep-Skirted Cast Iron Block with Cross-Bolted Mains
· CNC Ported Aluminum Twin-Plug Cylinder Heads
· Stainless Steel 2.100" Intake and 1.600" Exhaust Valves
· Ovate Wire (Beehive) Competition Valve Springs
· Viton Competition Valve Stem Seals
· 279°/285° (duration @ .006") Hydraulic Roller Camshaft
· 0.584" Intake and 0.552" Exhaust Lift
· Forged Pistons (4.055" Bore)
· 10.5:1 Compression Ratio
· Aluminum Single Plane High Rise Intake Manifold
· Holley 870 cfm Four-barrel Carburetor (1)
· 4140 Forged Steel Crankshaft - 3.795" Stroke
· 4130 Forged Steel I-Beam Connecting Rods - 6.200" Length
· SFI-Approved Competition Crankshaft Damper
· "Plug and Play" Wiring Harness
· 80 mm manual throttle body (2)
· Premium Tri-Metal Performance Engine Bearings
· Precision Balanced Rotating Assembly
· Distributorless Coil-On-Plug (COP) Ignition System
"Plug & Play" Engine Management System (EMS) Features Include:
· Windows® software
· Built-In Peak and Hold Injector Drivers
· Built-In Direct Drive Ignition
· Built-In Dual Wideband UEGO Controllers
· UEGO sensors not required or included
· Sequential Fuel Injection
· Soft Cut Rev Limiters
· Onboard 512 kb Datalogger
· Definable Knock Control
· Full Idle Control
· Uses all the Factory Sensors
· Complete 392 calibration included
Note: (1) Carbureted Engine Only; (2) EFI Engine Only
Note: 10.5:1 compression ratio allows the use of current high-octane
premium pump gasoline (92+ octane). Crate engines that change the
emissions performance of the vehicle may not be legal for use on
vehicles regulated for highway use in California and other states.
Horsepower and torque rating based on test engine. Ratings may vary
on individual engines.
Last edited by willys srt8; 05-29-2012 at 05:26 PM.
#72
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That maybe true. However if you read earlier in this thread where I compared the 6.1l based 392 to the current 5.7l based 392 in the production cars you would know that the Gen III 6.4l (6.1 based) produces more power than the current 5.7l based engine with the MDS. My engine was swapped a while ago and I am currently making more power than the current 392s.
#77
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
#79
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Aren't the fastest ones automatics like your car?
I'm pretty sure they were designed so a 67 year old man can drive it just as good as anyone else. Not to mention how do you drive up on someone and tell if they are a rookie or not?
******* moron
Face it...you haven't ran one before because you are afraid of getting your **** pushed in by a stock 392 because in reality your car with mods runs mid 8's to low 8's in the 1/8th depending on which ****** wheels you happen to be running that day.
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
Face it...you haven't ran one before because you are afraid of getting your **** pushed in by a stock 392 because in reality your car with mods runs mid 8's to low 8's in the 1/8th depending on which ****** wheels you happen to be running that day.
edit how come your bitch *** hasnt posted in our thread dedicated to you yet?
https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...s-mach1-7.html
![](http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/1322/mach1excuses.jpg)
Last edited by NiteRiderWS6; 05-29-2012 at 05:56 PM.
#80
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am very impressed with the 392 5A cars. They're running mid-low 12's out here in good weather, right where they're supposed to be going by their power-to-weight. For comparisons sake, majority of the 6.1 cars were running bottom 13s here when new. And the 6.4's just downright haul *** from a roll.
I've noticed the only people "not impressed" with the new 392 are butt-hurt Ford guys and the older 6.1L owners. Go figure.![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
I've noticed the only people "not impressed" with the new 392 are butt-hurt Ford guys and the older 6.1L owners. Go figure.
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)