Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Challenger SRT8 6.4L vs. wife's Pontiac G8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2012, 08:32 PM
  #261  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
O-FiveCC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You don't have to go by hero runs lol. I just stated it was a better way to go by then just saying "I saw so and so run 12.8" And another says "I saw so an so run 12.7". Internet racing is usually very vague, with no one ALL conditions such as DA, wind direction, weight, track prep...As I said before, hero runs will at least show you what happens with every condition perfect. Thats just me, and thats how I judge a car, not by what people have in their sig, or by what drag times says, or by what I see at the track....all those times are more driver/prep/DA related.


Machs are high 13s lol wow my friends 98 cobra was running high 13s lol
LOL, what's you point??? These car's are very close, with a tiny edge going to the Mach?
Old 05-31-2012, 08:34 PM
  #262  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
O-FiveCC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
I own both cars a 99 cobra and had many ls1 cars. They feel the same except the ls1 is easier to get out from under you and at 4th the ls1 seems to keep pulling better than the cobra. From what I hear Mach 1 run better
Sounds great, I have also raced many of these cars several times. However, you can feel how you want, I was stating why I like to judge by hero runs. You don't have to like or accept it lol
Old 05-31-2012, 08:41 PM
  #263  
12 Second Club
 
willys srt8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Obviously the list I previously posted was not all inclusive of the C5s. It was for a guestimate. I can't find crap on the hero runs for a SRT. Maybe someone here has a link or data.
Old 05-31-2012, 08:45 PM
  #264  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by O-FiveCC
You don't have to go by hero runs lol. I just stated it was a better way to go by then just saying "I saw so and so run 12.8" And another says "I saw so an so run 12.7". Internet racing is usually very vague, with no one ALL conditions such as DA, wind direction, weight, track prep...As I said before, hero runs will at least show you what happens with every condition perfect. Thats just me, and thats how I judge a car, not by what people have in their sig, or by what drag times says, or by what I see at the track....all those times are more driver/prep/DA related.




LOL, what's you point??? These car's are very close, with a tiny edge going to the Mach?
99/01cobra is a 13.5-13.7 car 98 cobra 13.8-13.9 mach 1 13.3-13.50 I could be wrong just what I think.
Old 05-31-2012, 08:48 PM
  #265  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ****** srt8
Obviously the list I previously posted was not all inclusive of the C5s. It was for a guestimate. I can't find crap on the hero runs for a SRT. Maybe someone here has a link or data.
I saw one just a little while ago of a 12.5 pass at 110 for the 300 hard to believe but did see It. i know with little mode its possible not sure bone stock
Old 05-31-2012, 08:48 PM
  #266  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
O-FiveCC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ****** srt8
Obviously the list I previously posted was not all inclusive of the C5s. It was for a guestimate. I can't find crap on the hero runs for a SRT. Maybe someone here has a link or data.
Gotcha. Doesn't seem to far off for the C5. I said 12.6 you found 12.7. Let me know what you find on the SRT's. As you know, I love to know the best couple hero runs from each car.
Old 05-31-2012, 08:52 PM
  #267  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

http://www.lxforums.com/board/f61/wh...57/index2.html
Old 05-31-2012, 09:01 PM
  #268  
12 Second Club
 
willys srt8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
Good find!

I know I ran a 12.85@108.39 in +1872 DA when I was bone stock and It was my first day ever driving on a strip. This was after the four hour drive from Newport News, VA to VMP. All due to an arguement on this site that said a STOCK SRT8 couldn't break 12s. Sad part is I still haven't been able to beat it. Now I just blow the street tires off. I don't go to the track enough to justify the DRs.
Old 05-31-2012, 09:04 PM
  #269  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

That's pretty good for being stock. Hopefully I don't blow the tires off in my little skittle :/
Old 05-31-2012, 09:08 PM
  #270  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
O-FiveCC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Damn. I ran a 13.5 at 103 stock lol. I did have bad front strut rubbing wearing, horrible rear tie camber, I believe a tune left on the car from unknown mods, and wierd mismatched 245/45/17 street tires when I ran. I ran an SRt9 Charger later, while I spun and had a 2.6 60', he ran a 13.7 with a decent launch. Also ran a Auto 2011 5.0 Mustang with slicks (on my low 13.5 run) who out 60' me by .15 and beat me .15 (high 13.3 run). I know that 5.0 is faster, which leads me to like hero runs lol.

12.8 stock is good, I don't care who you are. I have read a few GTO's going 12.9 bone stock first time out, but I never expect to see it.



BrentEB02 is the guy that ran 12.50's in a real stock 300C SRT8, and trapped like 110 I think.
Old 05-31-2012, 09:13 PM
  #271  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by O-FiveCC
LOL, what's you point??? These car's are very close, with a tiny edge going to the Mach?
Your posts just make more and more sense as you go on. Keep going...do tell more
Old 05-31-2012, 09:16 PM
  #272  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
99/01cobra is a 13.5-13.7 car 98 cobra 13.8-13.9 mach 1 13.3-13.50 I could be wrong just what I think.
IMO the Mach 1 is a 13.9 car with a horrible driver, 13.5 with a below average driver, 13.3 with an average driver, 13.1 with a good driver, and I think given seat time with a great driver one could run 12.9 if track prep was done well. The problem with Mustangs stock is the lack of rubber they are given and the gears (but we all know this so I'm just pointing out the obvious).
Old 05-31-2012, 09:17 PM
  #273  
12 Second Club
 
willys srt8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

O-FiveCC I agree. Too many variables to try to factor. I like the mag times due to the fact that it tends to be the same group that tests all the cars. They try to factor in as many factors as they can to accurately compare makes. They usually don't pull of the hero runs nor do they run the slowest times. So by comparison, we the consumer ends up with a somewhere in the middle set of numbers for each make. Which is what the average knuckle head can do at the track. LOL
Old 05-31-2012, 09:18 PM
  #274  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
Cwarta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Elm Creek, NE
Posts: 1,796
Received 58 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

Stock ls1 gto vs mach 1 from dig = Drivers race. Stock ls1gto vs stock mach1 from roll= mach1 getting raped. Same trans in each of course.
Old 05-31-2012, 09:19 PM
  #275  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
O-FiveCC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is a problem with a lot of stock "performance" cars, which is why "driver" is a good mod, or first mod's being gears or a real tire. Not sure what the mach comes with stock, I know my car comes with 245/45/17, which is completely rediculous.


The problem with Mustangs stock is the lack of rubber they are given stock and the gears (but we all know this so I'm just pointing out the obvious).
Old 05-31-2012, 09:24 PM
  #276  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
O-FiveCC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ****** srt8
O-FiveCC I agree. Too many variables to try to factor. I like the mag times due to the fact that it tends to be the same group that tests all the cars. They try to factor in as many factors as they can to accurately compare makes. They usually don't pull of the hero runs nor do they run the slowest times. So by comparison, we the consumer ends up with a somewhere in the middle set of numbers for each make. Which is what the average knuckle head can do at the track. LOL
I agree to an extent. An issue in the back of my head, is whether a certain company has paid the magazine any money. Not sure if this has happened, or whether it is common, just an issue. I take the magazine times and figure "average" runs for a car myself.

Saying a stock Mach1 should run low 13's makes me LOL.



Stopsign, I called out bolt-on Mach on SVTP. If they are as fast as you say, just get one for two to go to my track day, and we can settle this. I'm not into the internet dick measuring like many. If I have a question of who is faster, I'll just race them. I'll have some weight out in prep for some 11 second car's, so tell them to do the same. If not, then we can calculate .1 for every 100lbs. You like to be a smart ***, I like to actually run said car. Get me some contestants! I see Mach's all over down here, but so far, only have one sketchy response from a bolt-on Mach running 12.8...

And stopsign, you say 12.9 if track prep is great, I don't know the stock Hero Mach runs, but these cars have been out 7-8 years, Has anyone run 12.9 stock with proof?

Last edited by O-FiveCC; 05-31-2012 at 09:30 PM.
Old 05-31-2012, 09:28 PM
  #277  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
O-FiveCC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cwarta
Stock ls1 gto vs mach 1 from dig = Drivers race. Stock ls1gto vs stock mach1 from roll= mach1 getting raped. Same trans in each of course.
I actually think it would be a close lol, sorry to step on a fellow GTO brother's toes. They have about 40 less HP and are 400lbs lighter. Seems very close
Old 05-31-2012, 09:37 PM
  #278  
12 Second Club
 
willys srt8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by O-FiveCC
I agree to an extent. An issue in the back of my head, is whether a certain company has paid the magazine any money. Not sure if this has happened, or whether it is common, just an issue. I take the magazine times and figure "average" runs for a car myself.
I can't speak on the integrity of the Mags. However, I try to give them the benefit of the doubt that they are professionals. When multiple mags including the mags that cater to that particular brand are saying the same thing that other non-loyal mags are, I have to consider this to be the bias breaker.

For example, I'm sure that the mustang community didn't want to hear about the Camaro running better times in a Mustang mag.

http://www.stangbangers.com/01_Bullitt_Article2.htm
Old 05-31-2012, 09:42 PM
  #279  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
O-FiveCC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I 100% agree on that.
Old 05-31-2012, 09:42 PM
  #280  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
Cwarta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Elm Creek, NE
Posts: 1,796
Received 58 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by O-FiveCC
I actually think it would be a close lol, sorry to step on a fellow GTO brother's toes. They have about 40 less HP and are 400lbs lighter. Seems very close
Hey, no problem! I do think a dig race could go either way, straight off the assembly line. But im pretty sure 9 times out of 10 a ls1 gto would win the roll race. Now throw tunes at them both.......


Quick Reply: Challenger SRT8 6.4L vs. wife's Pontiac G8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 AM.