Challenger SRT8 6.4L vs. wife's Pontiac G8
05-29-2012, 06:08 PM
#84
Did you not read what I said you dumb ****** ****. I said I dont bother racing new 392 owners who look like rookies because I want a clean race. Obviously I know they are rookies by how they are driving the car. You dumb bitch this thread isnt about my car that is still faster then your shitty mach 1 on 22's. Want me to go smoke another one on video for you. **** out of here. You trap 108 and you think you can beat me LOL. Let me know when you get a real car bitch and stop driving your girlfriends.
edit how come your bitch *** hasnt posted in our thread dedicated to you yet?
https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...s-mach1-7.html
edit how come your bitch *** hasnt posted in our thread dedicated to you yet?
https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...s-mach1-7.html
Go make you another video, hell post up some more youtube videos instead of posting up your timeslips. If you want me to post up what my cars run instead of my wife's then you let me know, I've said I can play that game too. Timeslips or dyno sheets...your call, but make it another thread. And I honestly never saw that thread. I look over most of that guy's posts anyways.
And as far as the picture...I don't make excuses for how my car runs...I make you make excuses on how your's runs. Bitch
05-29-2012, 06:10 PM
#85
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hope you're not refering to me as being butt-hurt. I'm not sure of any other SRT owners in this thread other than Nite and myself. I haven't had a 6.1 in the car for a while. When I drive the new cars after getting out of mine, I'm not impressed. Better than a 6.1l stock to stock, absolutely. Modded N/A 6.1l to stock 392, depends on the mods.
Last edited by willys srt8; 05-29-2012 at 06:20 PM.
05-29-2012, 06:15 PM
#86
I don't get it...my car runs 13.2
05-29-2012, 06:18 PM
#87
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This isn't about you and me. I've proven time and time again my car is faster than yours. If you can't outrun a car that traps slower than you then you need to learn how to drive. And I'm white...I don't run 22" wheels muh *****. Go make you another video, hell post up some more youtube videos instead of posting up your timeslips. If you want me to post up what my cars run instead of my wife's then you let me know, I've said I can play that game too. Timeslips or dyno sheets...your call, but make it another thread.
And I honestly never saw that thread. I look over most of that guy's posts anyways.
And as far as the picture...I don't make excuses for how my car runs...I make you make excuses on how your's runs. Bitch
Go make you another video, hell post up some more youtube videos instead of posting up your timeslips. If you want me to post up what my cars run instead of my wife's then you let me know, I've said I can play that game too. Timeslips or dyno sheets...your call, but make it another thread. And I honestly never saw that thread. I look over most of that guy's posts anyways.
And as far as the picture...I don't make excuses for how my car runs...I make you make excuses on how your's runs. Bitch
05-29-2012, 06:18 PM
#89
Teching In
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now that's moving. For those who claim they aren't impressed I dunno what else they're expecting. lol'z
05-29-2012, 06:33 PM
#93
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We as a group probably Nite too, were expecting the SRT guys to drop in the the Gen III which at the time was just a stroked 6.1l that was already in production. Dodge had been going to put the 6.4l in for years before they finally did it. When they did, they opted for the fuel efficiency of the MDS system on the 5.7 instead of the power of the 6.1l based Gen III to reduce the Gas Guzzler tax. People who buy performance cars with V8s and whine about fuel ecconomy are just stupid. That's what I was expecting. Class dismissed.
05-29-2012, 06:42 PM
#94
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We as a group probably Nite too, were expecting the SRT guys to drop in the the Gen III which at the time was just a stroked 6.1l that was already in production. Dodge had been going to put the 6.4l in for years before they finally did it. When they did, they opted for the fuel efficiency of the MDS system on the 5.7 instead of the power of the 6.1l based Gen III to reduce the Gas Guzzler tax. People who buy performance cars with V8s and whine about fuel ecconomy are just stupid. That's what I was expecting. Class dismissed.
05-29-2012, 06:44 PM
#95
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-29-2012, 06:49 PM
#96
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That maybe true. However, if you read earlier in this thread where I compared the 6.1l based 392 to the current 5.7l based 392 in the production cars you would know that the Gen III 6.4l (6.1 based) produces more power than the current 5.7l based engine with the MDS.
HEMIŽ, GEN III
CRATE ENGINES
A. 392 Hemi Crate Engine, 540 Horsepower
Mopar's fire-breathing, 525-horsepower (490 ft.-lbs. Torqque) fuelinjected
392 Hemi crate engine is an all-new engine assembly for a new
generation of Mopar enthusiasts.
HEMIŽ, GEN III
CRATE ENGINES
A. 392 Hemi Crate Engine, 540 Horsepower
Mopar's fire-breathing, 525-horsepower (490 ft.-lbs. Torqque) fuelinjected
392 Hemi crate engine is an all-new engine assembly for a new
generation of Mopar enthusiasts.
