2v + more boost = puppy kicked Cobalt SS/TC
#83
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That would be pretty awesome. For a '96-'98 GT I'd rather do a ninja PI ported-head/cams build since people think they are so slow. But the next S2000 I get, I'm gonna run the stock engine till it's beyond saving, and then LSx swap it.
#89
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
#91
Teching In
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Lol good comeback I guess? What is so special about an S2000? I know there is nothing special about a 2v, so don't ask that question. I've beat my friends full exhaust/intake S2gay when all he did was talk **** about how I should get a "real" car and how his car would walk me. Can they look good? Yes. Would I drive one? No.
#97
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've owned both cars. From a dead stop with a competent driver in both, the Mustang had a very slight edge in the 1/4 mile. From a roll, it was a dead heat. The Mustang had bolt-ons, the S2000 was bone stock.
#98
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)