Cruise and some races: C5 Z06 vs GT500 vs 5.0 vs 03 Cobra vs G8
10-08-2012, 02:54 PM
#41
I just got in touch with the owner and like I suspected he hasn't been on a dyno yet. I believe the 430 is Zyborg's estimate based on how it hangs with him compared to other 5.0s with known dyno #s. Personally I think he's closer to 400 because he's had trouble with a 400hp Evo here.
Here's what the owner said, "My mods are: jlt cold air, sct 93 Octane tune, 3" castless x-pipe and factory axle back. That's it". He even offered to take pics and send them to me if you want.
Here's what the owner said, "My mods are: jlt cold air, sct 93 Octane tune, 3" castless x-pipe and factory axle back. That's it". He even offered to take pics and send them to me if you want.
10-08-2012, 02:58 PM
#42
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: S. FL/TX
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol im not pissed... i just believe its another internet happy dyno. A full bolt on (headers, boss mani, full exhaust, etc) made 410whp on the dyno i made 418 on. I also know i would beat a full bolt on gt...regardless of what the dyno sheets say. Im not referring to the ones that trap 124-125. But the basic full bolt on cars.
Not all cars run the same regardless of dyno numbers.
Im almost stunned that you are even bothering with this argument. You should know that dyno numbers dont mean jack ****. Its all about how the car rolls out and this car rolls... out.
Correct
I agree, very impressive indeed.
10-08-2012, 03:02 PM
#43
Who is eddie?
What makes you think that he had cats? Its catless.. I didnt add it on the video but the guy is also tunned.
Another friend of mine had his 5.0 with filter, x pipe, mufflers and tune 5.0 hit 400rwhp on a MUSTANG DYNO thats about 425ish on a regular dyno. They both raced and the mustang you are questioning right now beat him really bad.
Not all cars run the same regardless of dyno numbers.
Im almost stunned that you are even bothering with this argument. You should know that dyno numbers dont mean jack ****. Its all about how the car rolls out and this car rolls... out.
Correct
I jerk off to dyno numbers...
I agree, very impressive indeed.
What makes you think that he had cats? Its catless.. I didnt add it on the video but the guy is also tunned.
Another friend of mine had his 5.0 with filter, x pipe, mufflers and tune 5.0 hit 400rwhp on a MUSTANG DYNO thats about 425ish on a regular dyno. They both raced and the mustang you are questioning right now beat him really bad.
Not all cars run the same regardless of dyno numbers.
Im almost stunned that you are even bothering with this argument. You should know that dyno numbers dont mean jack ****. Its all about how the car rolls out and this car rolls... out.
Correct
I jerk off to dyno numbers...
I agree, very impressive indeed.
10-08-2012, 03:03 PM
#44
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: S. FL/TX
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just got in touch with the owner and like I suspected he hasn't been on a dyno yet. I believe the 430 is Zyborg's estimate based on how it hangs with him compared to other 5.0s with known dyno #s. Personally I think he's closer to 400 because he's had trouble with a 400hp Evo here.
Here's what the owner said, "My mods are: jlt cold air, sct 93 Octane tune, 3" castless x-pipe and factory axle back. That's it". He even offered to take pics and send them to me if you want.
Here's what the owner said, "My mods are: jlt cold air, sct 93 Octane tune, 3" castless x-pipe and factory axle back. That's it". He even offered to take pics and send them to me if you want.
an evo is a way lighter car with way more traction so its not a surprise..
Driver is fucki9ing BEAST. But the car also runs well... I have ran other guys in 5.0s that were badass drivers and they still got killed much worse....
10-08-2012, 03:52 PM
#49
idk man... your car performs awesome for its mods. Any other c5z with your mods id say i would pull on...but yours is stout. So idk. Either way. I think it would be closer then you and that 5.0 in this vid..regardless of the outcome
10-08-2012, 06:03 PM
#52
10-08-2012, 08:18 PM
#55
Teching In
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: I come from a dusty place.
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He admitted to me earlier that he tells people he guesses 430-440. I guess after today's questions he has revised the numbers a little bit. lol ...Said he could really **** people off by telling people 400. Said he would go get it dyno'd soon.
10-08-2012, 08:34 PM
#56
Yeah he was the camera guy in the 5.0 on a lot of the vids I saw yesterday on FB.
He admitted to me earlier that he tells people he guesses 430-440. I guess after today's questions he has revised the numbers a little bit. lol ...Said he could really **** people off by telling people 400. Said he would go get it dyno'd soon.
He admitted to me earlier that he tells people he guesses 430-440. I guess after today's questions he has revised the numbers a little bit. lol ...Said he could really **** people off by telling people 400. Said he would go get it dyno'd soon.
10-08-2012, 08:55 PM
#57
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: S. FL/TX
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah he was the camera guy in the 5.0 on a lot of the vids I saw yesterday on FB.
He admitted to me earlier that he tells people he guesses 430-440. I guess after today's questions he has revised the numbers a little bit. lol ...Said he could really **** people off by telling people 400. Said he would go get it dyno'd soon.
He admitted to me earlier that he tells people he guesses 430-440. I guess after today's questions he has revised the numbers a little bit. lol ...Said he could really **** people off by telling people 400. Said he would go get it dyno'd soon.
lets see the video....
10-08-2012, 09:58 PM
#60
Parsero nice job, i see you still doing your thing banging them gears and she still purrring ... , I wish you were here to run my cammed/stall t/a which i know you'll beat but should be close
Last edited by PaSteLaSo4U; 10-08-2012 at 10:03 PM.