H/c Ta vs bolt on 5.0 and C6
10-25-2012, 07:44 AM
#41
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes I would. I don't care what your car runs or who you have beat. I would put my car against ANY h/c ls1. well, thats full weight...lol. track times and dyno # don't mean anything. btw - we are talking about from a roll on the street.
Last edited by 00silverGTP; 10-25-2012 at 08:08 AM.
10-25-2012, 08:00 AM
#42
Teching In
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah its completely irrelevant track times or trap speeds clear across america....same goes for dyno numbers....just way to many variables come into play. Your car runs good man.
10-25-2012, 08:22 AM
#43
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Grove City, Oh
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is a video of me racing a h/c ta that made 433/398 when my car was bolt ons.
http://youtu.be/6o2bYPahgS4
Here is me racing 00silverGTP in this video when I was bolt ons. This car makes alot less power but runs just as strong as the other ta.
http://youtu.be/wtFyUvP347k
http://youtu.be/6o2bYPahgS4
Here is me racing 00silverGTP in this video when I was bolt ons. This car makes alot less power but runs just as strong as the other ta.
http://youtu.be/wtFyUvP347k
10-25-2012, 08:47 AM
#46
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
to be honest you couldn't even pull away from a Bolt on LS2 C6, BayAreaSS ran door to door with my Stock C6Z 50-125. I would of freight trained Lilmiller when he was bolt ons
10-25-2012, 09:31 AM
#47
Maybe one day people will understand no 2 cars are the same. No 2 dynos are the same. You cant say any full bolt on 5.0 will beat any full bolt on h/c ls1...and vise versa... you wanna know who wins the race in the end?
The guy with more money. Theres always something you can do to make a car faster. The term full bolt on is shady in itself... cars are never full bolt on because theres always something you can do to it to make it faster. I know of h/c ls1s that struggle to trap 115. I know of h/c ls1 that trap 130.
No matter how you swing it, the cars in the video are decent running. The 5.0 edged out the TA motor to motor, and the h/c ls2 vette edged out the 5.0 motor to motor. To me... theres nothing wrong with any of the cars. The sooner people realize 5.0s can trap into the 120s with bolt ons, the sooner they will see the light in most races. Hell mine might go into the 120s with ricer mods. That is all
The guy with more money. Theres always something you can do to make a car faster. The term full bolt on is shady in itself... cars are never full bolt on because theres always something you can do to it to make it faster. I know of h/c ls1s that struggle to trap 115. I know of h/c ls1 that trap 130.
No matter how you swing it, the cars in the video are decent running. The 5.0 edged out the TA motor to motor, and the h/c ls2 vette edged out the 5.0 motor to motor. To me... theres nothing wrong with any of the cars. The sooner people realize 5.0s can trap into the 120s with bolt ons, the sooner they will see the light in most races. Hell mine might go into the 120s with ricer mods. That is all
10-25-2012, 10:00 AM
#49
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Grove City, Oh
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe one day people will understand no 2 cars are the same. No 2 dynos are the same. You cant say any full bolt on 5.0 will beat any full bolt on h/c ls1...and vise versa... you wanna know who wins the race in the end?
The guy with more money. Theres always something you can do to make a car faster. The term full bolt on is shady in itself... cars are never full bolt on because theres always something you can do to it to make it faster. I know of h/c ls1s that struggle to trap 115. I know of h/c ls1 that trap 130.
No matter how you swing it, the cars in the video are decent running. The 5.0 edged out the TA motor to motor, and the h/c ls2 vette edged out the 5.0 motor to motor. To me... theres nothing wrong with any of the cars. The sooner people realize 5.0s can trap into the 120s with bolt ons, the sooner they will see the light in most races. Hell mine might go into the 120s with ricer mods. That is all
The guy with more money. Theres always something you can do to make a car faster. The term full bolt on is shady in itself... cars are never full bolt on because theres always something you can do to it to make it faster. I know of h/c ls1s that struggle to trap 115. I know of h/c ls1 that trap 130.
No matter how you swing it, the cars in the video are decent running. The 5.0 edged out the TA motor to motor, and the h/c ls2 vette edged out the 5.0 motor to motor. To me... theres nothing wrong with any of the cars. The sooner people realize 5.0s can trap into the 120s with bolt ons, the sooner they will see the light in most races. Hell mine might go into the 120s with ricer mods. That is all
10-25-2012, 10:05 AM
#50
10-25-2012, 10:09 AM
#51
Teching In
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/hot...1_small_block/
10-25-2012, 10:20 AM
#52
6.2L, 11.5:1 compression from the factory and Direct Injection.
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/hot...1_small_block/
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/hot...1_small_block/
10-25-2012, 10:56 AM
#56
Teching In
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll have to agree with AWTBSS. I wouldn't necessarily put a MS3/243 setup at the top of the LS1 food chain imo. It's a solid combo for sure, but there are more proven ones out there. I think you're getting a bit ahead of yourself here.
10-25-2012, 10:58 AM
#57
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ya, cuz not being able to beat a not even full bolt ls2 means u can run next to any h/c ls1. Specially one that runs with c6zs.....
You made a really stupid blanket statement
You made a really stupid blanket statement
10-25-2012, 11:00 AM
#58
please do. Im not a fan of direct injection in the aspect of griming up valves. If they 100% solved that issue, then great... if not... they might be in the same boat as some of the euro guys (cylinder head tear down and cleaning) every 20k miles. If they found a way to filter the oil vapors or something.. factory catch cans maybe. Im curious to know what they did.
10-25-2012, 11:09 AM
#59
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but you agree that a car from cali would beat a car in ohio b/c he thinks so??? lol, Like I said thats bench racing. I bet lilmiller would have loved to run a stock c6z when he was bolt ons.....