h/c ls2 vette Vs bone stock c6z Vs 2010 Lamborghini Superleggera
#63
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Some stock Z's are just factory freaks. I am very surprised you pulled on that Lambo. I raced both a stock 06 Z and a Supperleggera with my old C6 and was pulled by both. My car was an A6 LS2 with a yank SS 3600, L76 top end and Gt-11 cam. Made 440 rwhp. I too thought I had the Z06.
Camera car is a 2.9 whipple cobra.
Lambo race
Camera car is a 2.9 whipple cobra.
Lambo race
#64
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Waffle Land
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am surprised that you pulled on the SL. Older, base gallardos are slow as ***** but the newer Superleggeras trap in the mid 120mph range. It should have been a good race for the Z06 and a win for the SL if it was an E-gear car.
#65
STOCK Z06's range from 430whp to 460whp...STOCK....but I can see a factory freak or two...the proof is in the pudding...it pulled the OP's car hard.
So its either stock or not stock...who cares...
Nice job finding a Lambo to play....what a sound
So its either stock or not stock...who cares...
Nice job finding a Lambo to play....what a sound
#71
LMAO claaassiic!!!!
BTW, we have a guy here in AZ that made 454whp with a bone stock 07 C6Z. And thats on shitty 91oct in shitty AZ weather. Im not sure where the OP is from but I know that my car lost 23whp when I moved from STL to Phoenix. : ( So using ricer math his car with 93oct and better air could have made 475ish... What I am saying is there are freaks out there. Don't forget that every LS7 is hand built...
BTW, we have a guy here in AZ that made 454whp with a bone stock 07 C6Z. And thats on shitty 91oct in shitty AZ weather. Im not sure where the OP is from but I know that my car lost 23whp when I moved from STL to Phoenix. : ( So using ricer math his car with 93oct and better air could have made 475ish... What I am saying is there are freaks out there. Don't forget that every LS7 is hand built...
#72
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
Lambo sounds amazing....As for the Z, he pulled the draws off the LS2 and the Lambo! If an 83 year old man had it, I would say it's likely to be stock, but you never know. I would look at the tune if there are no visible mods on the car, or maybe another dyno run to back up the numbers?
#74
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Grove City, Oh
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#76
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
Solid runs dude. All the cars ran hard and sounded sick!
I was at the dyno day as well. Brians dyno is not a happy dyno. When my car was at 600whp i raced a car that made 570-580 on a mustang dyno. He had about a 350lb weight advantage over me (im 3600lb) and we were pretty much dead even. That car also ran 10.7 at 133. Everything makes makes pretty good sense..
There was also another brand new(700mi) Z06 that laid 470 down. Dude literally just bought it. Does no one remember that GM rated the LS1 at like 330hp or less but it was laying down 320 stock?? This wouldnt be the first time they underrated something for marketing purposes.
I was at the dyno day as well. Brians dyno is not a happy dyno. When my car was at 600whp i raced a car that made 570-580 on a mustang dyno. He had about a 350lb weight advantage over me (im 3600lb) and we were pretty much dead even. That car also ran 10.7 at 133. Everything makes makes pretty good sense..
There was also another brand new(700mi) Z06 that laid 470 down. Dude literally just bought it. Does no one remember that GM rated the LS1 at like 330hp or less but it was laying down 320 stock?? This wouldnt be the first time they underrated something for marketing purposes.
Last edited by Ryans99ls1; 05-23-2013 at 12:03 PM.
#77
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL either way I need an up grade considering cars are coming stock with more rwhp than mine. Yea I know my car is much older and his is a completely different car in a completely different class and a Corvette is the typical car that most Fbodies upgrade too but do I blame them? nope not for a sec because its the obvious choice and apparently the right choice.
#78
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Grove City, Oh
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Solid runs dude. All the cars ran hard and sounded sick!
I was at the dyno day as well. Brians dyno is not a happy dyno. When my car was at 600whp i raced a car that made 570-580 on a mustang dyno. He had about a 350lb weight advantage over me (im 3600lb) and we were pretty much dead even. That car also ran 10.7 at 133. Everything makes makes pretty good sense..
There was also another brand new(700mi) Z06 that laid 470 down. Dude literally just bought it. Does no one remember that GM rated the LS1 at like 330hp or less but it was laying down 320 stock?? This wouldnt be the first time they underrated something for marketing purposes.
I was at the dyno day as well. Brians dyno is not a happy dyno. When my car was at 600whp i raced a car that made 570-580 on a mustang dyno. He had about a 350lb weight advantage over me (im 3600lb) and we were pretty much dead even. That car also ran 10.7 at 133. Everything makes makes pretty good sense..
There was also another brand new(700mi) Z06 that laid 470 down. Dude literally just bought it. Does no one remember that GM rated the LS1 at like 330hp or less but it was laying down 320 stock?? This wouldnt be the first time they underrated something for marketing purposes.
Yep I agree! I have had two of my cars on his dyno from bolt-on's to h/c and they have all made average numbers for there setups. Hell there was a ported and pullied cobra on his dyno two days ago that only made 473.