2010 SS Cam/spray vs 2012 5.0 Built engine F1 Procharger.
05-10-2013, 12:02 AM
#61
Good run and kill rhino. Glad you got to come down to No Problem and hang with my boys from Futral and get your personal best et.
I have to agree that the 5.0 should be way faster and make better power for its mods but at the end of the day it's not setup as well as the Camaro and got waxed plain and simple.
I have to agree that the 5.0 should be way faster and make better power for its mods but at the end of the day it's not setup as well as the Camaro and got waxed plain and simple.
05-10-2013, 06:22 AM
#63
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Why??? because your dumbass didn't understand what I was saying.
Simple pump e85 is not simple pump by the the time you convert a real pump car to e85. Get over it........just the way it is.
What I was saying was you can't compare those cars you posted because they were on a gas......and I knew it. Just as Rhino's run the 5.0 was probably on 93. That alone could lead to the performance difference.
What I was saying was you can't compare those cars you posted because they were on a gas......and I knew it. Just as Rhino's run the 5.0 was probably on 93. That alone could lead to the performance difference.
05-10-2013, 06:46 AM
#64
Why??? because your dumbass didn't understand what I was saying.
Simple pump e85 is not simple pump by the the time you convert a real pump car to e85. Get over it........just the way it is.
What I was saying was you can't compare those cars you posted because they were on a gas......and I knew it. Just as Rhino's run the 5.0 was probably on 93. That alone could lead to the performance difference.
Simple pump e85 is not simple pump by the the time you convert a real pump car to e85. Get over it........just the way it is.
What I was saying was you can't compare those cars you posted because they were on a gas......and I knew it. Just as Rhino's run the 5.0 was probably on 93. That alone could lead to the performance difference.
Not to mention I can show some blown 5.0's on 93 in the mid 9's as well on less boost and 93. Plain simple no matter what pump this car is on it dont run like it should.
05-10-2013, 07:04 AM
#65
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
How is it not pump? He didn't have to convert nothing but tune it just like he did when he put the blower on it. E85 is pump gas and as many times as we have been over this your the only one thats thinks its not.
Not to mention I can show some blown 5.0's on 93 in the mid 9's as well on less boost and 93. Plain simple no matter what pump this car is on it dont run like it should.
Not to mention I can show some blown 5.0's on 93 in the mid 9's as well on less boost and 93. Plain simple no matter what pump this car is on it dont run like it should.
Remember when you guys give me a hard time about not all ls6's trap 130+ mph......that not all blown 5.0's trap 145 mph either.
Last edited by HioSSilver; 05-10-2013 at 07:09 AM.
05-10-2013, 12:05 PM
#67
Do a search on here. I've seen many post that say there is no e85 in their area....not just me and my area. Face it, you just don't go fill up on e85 like you think. It takes injectors, fuel pump or pumps and possibly new/larger fuel line because you need 1/3 more of it. Still not all pumps are meant to work with e-85 and they can say their life expectancy may be shortened on e85. Not as simple as you make it sound.
Remember when you guys give me a hard time about not all ls6's trap 130+ mph......that not all blown 5.0's trap 145 mph either.
Remember when you guys give me a hard time about not all ls6's trap 130+ mph......that not all blown 5.0's trap 145 mph either.
05-10-2013, 12:37 PM
#71
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why??? because your dumbass didn't understand what I was saying.
Simple pump e85 is not simple pump by the the time you convert a real pump car to e85. Get over it........just the way it is.
What I was saying was you can't compare those cars you posted because they were on a gas......and I knew it. Just as Rhino's run the 5.0 was probably on 93. That alone could lead to the performance difference.
Simple pump e85 is not simple pump by the the time you convert a real pump car to e85. Get over it........just the way it is.
What I was saying was you can't compare those cars you posted because they were on a gas......and I knew it. Just as Rhino's run the 5.0 was probably on 93. That alone could lead to the performance difference.
05-10-2013, 01:30 PM
#72
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
It doesn't even take fuel lines and bunch other shut to run E85 in the 5.0's. Injector and tune. Which oh wow he needs injectors for the blower. And E85 is a lot of places. And once get to certain point you need return style fuel system on 93/E85/racegas. Which if he is running 17lbs on any fuel he needs a fuel system. E85 is pump and been debated plenty. And just cs not in every area dont change that. If you think that then 93 isnt either as its not everywhere.
93 is not every where....but mostly every everywhere and that's more than you can say about e85. 89 is only available in some area's, but that's due to high altitude so 93 is not needed. What's your point?
That car on 93 is a low 130 car. Rhino once the converter is locked is likely a high 130 car....you figure it out.
05-10-2013, 02:05 PM
#73
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now your talking different ****. Your saying bolt-ons and e85 is a tune and a injector change away.....for sure for most **** Eisenstein. Then you admit a complete fuel system is needed once you get to a certain point. Maybe this 5.0 didn't have that but had a built bottom instead. So many variables.
93 is not every where....but mostly every everywhere and that's more than you can say about e85. 89 is only available in some area's, but that's due to high altitude so 93 is not needed. What's your point?
Just like e85 is not always e85.
That car on 93 is a low 130 car. Rhino once the converter is locked is likely a high 130 car....you figure it out.
93 is not every where....but mostly every everywhere and that's more than you can say about e85. 89 is only available in some area's, but that's due to high altitude so 93 is not needed. What's your point?
Just like e85 is not always e85.
That car on 93 is a low 130 car. Rhino once the converter is locked is likely a high 130 car....you figure it out.
05-10-2013, 02:50 PM
#74
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
That's right ....and he didn't spray the whole track and the converter is not optimized for spray. According to this thread. Comprehend much??? Spraying the whole track would likely lead to more mph.......or at least so I'm told.
05-10-2013, 03:22 PM
#78
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He already said he is hoping for ~135 derp.