06 GTO vs Heads/Cam Foxbody
05-23-2013, 08:18 PM
#1
06 GTO vs Heads/Cam Foxbody Y'all satisfied? This a better matchup?
GTO:
-Vararam
-Ported TB
-FAST102
-Kooks SS Headers
-Catless
-Corsa
-3.91 Gears
-HPTuners
-401rwhp
-3915lbs as raced with 1 extra passenger
FoxBody:
-302CI
-CAI
-Trick Flow Intake
-Trick Flow Heads
-F303 Cam
-3.73 Gears
-310rwhp
-3240lbs as raced with 1 extra passenger
Last edited by 409CISecondGen; 05-24-2013 at 11:58 PM.
05-23-2013, 09:33 PM
#5
http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthr...698&highlight=
His advantage is his weight, he needs to keep it to as low a roll as possible. From my vantage point in my driver's seat, second was close and he only fell back to my mirror. By the end of third he was at the back of my door, and in fourth it was no contest. He had dropped out of my peripheral vision and I was pulling away quickly, we hit the brake marker and I shut down. I really wish my video had been useable, because it seems alot better from his view.
Last edited by 409CISecondGen; 05-23-2013 at 09:46 PM.
05-23-2013, 11:02 PM
#6
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indy
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm surprised the Fox hung in that long. I'm no 5.0 expert but H/C/I and making 300rwhp? Sounds like a poor combo to me. There are cammed 4.6 2Vs that make that. Good kill btw.
05-23-2013, 11:07 PM
#8
Naw those numbers are pretty common with a H/C/I setup like that.
Last edited by adamantium; 05-23-2013 at 11:14 PM.
05-24-2013, 01:38 AM
#9
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-24-2013, 09:01 AM
#10
05-24-2013, 05:40 PM
#16
05-24-2013, 06:17 PM
#17
Teching In
Join Date: May 2011
Location: manning sc
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats spot on for that combo. To get much more that that he needs more cubes or a more wild combo. The LS engines really spoiled people on what kind of power engines make and really got the ball rolling on the performance war. Im willing to bet there never would have been a termi if the ls1 wasnt beating the pants off the mustangs. Back then I had to get an n20 kit just to keep up in my 4.6 gt. In 1998 300 rwhp was a monster and the ls1's were doing that off the show room floor. He did better than I thought he would.
05-24-2013, 06:24 PM
#18
Thats spot on for that combo. To get much more that that he needs more cubes or a more wild combo. The LS engines really spoiled people on what kind of power engines make and really got the ball rolling on the performance war. Im willing to bet there never would have been a termi if the ls1 wasnt beating the pants off the mustangs. Back then I had to get an n20 kit just to keep up in my 4.6 gt. In 1998 300 rwhp was a monster and the ls1's were doing that off the show room floor. He did better than I thought he would.
05-24-2013, 06:29 PM
#19
Teching In
Join Date: May 2011
Location: manning sc
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Crazy isnt it. Bet the 409 didnt have 1/3 the street manners or gas milege. I damn sure wouldnt want to drive mine everyday and Im not making the power you are. I just like the old school feel but for something that u drive more than 25 miles a week ac and power steering sure are nice.
05-24-2013, 06:37 PM
#20
Thats spot on for that combo. To get much more that that he needs more cubes or a more wild combo. The LS engines really spoiled people on what kind of power engines make and really got the ball rolling on the performance war. Im willing to bet there never would have been a termi if the ls1 wasnt beating the pants off the mustangs. Back then I had to get an n20 kit just to keep up in my 4.6 gt. In 1998 300 rwhp was a monster and the ls1's were doing that off the show room floor. He did better than I thought he would.
