automach1

Wow so they wanted a link to a max effort 2v setup and when I post them all I get is No wai

Yes the car is quite light just like max ls setups.

automach1

Typical Hio tactics when presented with facts you go off subject and talk about the irrelevant. However since you changed the subject tell me what that racecar of yours runs again?

TitanTransAm

Much faster than your racecar, buddy. And it's just absolutely hysterical to me how much you troll this forum about how fast mustangs are in the hands of ''informed'' people, like you portray yourself to be. But yet you can't do **** with your own.

automach1

Wrong my car is stock. I do plenty of **** with my car and have the vids to prove it. More then you can say for now

TitanTransAm

There you go again with your bullshit. Lol where's the videos of you setting records then? Please enlighten me, dipshit. And your car is stock, right. And I've walked on the ******* Moon. LOL

Bengi09

I don't care enough about them to research it any further, Just curious on how you came across this car.

automach1

So you are saying you have to set records to be informed? My car has a lot of stock parts unlike your racecar.

automach1

That car is the n/a 2v record holder. It has been 9.65 and will probably go faster.

TitanTransAm

So your ''stock'' 07 GT500 just happens to have 150rwhp more than all the other stock ones. Let me guess, factory freak right?

automach1

Yup....

JC316

iTrader: (1)

I stand corrected on the NA 2v in the 9's, but it's hardly a daily driver. At 2700lbs race weight, it's gutted. As for the 5.4 making more power than the LS1, I said without boost, it can't hold a candle. Only one 5.4L has ever made more NA power than the LS1 stock and that is the 5.4L DOHC out of the 2000 Cobra R, but that particular motor was a limited production and more comparable to the LS6.

A H/C/I modular vs a H/C/I LS1, the LS engine wins every time.

LS1rob00

iTrader: (9)

Heater

Looks like a duel of the trolls between Automach and TitanTransAm.


Need to have a internet cage match between the two and the loser gets the ban.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Now put that pos in a truck and think how sad they are........and people bought that ****.
Not really. Local guy went 9's with a old school 283 damn near 30 yrs ago.

i see autostupid is still spewing dumb ****.......now bolt-on 2v's goes faster than his junk. But he has a 5.4 ,blower and bolt-ons. Makes perfect sense. Keeps posting the same race car over and over too......but there is a whole pile of 2v's in the 9's.

automach1

There is more then one derp.

automach1

Sure show a stock cube ls1 making 600+ n/a

NW-99SS

iTrader: (6)

What HIO said. Autotroll doing his finest argueing against another 2V owner = priceless.

As for shop cars going 9's, Texas Speed put a stock bottom end LS1 into the 9's 4 years ago. Not sure why you keep hanging onto that arguement in every single 2V thread on tech when the OP raced a bolt-on 2V with a bone stock LS1 car.

Now go call me a derp, and interwebz insult me, ask for proof when telling others to do their own research, and whatever other crap you can come up with. The rest of us live in reality where it is known that it takes more effort and $$ to get a 2V to compete than an LS1. But please, carry on filling this site with your rambling and useless retorts.

Wait for it....

S8ER95Z

iTrader: (3)

I managed for 8 years...but the FRA/LID bit was just too damn cheap. haha Props to you... it's a bitch to avoid modding.

Turbo2vGT

Yay 2v

automach1

What reality is that? Tell me how many 9sec h/c n/a ls1 cars have you seen in person? The 2v was in the the 9s years ago as well. The h/c ls record car is just as light and is just as much of a racecar. A lot of compression RG etc... No need to call you a derp as you did to insult me first. I am just stating facts idc what car they own. Just because they had a 2v doesn't mean they knew what to do with it Oh and as far as money is concerned. You are right Texas speeds h/c ls1 record car could be duplicated for cheap