It'llrun

Pffft... nooooo...

Garret-SS

Okay the Stang I raced was a 6-speed with 4.10s. I texted him again to see what everything he has had done to it.

2011 Mustang
-6-speed w/ 4.10s
-Air raid CAI
- 93 octane race tune
- bigger throttle body

If u any of u guys remember the post of when i beat that 2008 GT bullit, that same mustang raced this 2011 stang. the GT beat it 6 times by about half a car length each time. So i am trying to understand how i beat the GT by 3 lengths, other then him under-shifting into 4th. Plus while talking to the GT guy we were trying to figure out why i loss so bad, and he says that the 2011 doesnt make anywhere close to 335 like u all said. He was guessing around 325. And I have no real clue how much horse i make other then looking up the GM specs for the 2002 Camaro SS, so im guessing i make less then what has been posted. and apparenltly i have 3.23 gears. And the flowmaster exhaust is what my dad put on it like 3 weeks after he got it from the dealership back in 02'. idk he likes it lol.

anyway this kid must be bull shitting me with his calculations. so... thoughts?


Heres a video of my car going about 0-60. I didnt floor but it push it a bit hard. Video of the Speed and RPMs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRAzA...ature=youtu.be

Mike Morris

iTrader: (55)

When is the last time car had fresh plugs and 02s? Clean your maf as well. You should have beaten that car easy. That V6 is maybe a 13.7 car

Irunelevens

With the right driver I imagine it could do a little better than that, since they have gone 13.7 stock.

Fooln Ya

I went 13.78 @ 102 stock with 2.73s. With 3.73s, tune, jlt cai, o/r xpipe, tire I went 13.30 @ 105. 12.7 with full exhaust and ported tb. Pointless point but just saying.

MACHXLR8

325hp "to the wheels" is way over estimating the hp of the V6 Stang. In addition, his torque is much lower than yours assuming your car is running correct.
The only thing I could say is that his gears might have jumped him out to a good lead on the initial hit and he ended up holding it until you guys shut down. If you were to run it out longer, eventually you would have caught him.
With you having an Auto, there is also a delay for you. This, in conjunction with his gears and 6-speed gave him the jump and you ended up playing catch-up.

hugger1975

iTrader: (3)

The thing with those v6 is with mods and some gears the get out the hole.

Look at the traps above. An avg fbody (and hell even my school bus...lol) can trap what fooln did.
But they damn sure run some good et.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Fuel filter too.

MACHXLR8

...and re-angle the blades on the Tornado..
LOL

jk.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Basic tune up is essential Mach.

OP....have you ever checked wot? I've seen several fcars not be able to go wot.

OneSlowV

iTrader: (2)

Looks like the LS guys should trade in there slow ls1 for a V6 stang lmao

Mike Morris

iTrader: (55)

A V6 stang is not going 13.7s down here in pea soup FL where the OP is for sure. And even if it could OP should have clobbered that car. V6 stang won and that is final and no excuses. Now lets help the OP find out why.

Irunelevens

Agreed, but without any track numbers from the OP all we can use is what either car would run at sea level.

"MAC"

iTrader: (1)

So your saying that 3:73 gears with a 3600 stall would do nothing for the car? I highly disagree with you just from my personal experience alone. With my set up and most my power starting around 3500 rpm's my gears and stall (3600 btw) it fell's very different! Hell when I just had headers, lid, full exhaust done my trans blew and then I had it rebuilt with a 3600 stall put in and even the guy who runs the Sun shine drag strip down in Tampa Fl even said it would run a lot better and it did. Also you saying "Again wrong" regarding to my other statement what part of that is wrong do explain. Because the 60E trans is a garbage trans so thats not wrong, If your reffering to me saying a 4000 stall and 4:10 gears is a good match up then I can see that being wrong because IDK on that but i could see how that would be a better match up than a 3600 stall with 4:10 gears and depending on what kinda stall he puts in should depend where he wants his power band to start. Thats why after I put a 3600 stall in mine I made sure to have good power around 3500 to 3600 rpm's. So just saying wrong is pointless do explain as to why you think im wrong.

Irunelevens

Out of curiosity Mac, how old are you?

"MAC"

iTrader: (1)

Im 24 man i just dont like how someone says im wrong and thats it if im wrong on something then say why so I know not to give bad info to the next guy, figured that was common sense on here guess not. Ive had plenty of people tell me to use 3:73 gears with my 3600 stall so I bought them. Also I had a couple of tuners tell me that as well, that way it can be more street friendly. like I said I bought the stall first so I built the car *** backwards. truth be told I should of built the car like this (IMO that is) suspension, rear end, transmission, then motor/engine (what ever you prefer). Like I said if im wrong then explain why im wrong considering you have to be so politically correct on here give me facts as to why im wrong

"MAC"

iTrader: (1)

So again how am I wrong do explain please

black_phoenix

iTrader: (27)

damn, so let me get this straight, light bolt on mustangs are smoking ls1's now? Kewl OP have your car fixed, or burned...

ohioborn80

iTrader: (2)

Light bolt on V6 mustangs

Sail Hatan

Flow master car with a bad tranny? I think that's your issue.