Tracked350z vs KFC_Or_Bust Callout Video
01-06-2014, 08:16 AM
#22
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01-06-2014, 09:51 AM
#25
ASSuming On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You should google stock car specs and use that to compare, too.
01-07-2014, 08:42 AM
#26
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So I'm amazing for stating the facts? Fact is he traps 104 and you should trap well over 110.... Our cars are rated 13.0 @ 108 mph stock. /thread
Last edited by 4PointSlow; 01-07-2014 at 08:49 AM.
01-07-2014, 08:58 AM
#27
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I watched his m3 video and he gets walked hard on by dodge calibers with fart cans. LMAO. C'mon man you need to see whats up with your car it should pull harder, do compression test or get on a dyno and get a tune. 
01-07-2014, 09:04 AM
#28
Rated? Most reviews had ls1 cars running 105mph... Only a few select had 106+ traps. Nearly every automatic ls1 car I've been around managed 104-105 traps here at Cordova (where I went 107-108 stock). Not every ls1 car will pull 108 traps... In my case it took perfect conditions to get 108 traps (slightly negative DA of -127ft). Ricer math ftw?
01-07-2014, 09:35 AM
#30
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At the very minimal a full bolt on ls1, especially a 6 speed, should trap 108... I did 110 trap untuned with it bouncing off the limiter and pulling timing all through 3rd. In positive DA, our track is 1500 feet above sea level.
01-07-2014, 02:21 PM
#31
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
M3's are rated the same. Some have hit 107-109 stock. Every track is different. My run was done in 78* heat in South Carolina during the summer. Definitely not optimal if you compare the 1427' da to a fall time negative da track. Look a little less into the trap speed because there is too many variables.
01-07-2014, 02:57 PM
#32
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where the **** do you get off thinking the camaro traps 104. the car went 13.5@106 paper filter stock. On garbage *** all seasons. Do some digging next time.
01-07-2014, 03:27 PM
#33
On The Tree
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chattanooga, tn
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01-07-2014, 04:31 PM
#34
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyway, the Camaro went 13.64 @ 105.4 bone stock with poop tires. Haven't had a clean pass with the mods yet, best was 13.3 @ 107 in 3000+ DA humidness, also on poop tires, ricer math DA corrected to 12.9 @ 110. Ran 13.3 @ 104 in cool weather slamming on the brakes before the line because of vibrations. Ordered trans and torque arm mount, if that fixes the vibration I'll go to the track and crack off a 12 second pass before Texas comes back to normal and is 90 degrees every night we go to the track lol.