Bolt on 5.0 vs Cam only C5Z
01-13-2014, 12:21 PM
#22
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes
on
31 Posts
I know, mind blowing, right? That this example might ACTUALLY be "cam only"...and not cam only..............................plus 3342 bolt-ons, nitrous, stall, slicks, jet turbine, etc. 
01-13-2014, 12:47 PM
#24
10 Second Club
01-13-2014, 02:54 PM
#26
Teching In
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01-13-2014, 08:09 PM
#32
On The Tree
01-13-2014, 08:15 PM
#33
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doug has lots of "little" things that add up to give him a considerable amount more power than a "typical" bolt-on LS6 would have. Which is awesome, until you consistently try to belittle anyone that doesn't do exactly the same thing. Case in point.
01-14-2014, 08:26 AM
#36
12 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My car did 402rwhp with just headers, intake, and tune on a Mustang dyno. Add a cam, FAST intake, UD pulley, and a lightweight clutch and it might just get there.
My WS6 with TFS 215 heads, cam, fast intake, did 455rwhp on the same dyno.
01-14-2014, 08:39 AM
#37
I know that seems like a lot cam only but I think it might just be possible.
My car did 402rwhp with just headers, intake, and tune on a Mustang dyno. Add a cam, FAST intake, UD pulley, and a lightweight clutch and it might just get there.
My WS6 with TFS 215 heads, cam, fast intake, did 455rwhp on the same dyno.
My car did 402rwhp with just headers, intake, and tune on a Mustang dyno. Add a cam, FAST intake, UD pulley, and a lightweight clutch and it might just get there.
My WS6 with TFS 215 heads, cam, fast intake, did 455rwhp on the same dyno.
So let me get this straight
You think it possible for a LS6 with bolt ons to make 450
Yet your H/C/I car made 455
I'm not hating just wondering what logic there is in that
01-14-2014, 08:59 AM
#38
10 Second Club
01-14-2014, 09:19 AM
#40
I know that seems like a lot cam only but I think it might just be possible.
My car did 402rwhp with just headers, intake, and tune on a Mustang dyno. Add a cam, FAST intake, UD pulley, and a lightweight clutch and it might just get there.
My WS6 with TFS 215 heads, cam, fast intake, did 455rwhp on the same dyno.
My car did 402rwhp with just headers, intake, and tune on a Mustang dyno. Add a cam, FAST intake, UD pulley, and a lightweight clutch and it might just get there.
My WS6 with TFS 215 heads, cam, fast intake, did 455rwhp on the same dyno.