540 whp Stock ZR1 vs 608 whp 2012 Roush 5.0
#21
Bone-Stock on Stock Tires
==================
Rank~~ E.T.~~ Trap~ 60'~ Driver~~~~~ M.Yr. Details Thread Video
1~~~~ 10.664 132.92 1.68 Kyle Lemish ~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
2~~~~ 10.740 133.21 1.74 Kyle Lemish ~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
3~~~~ 10.794 132.21 1.80 jamie furman ~ 2009 details~~ thread
4~~~~ 10.851 129.89 1.70 racerns ~~~~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
5~~~~ 10.950 131.61 1.83 VY ZR1 ~~~~~ 2009 details
6~~~~ 11.071 129.87 1.87 SlowZo6 ~~~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
7~~~~ 11.235 125.99 1.99 Incon306~~~~ 2010 details
8~~~~ 11.626 125.33 1.97 DebRedZR1~~~2010 details~~ thread
So, the average of the top 8 in the forum is 130.13. time slips mandatory to be on the list. Give or take 2 mph for fuel level, fuel quality, weight of driver, DA and a few other variables, I was spot on. I also had a cobra with 595 rwhp that trapped 128 and was 4100 lbs. Not dyno racing, these are real numbers.
#22
These are the c6z times
The C6 Z06 Fast List
Last Updated: March 1, 2014
==================
Bone-Stock on Stock Tires
==================
Rank~~ E.T.~~ Trap~ 60'~ Driver~~~~~ M.Yr. Details Thread Video
1~~~~ 10.981 128.90 1.77 Jamie Furman~ 2006 details~~ thread
2~~~~ 11.025 127.25 1.70 Ranger ~~~~~ 2006 details~~ thread video
3~~~~ 11.177 127.08 1.79 walterm32~~~ 2008 details~~ thread
4~~~~ 11.242 122.38 1.68 Dr.Ron ~~~~~ 2006 details~~ thread
5~~~~ 11.311 122.89 1.80 BLU-BY-U ~~~ 2006 details~~ thread
6~~~~ 11.349 124.97 1.75 zosix427 ~~~~ 2006 details~~
7~~~~ 11.392 124.84 1.92 C5 Frank ~~~~ 2006 details~~ thread
8~~~~ 11.429 124.88 1.86 dgdoc ~~~~~~ 2006 details~~ thread video
9~~~~ 11.443 125.93 1.95 O7zeeO6 ~~~~ 2007 details~~ thread
10 ~~~ 11.458 124.13 1.80 layjzay~~~~~~ 2006 details
125.84 avg
The C6 Z06 Fast List
Last Updated: March 1, 2014
==================
Bone-Stock on Stock Tires
==================
Rank~~ E.T.~~ Trap~ 60'~ Driver~~~~~ M.Yr. Details Thread Video
1~~~~ 10.981 128.90 1.77 Jamie Furman~ 2006 details~~ thread
2~~~~ 11.025 127.25 1.70 Ranger ~~~~~ 2006 details~~ thread video
3~~~~ 11.177 127.08 1.79 walterm32~~~ 2008 details~~ thread
4~~~~ 11.242 122.38 1.68 Dr.Ron ~~~~~ 2006 details~~ thread
5~~~~ 11.311 122.89 1.80 BLU-BY-U ~~~ 2006 details~~ thread
6~~~~ 11.349 124.97 1.75 zosix427 ~~~~ 2006 details~~
7~~~~ 11.392 124.84 1.92 C5 Frank ~~~~ 2006 details~~ thread
8~~~~ 11.429 124.88 1.86 dgdoc ~~~~~~ 2006 details~~ thread video
9~~~~ 11.443 125.93 1.95 O7zeeO6 ~~~~ 2007 details~~ thread
10 ~~~ 11.458 124.13 1.80 layjzay~~~~~~ 2006 details
125.84 avg
#25
Staging Lane
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: san antonio
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#26
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow. That's pitiful. But even close to equal power, the Corvette will ALWAYS have a big advantage. Weight, gearing, aerodynamics...everybody knows that Vettes are topend monsters that defy convention.
#30
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: In Uranus!
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On this pass he ran 128mph and I went 129mph. And no he didn't pull anything back from the launch.
Now I do know another guy with a 2011 5.0. Built bottom end motor all the other goodies and a turbo and he has been 9.70's@136mph so far Full weight. He's trying to get the bugs worked out of it.
#31
in all seriousness.... you would be surprised how many boosted 5.0s on facebook fan pages havent gone as fast as me (both et and mph) with there 600+whp cars even with my nothing to write home about track performance. Its a lot more common then you think. There are slow cars everywhere. Slapping a bunch of parts on a car doesnt make it fast. But everyone here already knows that
#32
10 Second Club
in all seriousness.... you would be surprised how many boosted 5.0s on facebook fan pages havent gone as fast as me (both et and mph) with there 600+whp cars even with my nothing to write home about track performance. Its a lot more common then you think. There are slow cars everywhere. Slapping a bunch of parts on a car doesnt make it fast. But everyone here already knows that
#33
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Georgetown, Tx
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
in all seriousness.... you would be surprised how many boosted 5.0s on facebook fan pages havent gone as fast as me (both et and mph) with there 600+whp cars even with my nothing to write home about track performance. Its a lot more common then you think. There are slow cars everywhere. Slapping a bunch of parts on a car doesnt make it fast. But everyone here already knows that
#34
7 Second Club
True that. It's about the driver, that day, on that track, at that exact moment. This is why in the challenge, I stress, my car can run 10's, low to mid 10's at that, but I'm not sure I can run 10's in my car. We'll see what happens. Now, from a roll like this race went down, there should be no excuses. HP and weight should be the only factors, so power to weight should win every time.
#35
True that. It's about the driver, that day, on that track, at that exact moment. This is why in the challenge, I stress, my car can run 10's, low to mid 10's at that, but I'm not sure I can run 10's in my car. We'll see what happens. Now, from a roll like this race went down, there should be no excuses. HP and weight should be the only factors, so power to weight should win every time.
#37
7 Second Club
I'm not so worried about you kicking my *** in the challenge now. lol
#38
This is from the corvette forum list.
Bone-Stock on Stock Tires
==================
Rank~~ E.T.~~ Trap~ 60'~ Driver~~~~~ M.Yr. Details Thread Video
1~~~~ 10.664 132.92 1.68 Kyle Lemish ~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
2~~~~ 10.740 133.21 1.74 Kyle Lemish ~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
3~~~~ 10.794 132.21 1.80 jamie furman ~ 2009 details~~ thread
4~~~~ 10.851 129.89 1.70 racerns ~~~~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
5~~~~ 10.950 131.61 1.83 VY ZR1 ~~~~~ 2009 details
6~~~~ 11.071 129.87 1.87 SlowZo6 ~~~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
7~~~~ 11.235 125.99 1.99 Incon306~~~~ 2010 details
8~~~~ 11.626 125.33 1.97 DebRedZR1~~~2010 details~~ thread
So, the average of the top 8 in the forum is 130.13. time slips mandatory to be on the list. Give or take 2 mph for fuel level, fuel quality, weight of driver, DA and a few other variables, I was spot on. I also had a cobra with 595 rwhp that trapped 128 and was 4100 lbs. Not dyno racing, these are real numbers.
Bone-Stock on Stock Tires
==================
Rank~~ E.T.~~ Trap~ 60'~ Driver~~~~~ M.Yr. Details Thread Video
1~~~~ 10.664 132.92 1.68 Kyle Lemish ~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
2~~~~ 10.740 133.21 1.74 Kyle Lemish ~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
3~~~~ 10.794 132.21 1.80 jamie furman ~ 2009 details~~ thread
4~~~~ 10.851 129.89 1.70 racerns ~~~~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
5~~~~ 10.950 131.61 1.83 VY ZR1 ~~~~~ 2009 details
6~~~~ 11.071 129.87 1.87 SlowZo6 ~~~~ 2009 details~~ thread video
7~~~~ 11.235 125.99 1.99 Incon306~~~~ 2010 details
8~~~~ 11.626 125.33 1.97 DebRedZR1~~~2010 details~~ thread
So, the average of the top 8 in the forum is 130.13. time slips mandatory to be on the list. Give or take 2 mph for fuel level, fuel quality, weight of driver, DA and a few other variables, I was spot on. I also had a cobra with 595 rwhp that trapped 128 and was 4100 lbs. Not dyno racing, these are real numbers.
#39
Why do you think the Mustang should trap 130+ in the 1/4? A friend of mine has a 2012 5.0 with full bolt-ons, Boss intake and a Procharger. Suspension, stall converter and gears. I ran him on motor and beat him by 2-3 cars and I trap 127-130mph on motor depending on the weather. Full weight F-body.
Odarabla VS Supercharged 2011-2012 5.0 - YouTube
On this pass he ran 128mph and I went 129mph. And no he didn't pull anything back from the launch.
Now I do know another guy with a 2011 5.0. Built bottom end motor all the other goodies and a turbo and he has been 9.70's@136mph so far Full weight. He's trying to get the bugs worked out of it.
Odarabla VS Supercharged 2011-2012 5.0 - YouTube
On this pass he ran 128mph and I went 129mph. And no he didn't pull anything back from the launch.
Now I do know another guy with a 2011 5.0. Built bottom end motor all the other goodies and a turbo and he has been 9.70's@136mph so far Full weight. He's trying to get the bugs worked out of it.