350z vs bolt on LS1/LT1 Trans Am's and more
#46
Teching In
Gotta agree with Marc97 on this one...sounds like ***..but on the other hand, the car looks pretty good.
Guess everyone has their own taste and preferences though.
Guess everyone has their own taste and preferences though.
#50
OP is nothing more than a troll. The 350 is probably on spray, just like the "bolt on V6" 2012 mustang that he posted beating a Cobra.
This queer and his bullshit was called out on CSS.net about all the accord BS to the point where mods told him to cut the **** or they'd ban him. He already got banned from SVTP...
Stop replying to his threads and block him. He will go away.
This queer and his bullshit was called out on CSS.net about all the accord BS to the point where mods told him to cut the **** or they'd ban him. He already got banned from SVTP...
Stop replying to his threads and block him. He will go away.
#51
Yes lifter tick ftl.
Made a video too, to show that I still have the stock stall.
Have video of me running the times, timeslips, pics, much more.
Last edited by 4PointSlow; 04-07-2014 at 04:11 AM.
#52
4PointSlow, how do all these cars you post (including your own) have such high trap speeds? Not saying this in a derogatory way but I would like to know the secret. I cannot achieve this and it is making me feel like dog poo.
For eg, that 310Hp 370Z is trapping 113mph. Damn impressive! Do you know if weight has been removed? If I recall, those Z's are not exactly light.
In addition, the torque on those cars are also much lower than an LS or LT motor. My point being, if the torque is low, Hp not high (enough) and the weight is somewhat heavy, what causes these cars to accelerate so quick in a short distance. Last time I checked the rate of acceleration still equals force/mass.
For eg, that 310Hp 370Z is trapping 113mph. Damn impressive! Do you know if weight has been removed? If I recall, those Z's are not exactly light.
In addition, the torque on those cars are also much lower than an LS or LT motor. My point being, if the torque is low, Hp not high (enough) and the weight is somewhat heavy, what causes these cars to accelerate so quick in a short distance. Last time I checked the rate of acceleration still equals force/mass.
A 310 whp Z trapping 113 doesn't seem unreasonable to me? I trapped 113 making 325 whp in 700 da, and I weigh more. In negative DA, it seems about right?
#53
#54
Teching In
I guess, man. Maybe I am just bummed that my car cannot do that. I must say that you and your friends have some decently quick cars for the minimal mods you have. Wish I knew your secrets.
#58
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#59
What more proof do you need? Want me to re-post vids of my runs at the track? Re-post the timeslips and pics of my car ? Want me to write your name on the timeslips?
Either.
A. You're ignorant and there is no help.
B. You are confused.
...most likely both.
I also am requesting as to where my quote is in your sig. The thread and post number.
Last edited by 4PointSlow; 04-08-2014 at 03:37 AM.
#60
Made one pass at 10 am, the 12.4 @ 113. Let it set for 2 hours then made a pass(112 trap), DA had risen quite a bit. So I let it cool down for another 2 hours, then made 2 passes(the races against the mustang; trapped 111 and at this point the DA was well over 1k). As you can see the DA got progressively worse(track open 10-6). At sea level or below I would have trapped 114+.
FTR this is my setup on drag radials, I went on street tires(as shown in the vid) because I didn't want to have to worry about hurting the rear end.
Last edited by 4PointSlow; 04-08-2014 at 03:32 AM.