Bolt-on A6 Coyote vs Stock A6 C7
05-07-2014, 11:07 AM
#101
Teching In
If you think that hp per liter is not an important measurement of how efficient and well engineered an engine is your a retard. We all know Cheby is all about "BIGGER!!!!!!!" and we know most hp and average hp is important for winning a drag race but if we are talking about technology, design, and efficiency your plain retarded.
05-07-2014, 11:09 AM
#102
10 Second Club
Its that old school ricer comment about how "it will smoke you in twisties bruh"
If you think that hp per liter is not an important measurement of how efficient and well engineered an engine is your a retard. We all know Cheby is all about "BIGGER!!!!!!!" and we know most hp and average hp is important for winning a drag race but if we are talking about technology, design, and efficiency your plain retarded.
If you think that hp per liter is not an important measurement of how efficient and well engineered an engine is your a retard. We all know Cheby is all about "BIGGER!!!!!!!" and we know most hp and average hp is important for winning a drag race but if we are talking about technology, design, and efficiency your plain retarded.
05-07-2014, 11:19 AM
#103
It isn't useless. It's the best way to measure the engineered efficiency of a motor. Fact. Can it be circumvented by a competitor using a larger, less efficient design? Sure can. But that still doesn't change the fact that the coyote is a more efficient design than the LS3... /thread.
05-07-2014, 11:22 AM
#104
10 Second Club
It isn't useless. It's the best way to measure the engineered efficiency of a motor. Fact. Can it be circumvented by a competitor using a larger, less efficient design? Sure can. But that still doesn't change the fact that the coyote is a more efficient design than the LS3... /thread.
LS engine have a better hp\pound efficiency, which is a more useful measurement of efficiency!
05-07-2014, 11:57 AM
#105
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes
on
31 Posts
Okay, I'll bite. What's with the poster's initials before their vehicle in their sigs? TLS, EJR, etc. Is that like a hashtag but for the car?
Please elaborate.
Please elaborate.
05-07-2014, 12:28 PM
#110
Banned
iTrader: (1)
!["MAC"'s Avatar](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 50 50'><circle class='avatar-circle-default' fill='%237f3b59' cx='25px' cy='25px' r='20px'></circle><text class='avatar-text-default' x='49%' y='53%' fill='white' text-anchor='middle' alignment-baseline='middle'>"</text></svg>)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I find it hilarious that ford took nearly 20yrs to produce a ohc engine 4v with more than 400hp when gm did it in the 90s in the Zr1 with the LT5 they had two power options 350hp and 400hp hmmm
05-07-2014, 12:46 PM
#115
No, but yet again, appropriate spelling and grammatical efficiency helps others understand your typically ill-informed and frankly pathetic posts. I didn't think that pointing out a fact was being a douche, but last I heard, your car was in the mid-twelve second range...thus, well withing even "cam only" 2v territory. Just sayin'.
05-07-2014, 12:52 PM
#116
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes
on
31 Posts
This is one of those times when people dismiss your posts because you've passed full retard.
You're also uneducated on the LT5. Lotus, skip. Lotus. GM didn't engineer that engine.
05-07-2014, 12:57 PM
#118
10 Second Club
05-07-2014, 12:59 PM
#119
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lotus engineered, Mercury Marine built. And wtf are you talking about 350 and 400hp options?
