98CayenneT/A

Ha agreed, I've been reading this funny **** but that's just weird

2003Cobro

Yeah my house is nuts 24/7. Wife is a hottie. I married up. I'll keep her pics to myself tho.

98CayenneT/A

That's a hand full, my buddy has the same thing but another on top of that, two sets of twins and his first born, all within 7 years

SharkBait Hoo Ha Ha

You make me giggle. Not a Ford ego? You're on a GM based forum with a screen name that was purposely intended to annoy people. And now you're just grasping at straws, looking for a reason to ridicule me via the cars that I own. Because I've obviously gotten under your skin and you have nothing else to spew. I do own an LS1. That's why I joined this forum, Ford boy. Why don't you go over to mustangforums and circle jerk all of your fellow blue oval nut huggers? I'm glad that my avatar bothered you too lol...

And LS1 > Mach 1. Still. Get over it, cry baby.

95Prplppletrz28

iTrader: (1)

I said my piece in here earlier that i respect Mach's and they are a decent race for a ls1(edge to ls1). But some people refuse to believe that... However here's a little proof the ls1 is superior....How many non f body/y body cars out there these days are getting ls1 swaps? Rx7s,240s,old Porsches, even seen foxes, s10s, and countless more.... Wonder why? Now how many mach one engines are out there getting swapped around? Answer: not enough to mention.

SoFla01SSLookinstok

Gorgeous children! Congrats man!

SoFla01SSLookinstok

So what were the mods to get 340/360? You say a bolt on LS1 with stock exhaust manifolds? Dyno sheet? My base line was 319/328 with only lid & bellow. I know these are all just dyno #'s but that seems a bit too high for a stock LS1 long block. It seems closer to a stock LS6.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Car was very basic. Had a ported ls6 intake, exhaust mani's were ported a little, udp, ory.....I forget what type of catback and stock tune. He probably has the dyno sheet.

stock ls6's should be near 360whp~ and bolt on one's should go over 400whp. There is 60 hp difference in the two engines.

odthetruth

iTrader: (4)

Stock LS6s from what I've seen have been 330-340. Bolt ons being ~370-390, and cammed ones being 400-440 based on spec and supporting mods.

S8ER95Z

iTrader: (3)

That doesn't prove the LS1 is superior when it comes to the Mach 1 vs Fbody. The new 5.0 is superior to the LS1 but it's not going to be swapped into nearly as many cars due to cost/packaging/availability.

S8ER95Z

iTrader: (3)

Oh man you better avoid the challenge like the plague then...no room for that **** in there.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Not that I have been around many......but a quick search can find plenty at 350+. Easy to find bolt-on ls6's over 400 too. Mine for instance is well over 400, 430~ on a dynojet. Cam only ls6's should be 450+ if the guys is serious about making power and don't just want to talk about his cam install.

S8ER95Z

iTrader: (3)

It depends on what the LS6 is in I think...I see far more 345-355 C5Zs than I do the CTSv cars. Probably a higher drivetrain loss or different tune in the CTSv cars?

big hammer

Yeah that's why I never bothered.

S8ER95Z

iTrader: (3)

Damn it... that means you are smarter than I am. ****.

big hammer

I knew that even if I ever did make it this year, it wouldn't be till end of july or august.

SoFla01SSLookinstok

From my experience odthetruth's calculations seem to be spot on. Those #'s, 340/360, seem a bit high especially w/o longtubes. Getting the long tubes installed was the biggest power adder bolt on, about 30/30 gain at the rear wheels. If those #'s were made on a "good" dyno with the mods you stated I would almost guarantee thats a record. You have stated you put down 417/395, very good for a bolt on LS6. The cam only 450+ I can't believe. LS1/6 cars i've seen running 450+ rwhp are mostly H/C/I builds. Here's one...

S8ER95Z

iTrader: (3)

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c5-z...ly-c5-z06.html

Edit: I found these inside 2 minutes... I am sure you can find other examples (north of 450rwhp) with some effort.

1 Slow WS6

iTrader: (1)

I hit 12.9 with just a cat back in my 01

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

I can see that.....the cts-v's have those 80lb clutches and super heavy wheel tire combo soaking some up.
By the quick glimpse of the graph it was still goin up at a pretty good rate.......most are skeered to turn these engines for some reason. A ls6 should be good to 7400-7600 with the appropriate cam/springs/intake.

W/o being on the same dyno it's hard to say. Most want to go by dynojet numbers. My dynojet numbers would be 431hp/405tq. My 417hp/395 numbers were made on a dyno dynamics, they are known to be conservative. Before the 1.8 rockers it made 413 on the same dyno.....which is exactly what vetteboy's record ls6 car made. He also dyno's on a dyno dynamics but not the one I am on. They are both full bolt-ons. Like I said if you are serious about making some hp out of them they will do it. Most would rather talk about their cam though.

Briansformula has also been over 400 with his bolt-on ls6.
Good find.....neither of those cars had a fast on it either. +15rwhp for a ported fast on them easily.