2016 Drag race!
09-27-2016, 10:00 AM
#101
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Pretty simple to figure out if you have a run .4 faster than any of the others it may be fake.....especially with a auto. Now if you have a stick car with runs between 10.7 and 11.3 iin some sort of succession it likely shows different launch techniques. ...some blown runs. Don't really take a college to figure that out.
Not at all. You can't just make accusations with out showing some sort of proof or reasoning. Both of which the cobrohomo crew lacks here.
09-27-2016, 10:12 AM
#102
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Then how come you're struggling with this so much. Are a sevant disorder?
Pretty simple to figure out if you have a run .4 faster than any of the others it may be fake.....especially with a auto. Now if you have a stick car with runs between 10.7 and 11.3 iin some sort of succession it likely shows different launch techniques. ...some blown runs. Don't really take a college to figure that out.
Pretty simple to figure out if you have a run .4 faster than any of the others it may be fake.....especially with a auto. Now if you have a stick car with runs between 10.7 and 11.3 iin some sort of succession it likely shows different launch techniques. ...some blown runs. Don't really take a college to figure that out.
09-27-2016, 11:38 AM
#105
But that's not what it took for you to run about even with one...so why do you always say that?
you had an e85 tune, drag pack, lowering springs (will help at speed period) and cat back. and were running against a manual.
the average s5550 with 93 tune, cat back and stock wheels/tires everything else would get beaten. handily. especially tranny to tranny.
ive also found out that dedicated e85 tunes do not produce more power. been talking to tuners. another lie that keeps being repeated on here.
Ive been asking a lot of tuners about this because im going e85 with my car. if done properly the flex tune will compensate correctly for the given ethanol content and produce the same hp. any difference between gains is due to differing e85 content between cars etc. the sensor knows how much content is in the fuel and adjusts timing appropriately. its no different than tuning for the content.
they also got the e85 figured out. got the sensor working. uh oh...
how does 440+rwhp and 450+rwtq through an auto with just e85, cat delete (only 1 set) and CAI sound? Sounds like on par with an FBO s550...uh oh...
sounds like I can do a drag pack and a converter with e85 and the bros be needing internal or a lung...lol (or rip everything out and run ftw)
you had an e85 tune, drag pack, lowering springs (will help at speed period) and cat back. and were running against a manual.
the average s5550 with 93 tune, cat back and stock wheels/tires everything else would get beaten. handily. especially tranny to tranny.
ive also found out that dedicated e85 tunes do not produce more power. been talking to tuners. another lie that keeps being repeated on here.
Ive been asking a lot of tuners about this because im going e85 with my car. if done properly the flex tune will compensate correctly for the given ethanol content and produce the same hp. any difference between gains is due to differing e85 content between cars etc. the sensor knows how much content is in the fuel and adjusts timing appropriately. its no different than tuning for the content.
they also got the e85 figured out. got the sensor working. uh oh...
how does 440+rwhp and 450+rwtq through an auto with just e85, cat delete (only 1 set) and CAI sound? Sounds like on par with an FBO s550...uh oh...
sounds like I can do a drag pack and a converter with e85 and the bros be needing internal or a lung...lol (or rip everything out and run ftw)
Quit talking aboot it. Woulda shoulda coulda
09-27-2016, 11:39 AM
#106
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Given his 60 was a 1.8X on his 12.4 run he said he dead hooked and his 60 was a 2.1X on his 12.7-12.8 runs he said he was spinning, common sense and analytical ability seems to tell us what was happening.
09-27-2016, 11:41 AM
#107
Hio wouldnt listen to the actual owner of the car. He is busy spending lots of time screenshotting certain parts of races to fit his narrative. Poor Hio. Them boys are S550 butthurt.
09-27-2016, 11:44 AM
#108
I know what you're saying and that's not where I was going with anything.
Im not in total agreement with hio on the results. It was close I'll leave it at that. So close my argument here was with his vague statements on what an s550 needs to run with a 6g. And a simple tune and cat back won't cut it. The results of that race don't bother me. It's about what I expected.
Just trolling back his troll on this tired subject.
And I do think you have a little bit of a br0gina starting but maybe I'm wrong
Im not in total agreement with hio on the results. It was close I'll leave it at that. So close my argument here was with his vague statements on what an s550 needs to run with a 6g. And a simple tune and cat back won't cut it. The results of that race don't bother me. It's about what I expected.
Just trolling back his troll on this tired subject.
And I do think you have a little bit of a br0gina starting
but maybe I'm wrong
09-27-2016, 12:04 PM
#109
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Dude the ****** screen shots don't lie. You lost 3 of 5. Get 9prple in here. I'm pretty sure he don't think he lost them all. Why would he?
It's very clear you are in denial.
He didn't make it past a 12.8 that day. Nice try tho.
It's very clear you are in denial.
Believe it or not, automatic cars spin with street tires too and aren't consistent when trying different launch techniques on street tires.
Given his 60 was a 1.8X on his 12.4 run he said he dead hooked and his 60 was a 2.1X on his 12.7-12.8 runs he said he was spinning, common sense and analytical ability seems to tell us what was happening.
Given his 60 was a 1.8X on his 12.4 run he said he dead hooked and his 60 was a 2.1X on his 12.7-12.8 runs he said he was spinning, common sense and analytical ability seems to tell us what was happening.
09-27-2016, 12:20 PM
#112
I've been a member here for over ten years.
I've done mechanic work in the side for 17 years since I was 14.
I've owned 3 camaros.
I've built an ls1 for myself and one for my buddy. I do most all my own work when I have time except for tuning.
I've lost my license in the past from street racing.
But I can't speak on these subjects because I don't own a 6g?
Damn near every person in this forum does not own a 6g and has talked in what ifs. Me thinks some people it just hits too hard in the truth meter some of my comments they do.
I've done mechanic work in the side for 17 years since I was 14.
I've owned 3 camaros.
I've built an ls1 for myself and one for my buddy. I do most all my own work when I have time except for tuning.
I've lost my license in the past from street racing.
But I can't speak on these subjects because I don't own a 6g?
Damn near every person in this forum does not own a 6g and has talked in what ifs. Me thinks some people it just hits too hard in the truth meter some of my comments they do.
09-27-2016, 12:34 PM
#113
2 of those races were aborted runs. Yet you so carefully count them as full races. Camera angle on last race deceivung. I was a nose ahead and started to pull at the end. Same kind of pull I did on the 2nd race 20 roll.
09-27-2016, 12:42 PM
#114
Still waiting on you to disprove it. No spin run vs tiresoin runs same day. Came back 2 weeks later and ran multiple 12.6s in 1000ft higher da with ZERO addituonal mods. You are just butthurt
09-27-2016, 12:57 PM
#116
09-27-2016, 03:55 PM
#117
7 Second Club
You pulled covers off and installed parts....not a bolt on car even by LS1tech LS1/6 bolton list standard.
09-27-2016, 06:55 PM
#119
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Funny how now you want to throw out short races but yet thought they were good enough to make a vid with. You lost 3 of 5 plain and simple.
You know if you want to throw out the short races I'm ok eith ut. Just say so......then you'll end up 1-1-1 with phil.
So say it's ok to throw out the short races.
I laugh at the nanner.
You averaged 1.74 or some **** that day with the timing error and the worst one thrown out, I think that is pretty accurate for your car.
You pulled covers off and installed parts....not a bolt on car even by LS1tech LS1/6 bolton list standard.
It's really kinda pathetic how far the goal posts move from comment to comment.
You pulled covers off and installed parts....not a bolt on car even by LS1tech LS1/6 bolton list standard.
It's really kinda pathetic how far the goal posts move from comment to comment.
Ls6 is bolt on. Proved that from the ford sites. Are you saying the old foxes weren't bolt on with rockers?
09-27-2016, 07:05 PM
#120
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: heading South East on Bakalakadaka street
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
If you're going to argue tire spin, the same could be said for the 6G and then its one big pissing fest. The GT350R being under 5mph and within .2 tenths ET is not exactly a slaughter when it costs 15k+ more in msrp. Especially since its the 350R and not just the GT350.
The 6G has proven stock for stock to be faster than the 5.0 of the same year in many different tests, mags, and actual races. Its cool that modded vs modded, it goes either way. Driver, mods, race type, etc all play roles.