Originally Posted by big hammer

Well ls9/Lsa heads are basically ls3 heads so

Originally Posted by automach1

So do you have proof or just more quotes from ppl crying about the numbers like yourself?

Originally Posted by 408-99-f

They came in trucks too, you said that they were good N/A motors, they can be swapped. Or a truck can be built too. Lots of LS trucks out there N/A running decent for the weight. There has been a couple unicorns but that's it. Just because a hand full of people did crazy full builds, with good results doesn't make it a good all around N/A motor. If they responded to anything but a full build people would have done it. What do you think a fbo 5.4 f150 makes for power?

Originally Posted by 408-99-f

They came in trucks too, you said that they were good N/A motors, they can be swapped. Or a truck can be built too. Lots of LS trucks out there N/A running decent for the weight. There has been a couple unicorns but that's it. Just because a hand full of people did crazy full builds, with good results doesn't make it a good all around N/A motor. If they responded to anything but a full build people would have done it. What do you think a fbo 5.4 f150 makes for power?

Originally Posted by TT427

dyno was in the link troll. If you read the link you would see it was not arguments it was discussing the actual hp by nontroll members, and the Coletti RINGER was referenced and everyone agreed that's not what they actually dyno stock. Grow a pair and admit your wrong...

Originally Posted by automach1

So the ls3 is not a ls9 no basically about it. So again how many n/a ls9/lsa cars have you seen?

Originally Posted by big hammer

An ls9 is an ls3 but stronger. Ported stock ls3 castings have been 800 hp NA on stock CI.

There's hardly any good 5.4 parts out there

Originally Posted by big hammer

An ls9 is an ls3 but stronger. Ported stock ls3 castings have been 800 hp NA on stock CI.

There's hardly any good 5.4 parts out there

Originally Posted by automach1

So scientific. My car runs 8s must be true because I said so on a forum

Originally Posted by TT427

The dyno posted isn't scientific?

Originally Posted by automach1

So how many people have converter their ls9 into a n/a build? It's a simple question hammerhead.

Yet you are stuck around 650 with a 388.

Originally Posted by TT427

So exclusivity = superior? Lol

Originally Posted by automach1

Holy **** are you serious right now? Tell me what trucks got the 5.4 with GT heads? I will be at the junkyard tomorrow to retrieve them. I will wait numb nuts. Then after that you can tell me what trucks got a 5.4 DOHC period. LMAO

My truck does have a 5.4 though

Originally Posted by automach1

Some dyno lower than others. Not that hard to understand dyno to dyno even using a DJ will put out different numbers.

Originally Posted by big hammer

Sweet. Hit me up when you want to learn about my 3% drive train loss!

Originally Posted by TT427

Whatever fuqtard... you keep living in your world of lies. It will bite you in the *** one day, guaranteed. Now why don't you explain all the differences between the ls9 and ls3 head k?

Originally Posted by automach1

Sweet hit me up when you put it on a DJ and make ~575sae.

Originally Posted by automach1

I will once you find me a ls9 that was converted into a n/a build.

Originally Posted by 408-99-f

Are you serious? You said 5.4 now it's the x headed 5.4. Nice stip though. Keep beating that N/A 5.4 drum all you want. Only making power fully built after throwing a obscene amount of money at it does not make a good n/a motor.
And why don't you throw some direct injection on your car lol

Originally Posted by 408-99-f

Are you serious? You said 5.4 now it's the x headed 5.4. Nice stip though. Keep beating that N/A 5.4 drum all you want. Only making power fully built after throwing a obscene amount of money at it does not make a good n/a motor.
And why don't you throw some direct injection on your car lol