When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
How bout engaging nate to answer the questions i asked.
We know you because you're a bitch.
Originally Posted by Nick.H
trying to get a straight answer out of Doug is pointless
Hhhhmmmmmm
I don't know how make a answer any straighter.
Originally Posted by NateLS1Mustang
Doug knows exactly how retarded he sounds but he's one of those little bitches who can't admit he's wrong so he'd rather have 10 dudes **** him in his *** for the remainder of the argument until it blows over.
The only ones getting fucked in the *** here is you morons. But you seem to enjoy taking it in the *** or you woulda stfu already.
Originally Posted by NateLS1Mustang
So basically what Hio is saying is that when you destroke a motor you are in fact not destroking the motor, you're destroking the heads?
Not what i said at all.
How's those ls7 heads fitting that 4.8 for ya
I've never in my life seen a group of dumbasses be so wrong as you morons but continue to think you're right. You're all hillarys
Who said LS7 heads would fit on a 4.8? No one. But you did state multiple times that putting LS7 heads on a 4.8 would make it a LS7.
"Heads determine the engine." - Hio
Also Hio: "Only when those heads are LS3 style on a destroked LS7 block."
You're the one that said you're gonna make your 4.8 a ls7 .
Stick to your word man. No matter how dumb you sound.
Originally Posted by SoFla01SSLookinstok
Hiho, read a little more. That pic you keep posting says "LS port identification" not "LS engine identification".
Since you think that is the end all pic. Why do all the ports say LSX?
Well the pic designates the head. The lsx means different combos could be under that head. Take your slow pos 383 for instance. Not a oe ci so ut falls under lsx.
God you're dumb.
How the **** do you not forget to breathe being that dumb?
Originally Posted by Nick.H
So then what do you call an LS7 with LS3 heads? Or what do you you call an LS3 with LS7 heads?
There are big ci ls3 headed engines out there that are not ls7s.
You can try putting ls7 heads on a ls3 if you like. They'll fit. It's probably gonna want to rev alot.
Any combination of would be a lsx with a 3, 7 or 6/1 headed motor.
After all a ls7 is a 427 ci ti rodded ls7 headed engine.
Well the pic designates the head. The lsx means different combos could be under that head. Take your slow pos 383 for instance. Not a oe ci so ut falls under lsx.
This got to be one of the best points in here. When the engine becomes a "hybrid" so to speak, like in hammer's case. The easiest way to designate what it is would simply be a 388ci lsx. The "LS7" stamped on the block itself no longer describes what the engine really is. At that point, when you're mix-matching parts, who gives a **** what's stamped on the block. Good post hio.
I'm sure a lot of y'all remember, at least if you read on the tech side of this forum and not SRK only, that there was a 331ci build using a 6.0 block with a 4.8 crankshaft. The builder called it a destroked LQ motor and everyone else & their mothers called it a destroked LQ motor. It ended up making great power. I believe in the 600s.
But anyways, however, when it's the Hiocrew that destrokes an LS7, it's just a big bore LS3 because of the style of the cylinder heads. Not a destroked LS7.. Strange eh?
And the only reason why Hio keeps up with this argument is because the 5.br0 has him grabbed by the ***** and he can't get his focus off LS3 vs 5.0. He desperately wants to believe Hambone's build is just your typical run of the mill LS3 so he can always bring it up when comparing to a Ford 5.0 build.
Smh, he's lost his ******* mind over a dumbass brand "battle."
This got to be one of the best points in here. When the engine becomes a "hybrid" so to speak, like in hammer's case. The easiest way to designate what it is would simply be a 388ci lsx. The "LS7" stamped on the block itself no longer describes what the engine really is. At that point, when you're mix-matching parts, who gives a **** what's stamped on the block. Good post hio.
Thanks
Originally Posted by R6cowboy
I side/agree with what's reasonable, that is all.
I'm always very reasonable.
As you can see its the cobro crew that's not.
Originally Posted by snake95
No his post was hot garbage as usual.
Please grace us with another of your very informative posts
Originally Posted by SoFla01SSLookinstok
Hihos post is garbage. All that pic is for is LS port ID. That's it.
Making his own thoughts rules as usual. How the **** do you know that doesn't mean that all those heads will work on a LSX block?
Then you say my motor falls under lsx. Ok. So hamms is an lsx also. Not an ls3.
This is boring.
They would work on a lsx block. But you're probably the only one dumb enough to put a cathedral head on a lsx block these days.
Yours is a lsx....so is hammers. You have cathedral heads.....he has ls3 heads. See......simple.
Originally Posted by NateLS1Mustang
I'm sure a lot of y'all remember, at least if you read on the tech side of this forum and not SRK only, that there was a 331ci build using a 6.0 block with a 4.8 crankshaft. The builder called it a destroked LQ motor and everyone else & their mothers called it a destroked LQ motor. It ended up making great power. I believe in the 600s.
But anyways, however, when it's the Hiocrew that destrokes an LS7, it's just a big bore LS3 because of the style of the cylinder heads. Not a destroked LS7.. Strange eh?
And the only reason why Hio keeps up with this argument is because the 5.br0 has him grabbed by the ***** and he can't get his focus off LS3 vs 5.0. He desperately wants to believe Hambone's build is just your typical run of the mill LS3 so he can always bring it up when comparing to a Ford 5.0 build.
Smh, he's lost his ******* mind over a dumbass brand "battle."
I have had no grabbing from a 5br0.
Even a typical run of the mill ls3 build will out power a 5br0 easily. Remember the ls3 vs 5br0 challenge? It don't get any more run of the mill than that.
In order for hammers 388 lsx ls3 to be a destroked ls7 it would've had to use ls7 style head. The results likely woulda been more power and more rpm.
I'm not the one arguing over the brand battle. Fact is lsx completely ***** the 5br0 in the ***. The 5br0 only hope is to go boosted. It simply cannot compete na.
Now the 5br0 could very well compete and win against your builds nate. Because you suck.
In the end what we have in the ls...lsx engines is something the end user can very simply customize to their needs. It's a tradition from it roots of the sbc. Which is no doubt the most versatile and winning engine on the planet.
If you want a higher revving engine you can build something like hammers and even go for more. If you want a truck engine like soslo then you can build one like his. You can sorce and mix/match oe findings to your hearts desire.......all the way up to a 427ci ls7 or 454 lsx.
Classis dismissed
Last edited by HioSSilver; 09-25-2017 at 03:08 PM.
Cylinder heads are apart of the combo, yes. Does that designate how you name the motor, absolutely not.
Im not even sure what heads he used but what if they're cathedral port. Which I think they are. What are you calling this destroked LQ motor? A ******* LS1 or 6 because they're cathedral ports?
09-22-2017, 03:40 PM
trying to get a straight answer out of Doug is pointless
