Ford needs a supercharger to compeet
#141
Ok....here's the deal. Every bolt on car I've had a hand in has mopped every bolt on car you've done. So that means any that you outran with your turd bolt on furd **** was either
A- they had no clue
B- you stole the hit and let off early
C- you sprayed
D- they were completely stock to your fbo
So you cammed 3v ran beside a stock poorly driven vette.....bfd.
A- they had no clue
B- you stole the hit and let off early
C- you sprayed
D- they were completely stock to your fbo
So you cammed 3v ran beside a stock poorly driven vette.....bfd.
False my bolton GT500 went 9.88. Try again fk boy.
#143
#146
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
#147
#148
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
I don't really care much about boosted **** as i am not boosted. But the record shows I've drug your *** with every bolt on car you've done with every one I've done or helped on.
With a batting average like that there is no reason i wouldn't drag you if i went boosted to. But unlike you......I'm not stuck in the 12s with bolt ons.
I mean it's not even like you were close with bolt ons. Full on thrashing.
With a batting average like that there is no reason i wouldn't drag you if i went boosted to. But unlike you......I'm not stuck in the 12s with bolt ons.
I mean it's not even like you were close with bolt ons. Full on thrashing.
#150
I don't really care much about boosted **** as i am not boosted. But the record shows I've drug your *** with every bolt on car you've done with every one I've done or helped on.
With a batting average like that there is no reason i wouldn't drag you if i went boosted to. But unlike you......I'm not stuck in the 12s with bolt ons.
I mean it's not even like you were close with bolt ons. Full on thrashing.
With a batting average like that there is no reason i wouldn't drag you if i went boosted to. But unlike you......I'm not stuck in the 12s with bolt ons.
I mean it's not even like you were close with bolt ons. Full on thrashing.
#152
7 Second Club
#154
GM uses a 2.3 and makes less power. Amazing.
#155
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
There is no proof at all thetimers were fucked up idiot. And with several outings in the 11.0-11.1 range al different tracks there is no disputing it unless you're just a butt hurt little bitch.
The gm 2.3 barely flows any more than the 1.9 do to the runner design. I've only said this lie 3p0 times now. Info is out there and readily available. But you keep crying the same ****. Because apples to apples the furd **** gets it **** pushed in.
Did you notice how my bolt on furd went faster than all your bolt on furds?
The gm 2.3 barely flows any more than the 1.9 do to the runner design. I've only said this lie 3p0 times now. Info is out there and readily available. But you keep crying the same ****. Because apples to apples the furd **** gets it **** pushed in.
Did you notice how my bolt on furd went faster than all your bolt on furds?
#156
There is no proof at all thetimers were fucked up idiot. And with several outings in the 11.0-11.1 range al different tracks there is no disputing it unless you're just a butt hurt little bitch.
The gm 2.3 barely flows any more than the 1.9 do to the runner design. I've only said this lie 3p0 times now. Info is out there and readily available. But you keep crying the same ****. Because apples to apples the furd **** gets it **** pushed in.
Did you notice how my bolt on furd went faster than all your bolt on furds?
The gm 2.3 barely flows any more than the 1.9 do to the runner design. I've only said this lie 3p0 times now. Info is out there and readily available. But you keep crying the same ****. Because apples to apples the furd **** gets it **** pushed in.
Did you notice how my bolt on furd went faster than all your bolt on furds?
Well 11.0 is 11s derp.
The GM 2.3 makes 100 less whp then a 2.3 modular 4v. Runner design or not it gets **** on.
Again 9.88 > 11.xx.
#157
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Why you upset about the 1.2?
The other 10 run was a 1.5
Like i said with several outings in the 11.0-11.1 range there is no surprise the car ran what it did with that kind of mph.
So you're either to stupid or to butt hurt to accept it.
The gm 2.3 is different. Run the motors at the same boost and the gm motors **** all over the furd motors. Just how it is. Just like all the bolt on stuff I've had a hand in ***** on your bolt on and then some ****.
Those are the facts. You are a bitch....that's a fact also.
The other 10 run was a 1.5
Like i said with several outings in the 11.0-11.1 range there is no surprise the car ran what it did with that kind of mph.
So you're either to stupid or to butt hurt to accept it.
The gm 2.3 is different. Run the motors at the same boost and the gm motors **** all over the furd motors. Just how it is. Just like all the bolt on stuff I've had a hand in ***** on your bolt on and then some ****.
Those are the facts. You are a bitch....that's a fact also.
#158
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
#159
Why you upset about the 1.2?
The other 10 run was a 1.5
Like i said with several outings in the 11.0-11.1 range there is no surprise the car ran what it did with that kind of mph.
So you're either to stupid or to butt hurt to accept it.
The gm 2.3 is different. Run the motors at the same boost and the gm motors **** all over the furd motors. Just how it is. Just like all the bolt on stuff I've had a hand in ***** on your bolt on and then some ****.
Those are the facts. You are a bitch....that's a fact also.
The other 10 run was a 1.5
Like i said with several outings in the 11.0-11.1 range there is no surprise the car ran what it did with that kind of mph.
So you're either to stupid or to butt hurt to accept it.
The gm 2.3 is different. Run the motors at the same boost and the gm motors **** all over the furd motors. Just how it is. Just like all the bolt on stuff I've had a hand in ***** on your bolt on and then some ****.
Those are the facts. You are a bitch....that's a fact also.