125 shot 2v vs. h/c ls1
#3
7 Second Club
******* 2v couldn’t even get tire smoke, but yet enough to win. Wow
#5
TECH Junkie
#7
7 Second Club
Trending Topics
#8
#9
#11
7 Second Club
Saftey wall? Lol
But ya the vid was that shitty.
Why was the race that close...?
No wonder you can’t beat a 2v Jake. Lol
But ya the vid was that shitty.
Why was the race that close...?
No wonder you can’t beat a 2v Jake. Lol
#13
7 Second Club
Your response is more than weird. I’m sorry for you.
#16
Reading through the comments, this was at a track in Tucson Arizona and the DA was around +6,000. Camaro was an M6, had a custom grind cam, lightly worked LS6 243 heads, stock LS6 intake mani and LTs. Stock TB. Made 412rwhp on a hot *** day. Was on regular nitto street tires. Trapped almost 115 mph in 6,000 DA.
The 2v was FBO and either 125 or 150 shot. On drag pack and slicks. And ran a 12.5x at unknown mph.
So these cars would both easily be mid 11 second cars in the low 120's mph in good air.
The 2v was FBO and either 125 or 150 shot. On drag pack and slicks. And ran a 12.5x at unknown mph.
So these cars would both easily be mid 11 second cars in the low 120's mph in good air.
#17
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Neligh, NE
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WHAT DO YOU KNOW what a win light is at the track Mr. Trackless for the past decade or so? I simply showed a 2v 125 shot just about on par with your ‘beastly’ ls1 h/c even on drag radials. Quit doing ricer math by saying both cars ‘should’ be in the 11’s. Dont compare your mods it dont work that way. But hey with your excuse book of racing you’d probably hit a 14.0 with your tires and driving skills LOL.. 2v > your ls1
#18
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Neligh, NE
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
guess you only had selected reading in the comments. The owner of the 2v is on there. That was his old set up complete stock motor with the 125 shot. About 350whp. No wonder youve been butthurt for so many years after getting whooped by one lol. You then decided one day to grab your keyboard and hide behind the screen and bash on every mustang ever built. Go to the track already you vagina. Or are you too cheap to buy slicks? A track is a heart breaker. Youd see a 13.3 lol
#19
Lmao FlabbyStang butthurt that he owned himself by posting a 2v losing. Didn't even know what a win light was. Get owned, slowpoke.
So a 350whp 2v is a mid 11 second car? Lmao. I guess the 400whp 2v that o raced and BEAT twice, was an easy low 11 second car. My car was an easy 10 second car back then. Now its FASTER. i owned you again cunny boy.
Do you know what a win light is yet?
So a 350whp 2v is a mid 11 second car? Lmao. I guess the 400whp 2v that o raced and BEAT twice, was an easy low 11 second car. My car was an easy 10 second car back then. Now its FASTER. i owned you again cunny boy.
Do you know what a win light is yet?
#20
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
My old 2004 Mustang GT had full bolt ons, cams and a 100 shot. Made 400 rwhp and 500 rwtq. Even against my basic HCI setup on my Camaro it was not super close. The Camaro traps a good 4 mph better in the 1/4. That 2 valve I had was good for what it was, but even with all those mods it was a bit behind. If it had a 150 shot I really think it would've been a very tight race