Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

6th gen workin in mexico

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2019, 05:15 PM
  #121  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 413 Likes on 331 Posts

Default

It's dirt simple to run 10s with those cars......you proved that. If a larry can do it anyone can. You couldn't do it wif your 5br0 and you couldn't do it with a h/c c6 ls3. So yea you bought a car that could even if you weren't capable of building one that could.
Old 04-08-2019, 05:15 PM
  #122  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

What's the math say about needed power to move 3100lbs 60ft in 1.2 secs? Hmm ��

Last edited by TT427; 04-08-2019 at 05:35 PM.
Old 04-08-2019, 05:31 PM
  #123  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TT427
What's the math say about needed power to move 3100lbs 60ft in 1.2 secs? Hmm 🤔
Right around 800?
Old 04-08-2019, 05:34 PM
  #124  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by islander033
Right around 800?
lol, no your not stealing my questionmark...
Old 04-08-2019, 05:35 PM
  #125  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TT427
lol, no your not stealing my questionmark...
Too late holmes? lol
Old 04-08-2019, 05:44 PM
  #126  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 413 Likes on 331 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TT427
What's the math say about needed power to move 3100lbs 60ft in 1.2 secs? Hmm ��
Not alot. Sub 300whp cars can 60' bottom 1.5s at a heavier weight. All the math has showed it is technically possible at my weight and power.......no matter how improbable.
Old 04-08-2019, 05:46 PM
  #127  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Old 04-08-2019, 05:48 PM
  #128  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Not alot. Sub 300whp cars can 60' bottom 1.5s at a heavier weight. All the math has showed it is technically possible at my weight and power.......no matter how improbable.
Ya I was thinking somewhere around 300 possibly just under.

Of course pure math wont account for real world losses but its usually pretty close
Old 04-08-2019, 05:58 PM
  #129  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 413 Likes on 331 Posts

Default

Yea i don't think there is any real rules to what can or can't be done. I was told it was impossible for a bolt on ls6 to trap 130ish.......that didn't pan out for them. Ive seen 13sec cars pull the front wheels they left so hard....i woulda thought that was impossible.

My buddy phil pulled the front wheels with like a 1.76 60' with a stick and a 10bolt. I told him that was impossible until he freeze framed the vid lol. I stopped saying what was impossible after that.It was impossible for a bolt on ls3 vette to trap over 130(132 in our case) till we did it. And that wasn't even that hard.

**** it....we don't really know what's impossible.
Old 04-08-2019, 06:09 PM
  #130  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 413 Likes on 331 Posts

Default

Also there is really no way to do the math. Way to many factors and way to many techniques to figure out w/o a log of the run.
Old 04-08-2019, 06:28 PM
  #131  
Staging Lane
 
snake95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Yea i don't think there is any real rules to what can or can't be done. I was told it was impossible for a bolt on ls6 to trap 130ish.......that didn't pan out for them. Ive seen 13sec cars pull the front wheels they left so hard....i woulda thought that was impossible.

My buddy phil pulled the front wheels with like a 1.76 60' with a stick and a 10bolt. I told him that was impossible until he freeze framed the vid lol. I stopped saying what was impossible after that.It was impossible for a bolt on ls3 vette to trap over 130(132 in our case) till we did it. And that wasn't even that hard.

**** it....we don't really know what's impossible.
You sure like to give yourself credit and move the goalposts to 130mph traps when the discussion was on 60 foot times, those two couldn't be more different from being the identical discussion if they tried. Who said an LS3 couldn't trap 130? Sounds like some **** you're making up to sound like you shatter some self-imposed limits

People also said you'd have to have something wrong with your notch to not run 10s, so I guess it is hard to tell what's impossible
Old 04-08-2019, 06:40 PM
  #132  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
**** it....we don't really know what's impossible.
Nothing is impossible.. on the net. Lol.
Old 04-08-2019, 06:53 PM
  #133  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,598
Received 1,737 Likes on 1,298 Posts

Default


Old 04-08-2019, 07:03 PM
  #134  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 413 Likes on 331 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by snake95
You sure like to give yourself credit and move the goalposts to 130mph traps when the discussion was on 60 foot times, those two couldn't be more different from being the identical discussion if they tried. Who said an LS3 couldn't trap 130? Sounds like some **** you're making up to sound like you shatter some self-imposed limits

People also said you'd have to have something wrong with your notch to not run 10s, so I guess it is hard to tell what's impossible
Didn't move the goal posts at all. But you're to dense to pick up on that some said 130 traps was impossible with a bolt on ls6. I think we beat the nearest ls3 car by like 4 mph in trap. So yea until we did it it hadn't been done.....just how it is.

Why should the notch run 10s? I mean you idiots think because it's a pullied cobro engine in it that it should run 10s.....not so. Especially w/o a slick on it. As i have said and others has proved the combo on that car would struggle to hit 11s in a 03 cobro. Your furd buddy 2003cobro never went 11s and he was pullied hardee with 2 more psi of boost.

Originally Posted by SoFla01SSLookinstok
Nothing is impossible.. on the net. Lol.
My results are not the net. It's real lyfe. Just like you running 12.0~.
Old 04-08-2019, 07:36 PM
  #135  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Well my .2 sec better than 12.0 relation is better than your .05 better than 11.0. It really was an 11.0~ car. Timing error slips don't count.

You were trying a lot harder than me. How many slips again?
Old 04-08-2019, 07:59 PM
  #136  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 413 Likes on 331 Posts

Default

I had .24 better than 11.0. Nothing error about my slips.....deal with it bitch.

Yea i went to the track more than you and it shows.
Old 04-08-2019, 08:03 PM
  #137  
Staging Lane
 
snake95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SoFla01SSLookinstok
Well my .2 sec better than 12.0 relation is better than your .05 better than 11.0. It really was an 11.0~ car. Timing error slips don't count.

You were trying a lot harder than me. How many slips again?
Dude wake up. He hasn't ever tried at the track.

In order for it to be considered "trying" or "beating on it" you have to meet the following requirements:

1) full slick on 3psi
2) ice down intake
3) race gas
4) two step
5) powershift
6) "decide" that day, whether you were trying or not.

These built in excuses help those who choose to use them justify their results.
Old 04-08-2019, 08:19 PM
  #138  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I had .24 better than 11.0. Nothing error about my slips.....deal with it bitch.

Yea i went to the track more than you and it shows.
Your 1.2 60' was fraud. Hams should at least hit a 1.2 60' or better next time out. Or should have already.

Yes you ran your car more than me. Remember it's year round down here. Even with you being a nice bit older than me. Don't bet on it. Nothing is impossible.

Originally Posted by snake95
Dude wake up. He hasn't ever tried at the track.

In order for it to be considered "trying" or "beating on it" you have to meet the following requirements:

1) full slick on 3psi
2) ice down intake
3) race gas
4) two step
5) powershift
6) "decide" that day, whether you were trying or not.

These built in excuses help those who choose to use them justify their results.
Lol. Something was wrong with the tune.
Old 04-08-2019, 08:54 PM
  #139  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 413 Likes on 331 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by snake95
Dude wake up. He hasn't ever tried at the track.

In order for it to be considered "trying" or "beating on it" you have to meet the following requirements:

1) full slick on 3psi
2) ice down intake
3) race gas
4) two step
5) powershift
6) "decide" that day, whether you were trying or not.

These built in excuses help those who choose to use them justify their results.
Very true....i have never used any of that stuff. Does that make you mad or something? Didn't need any of that to drag your heep

Originally Posted by SoFla01SSLookinstok
Your 1.2 60' was fraud. Hams should at least hit a 1.2 60' or better next time out. Or should have already.

Yes you ran your car more than me. Remember it's year round down here. Even with you being a nice bit older than me. Don't bet on it. Nothing is impossible.



Lol. Something was wrong with the tune.
Why should hammer hit a 1.2 and not me?

So it's year round down there....damn. Zoolander would probably tell ya you don't race.
Old 04-08-2019, 08:57 PM
  #140  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Why would i do that? Why would someone use the same power adder on a engine that will make about 200whp more than yours if both were na?
200whp? Must be fun to just make up numbers lmao.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.