JC316

iTrader: (1)

Once again, we agree. As for which motor makes the most power, the 392 Hemi does. As for the Coyote vs LT1, my only advice is to go drive them both. The LT1 makes more power, there is no question or contest.

2010CamaroS

If you had an auto maybe you wouldn't be on your 4th engine

2010CamaroS

480 for coyote vs 455 for lt1 how does the lt1 make more power again?

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

I'm not so sure the 392 does. From the oe ratings it does but from actual chassis dyno numbers it don't seem to. Especially when bolt ons are included.

Besides....we weren't really talking about it.

Tell that to mac.

Not sure what this has to do with the m6.

Tq is the power. The lt makes more tq therefore it makes more power.

Red2kZ28

Lmao you don't know jack **** about anything, Mr. Weight has no bearing on fuel mileage.

JC316

iTrader: (1)

I can't say for sure on the bullitt since there are no dyno sheets and barely any track numbers. The LT1 is underrated, they're claiming 455, but the manual trans cars are putting down right around 405 to the tire. But yeah, like I said, go drive them and tell me which one is faster. I already know.

snake95

Okay Hio I'm with you here. We agree on something funny as hell

2010CamaroS

Considering the coyote has a better quart mile stock yea it's the coyote and who knew a dyno jet put out higher numbers just like manuals do with autos. There is a reason people talk track times over dyno results way too many variables with dynos

2010CamaroS

Hmm new mustang bullit making 435rwhp and 385ft lbs stock lol please tell us all more how the must make less power?

JC316

iTrader: (1)

Lets compare M6 to M6.

Bullitt went...

12.8@115 - Car and Driver
12.9@112 - Motor Trend
12.9@113 Motorweek

Camaro SS 1LE went...

12.3@115.9 - Road and Track
12.4 @115.8 - Motor Trend
12.4@116 - Car and Driver

Red2kZ28

This is a PRIME example of how utterly stupid you are. Saying how there's "too many variables with dynos", then in the very next post, 5 minutes later, you're dyno racing.

2010CamaroS

2019 mustang gt M6 making 430rwhp stock and 398rwtrq lol

Lt makes 405rwhp stock but some how that's more than the mustangs lol

Crazy how the tuner said he could use a higher degree of correction which changes the numbers for the better but they don't use those numbers... Thought dyno jet wasn't tamper proof?

2010CamaroS

Only using idiot logic so you people can understand. Clearly you retards like dyno numbers so that forced me to use them. Oh btw there are too many variables at the drag strip too yet people say that's the bees knees.

2010CamaroS

So what does the bullit make more power?

2010CamaroS

11.7 @118 mph for mustang gt vs 11.8 @ 117 mph for lt1 Camaro SS


Mustang gt makes more power like I said and so does the bullit.

NoEngineNawledge

JC316

iTrader: (1)

Peak HP, sure, but peaks are nothing but bragging rights. The added torque and how much the LT1 makes over the RPM range is why the SS is so much faster than the bullitt.

Red2kZ28

You literally couldn't tell that your transmission was starting in 2nd gear, and you're calling OTHER people retards? Keep the laughs coming, corky.

Chris25

iTrader: (1)

Is Mac day drinking today sheshhh........

2010CamaroS

Wrong lol then suspension on the bullit causes it to wheel hop a lot just like the 350s that's why they have shitty times. That's why the fat gen z28 did shitty in the quarter mile as well. They simply not built for the drag strip. The mustang gt runs better than the Camaro and bullit as well...