When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Seems as tho i understand it well enough to splain it to you while you continue to lie about it. Fact is i went faster than you did on your oe blower, faster than 2003cobrohomo did to on the oe blower and he was running more boost and more engine mawds.
That same 5gen 1le you mentioned drug the **** out of 2003cobrohomo......bolt on for bolt on. Ain't that some ****. In a heavier car and na.
Just how fast should the notch be? I think that's a fair question that deserves a reasonable conversation. I think a 11.2 would be spot on for it myself. Little better driving, making sure the ic pump is working, splash of race gas and maybe a little better tire and it would do that pretty slick i think.
But if you think that engine is a faster engine than the ls6 was you're just flat wrong.
Answered in order: No,no,no,no,no, should be faster than an NA bolt oin fif gen... like 10s without trying at your ~3000lbs weight, no.
PS. You must think I live/race at sea level, or you don't understand what SAE numbers mean. lol
PS. My POS WhiteWhale ® has ~20mph (non clean and pass first time out) on Hiollary best pass of her LIFE and she still thinks she's somehow relevant to any racing conversation.
LOLOLOL and HAHAHA....I'm sure if she was any more inbred she would get a handicap parking sticker.
Yeah 500 pounds of static weight should only knock off about half a second and 5 mph. Not sure why the MeTooCrew thinks it should be SO MUCH faster. Especially when one of them has nearly 4 digit whp and runs 10s.
And yeah, most basic bolt on cobros run 12s. I know 3 of them around here that ran mid-low 12s at 114-116 mph, and on DR's.
I just did a quick search and found one guy who has a Terminator fox and it ran 11.7 @ 120 with the basic cobro bolt ons.
Yea thats the way i look at it. Like i have said before i missed a shift on my best 1/8. Shoulda been a 11.4. I need more seat time in that car to get the most out of it. It also needs the battery moved to the back and a set of bias tires on it being a stick car. It's hard to get a stick car to move like it should on a dr......they never mention that tho.
The #metoocrew thinks it should be faster than it is. Nathan ran a 12.1 @119 in it the day he blew it up. Only difference is other than a decent rebuild is a 2lb lower and the ported blower. Which really made almost no difference in peak power but did help it carry up top a little better
Originally Posted by Red2kZ28
Poor Snakeypoo ignored my question earlier, how sad.
Hey SNAKE95, serious question here. You believe that a Terminator swapped fox should butt **** your car and it's track times, right??
It does butt **** his car. He has a solid high 12 car on the street.
Originally Posted by islander033
Answered in order: No,no,no,no,no, should be faster than an NA bolt oin fif gen... like 10s without trying at your ~3000lbs weight, no.
PS. You must think I live/race at sea level, or you don't understand what SAE numbers mean. lol
You make your own sea level. That's what boost applicators do. You're probably running around 20psi so that puts you at about -20,000 ft. What were you saying about sea level?
The 1le/vette/notch/ls6 were all on the same dyno. So i know exactly how they compare......so yes
No it's not gonna go 10s w/o trying. You simply have no clue. One would think you would after dealing with your own dyno queen. Now....could i put a better tire on it, killer chilker/ice box, e85/race gas, drive it better, move battery to the rear and make it run 10s? Probably.....but that's not how the camaro was ran. I thought a direct comparison was cool and what erryone would want to see. Well erryone but the furd guys because they think a termi swap automatically runs 10s in a fox.
Originally Posted by Red2kZ28
So a bolt on terminator motor in a fox should be as fast as a weight reduced GT500 that makes nearly 1,000whp? WOWZERZ!
Hey Doug, remember a couple years ago when Zoolander033 posted a vid of him beating a C6 ZR1 with the same blower as him and the "same rotor speed"? Then proceeded to make blanket statement after blanket statement about how LS sucks with FI.
I wonder how she'll explain this TVS powered GT100 getting walked by a C6 ZR1 with a SLOWER rotor speed.
It's highly obvious after the coyotah vs ls shoot out which is better boosted. Run at the same psi/efficiency the entire modular line stands no chance.
Now getting people to make the proper choices/mods to feed a ls with extra air is a much harder chore. But it goes back to what i said years ago......blowers hasn't caught up to the flow of the ls. The 2650 is really only a entry level supercharger for a ls.
Girl, you have nearly 1,000whp....Doug has 450whp...and you both run 10s. EL OH EL
Flake. Do you really think just running "tens", between two cars, makes them the same? Have you forgotten about things like weight & trap speed? Or a 10.9 is not the same as a 10.0? Or that DD has already trapped 140-150mph in the 1/4. Unless I'm mistaken this was all on old setup also. New setup may break single digits.
Flake. Do you really think just running "tens", between two cars, makes them the same? Have you forgotten about things like weight & trap speed? Or a 10.9 is the same as a 10.1? Or that DD has already trapped 140-150mph in the 1/4. Unless I'm mistaken this was all on old setup also. New setup may break single digits.
Thanks for bringing this up, NeedleDickRick. MeTooCrew has been saying for many years how Doug's trap speed doesn't match his ET. Are 150 mph cars supposed to run 10's??
You seem to think running 11s is the same. So i think you answered your own question.
Please explain what you seem to think I think. You, me, & most others here know what my cars best track time was. 11.80 in case you forgot. You confuse me with your statements. I don't come here with many questions.
Originally Posted by Red2kZ28
Thanks for bringing this up, NeedleDickRick. MeTooCrew has been saying for many years how Doug's trap speed doesn't match his ET. Are 150 mph cars supposed to run 10's??
For your question. How bout you get some knowledge for yourself & spend some time at a drag strip.
Flake. Do you really think just running "tens", between two cars, makes them the same? Have you forgotten about things like weight & trap speed? Or a 10.9 is the same as a 10.0? Or that DD has already trapped 140-150mph in the 1/4. Unless I'm mistaken this was all on old setup also. New setup may break single digits.
I'm not reading his posts anymore, but considering he's been running 9s and representing the ls community for years...I'm entirely sure his post was objective and insightful.
Also, LOL at him crying to Jay in PMs about people "harassing" him all while literally doing everything in his power to make people mad on the internet. If there ever was a stereotypical millennial...
The shit4brains crew is about to have a collective aneurism
Missy lost his soul to a turbo mustang.
Dug runs mid 11s with a termi notch.
Chris still doesn't own a keyboard with a period or comma key
That's a wrap. Don't have anymore nightmares over islander's 150+mph car
Someone get this lady a tissue she's all in her feels today sheesh............ Difference is your on your period and I don't know how to use a period I'll take the latter of the two.