Chevies worst motor the 305 vs fords best motor the 302
Only thing furd did was build a cheap car. It was light and that's about all that could be said for it.
Sure....na of course
1le's went 13.9 to
They right by my house. I've talked to those guys.
Actually gm did. The camaros evolved nicely during that time......handled great and 305s out powered the 30poo.
Only thing furd did was build a cheap car. It was light and that's about all that could be said for it.
1le's went 13.9 to
Actually gm did. The camaros evolved nicely during that time......handled great and 305s out powered the 30poo.
Only thing furd did was build a cheap car. It was light and that's about all that could be said for it.
1le's went 13.9 to
That's cool, I would have loved to have that G92. Overwhelming majority of people don't give a crap about road course performance, they care about straight line performance. No, if GM gave a **** about performance, they would have thrown the ZF6 and some 3.42 gears into the L98 IROC. Instead they used 2.77 gears and the 700R4, hiding 3.23's behind an overpriced option package. The one time they DID run 3.23's behind the R4, it was .2 behind the C4 and half the price.
1LE was a performance model but hidden
1993 Cobra went 13.7s oops
Teching In
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 6
Likes: 191
From: FL
No you haven't
Sure....na of course
Sure....na of course
That's cool, I would have loved to have that G92. Overwhelming majority of people don't give a crap about road course performance, they care about straight line performance. No, if GM gave a **** about performance, they would have thrown the ZF6 and some 3.42 gears into the L98 IROC. Instead they used 2.77 gears and the 700R4, hiding 3.23's behind an overpriced option package. The one time they DID run 3.23's behind the R4, it was .2 behind the C4 and half the price.
So .....how much money you sending me? I took your bet bitch.
All that ******* junk setting there would get walked by a bolt on ls6 when ran na🤣🤣🤣
You about a dumb bitch
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...mparison-test/
But it did get smoked by the other cars built in 93.
Tell the crowd how your tpi car was faster than your fox......oooppppssy
Teching In
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 6
Likes: 191
From: FL
Nothing under 800 rwhp counts
So .....how much money you sending me? I took your bet bitch.
All that ******* junk setting there would get walked by a bolt on ls6 when ran na🤣🤣🤣
Why are you ducking?
Why are you stipping your way out of a race?
You about a dumb bitch
That's your excuse? Emissions? Even though they did 3.42's and a 6 speed in the L98 Vette...
93 cobro wasn't going 13.7
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...mparison-test/
But it did get smoked by the other cars built in 93.
Tell the crowd how your tpi car was faster than your fox......oooppppssy
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...mparison-test/
But it did get smoked by the other cars built in 93.
Tell the crowd how your tpi car was faster than your fox......oooppppssy
Cobra had no shot against a 350 LT1 Fbody. More compression cubes and more gear. Those too were underated. They should have been rated at 300HP
Yes Formula was faster. Was a 350 car. What is scary is what it should come with from the factory.. aluminum heads like the Vette. Other scary thing was I raced a stock 1991 Z28 hardtop 350 and lost stock to stock. Those speed density cars were a tad faster. And I was heavier than him. I saw that car at Crapital go 14.0 98 MPH. You and I argued about the looks of those. Few weeks later I had SLP cold air,SLP stage 2 Prom ,air foil,took screen out of my MAF,AFPR and added 5 psi,over inflated my front tires, plastic 1992 Ttops,1LE aluminum DS and ported my Plenum. 13.5 101 MPH and got him good. Then he did the SLP stuff along with headers but car got totaled before rematch
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 226
From: over dere
Yea emissions and cafe standards limit alot of what a manufacturer can do. Especially when you involve costs and price point.
It's not a free for all.
I remember those cars when new. Many people went 13.7 with them. Did you see what Car and Driver ran with the 98 Z28 when it debuted? High 13s 104 and somehow the 98 Cobra was faster. We know all of that is false. First F bombs with LS were low 13s 107 easy with a M6. Auto 323 cars mid 13s 105ish.
Cobra had no shot against a 350 LT1 Fbody. More compression cubes and more gear. Those too were underated. They should have been rated at 300HP
Yes Formula was faster. Was a 350 car. What is scary is what it should come with from the factory.. aluminum heads like the Vette. Other scary thing was I raced a stock 1991 Z28 hardtop 350 and lost stock to stock. Those speed density cars were a tad faster. And I was heavier than him. I saw that car at Crapital go 14.0 98 MPH. You and I argued about the looks of those. Few weeks later I had SLP cold air,SLP stage 2 Prom ,air foil,took screen out of my MAF,AFPR and added 5 psi,over inflated my front tires, plastic 1992 Ttops,1LE aluminum DS and ported my Plenum. 13.5 101 MPH and got him good. Then he did the SLP stuff along with headers but car got totaled before rematch
Cobra had no shot against a 350 LT1 Fbody. More compression cubes and more gear. Those too were underated. They should have been rated at 300HP
Yes Formula was faster. Was a 350 car. What is scary is what it should come with from the factory.. aluminum heads like the Vette. Other scary thing was I raced a stock 1991 Z28 hardtop 350 and lost stock to stock. Those speed density cars were a tad faster. And I was heavier than him. I saw that car at Crapital go 14.0 98 MPH. You and I argued about the looks of those. Few weeks later I had SLP cold air,SLP stage 2 Prom ,air foil,took screen out of my MAF,AFPR and added 5 psi,over inflated my front tires, plastic 1992 Ttops,1LE aluminum DS and ported my Plenum. 13.5 101 MPH and got him good. Then he did the SLP stuff along with headers but car got totaled before rematch
It was common for lt1s to run 13s stock.
a friend went 16.1 with his stock 4.sux 2v. Grand am gts were faster than those turds
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 226
From: over dere
That's the vette. It's more expensive so it got the 6speed vs a auto or 5speed.
Yea emissions and cafe standards limit alot of what a manufacturer can do. Especially when you involve costs and price point.
It's not a free for all.
No one went 13.7 with a stock 30p00 fox. 13s at all is hard to believe for a stock production fox. Furds known to throw ringers out.
It was common for lt1s to run 13s stock.
a friend went 16.1 with his stock 4.sux 2v. Grand am gts were faster than those turds
Yea emissions and cafe standards limit alot of what a manufacturer can do. Especially when you involve costs and price point.
It's not a free for all.
No one went 13.7 with a stock 30p00 fox. 13s at all is hard to believe for a stock production fox. Furds known to throw ringers out.
It was common for lt1s to run 13s stock.
a friend went 16.1 with his stock 4.sux 2v. Grand am gts were faster than those turds
4.6 GT was actually slower than the same car with a 5.0. OUCH. 98 version a little better and maybe a tad faster than a 95. Dark days. PI cars were an improvement but a little too late because LS F body
I just showed a mag going 13s with a speed density 87 car. Few mags got them to go that fast. Cobra had better intake bigger tb better heads roller rockers. Go in any Mustang Forum and search. A 93 Cobra going 13s was pretty common. 94 Cobra however was slower 
LT1s new were faster. Even an auto. Bigger motor more gear more compression. No brainier. Ford didn't have a Corvette type car to get handi me downs. 98 it even got worse.
302 actually made more than 4.6 non pi. More torque and actually made same power up top too. Crazy. Except for the crack intake manifolds they were very reliable though
That's the vette. It's more expensive so it got the 6speed vs a auto or 5speed.
Yea emissions and cafe standards limit alot of what a manufacturer can do. Especially when you involve costs and price point.
It's not a free for all.
No one went 13.7 with a stock 30p00 fox. 13s at all is hard to believe for a stock production fox. Furds known to throw ringers out.
It was common for lt1s to run 13s stock.
a friend went 16.1 with his stock 4.sux 2v. Grand am gts were faster than those turds
Yea emissions and cafe standards limit alot of what a manufacturer can do. Especially when you involve costs and price point.
It's not a free for all.
No one went 13.7 with a stock 30p00 fox. 13s at all is hard to believe for a stock production fox. Furds known to throw ringers out.
It was common for lt1s to run 13s stock.
a friend went 16.1 with his stock 4.sux 2v. Grand am gts were faster than those turds
LT1s new were faster. Even an auto. Bigger motor more gear more compression. No brainier. Ford didn't have a Corvette type car to get handi me downs. 98 it even got worse.