Moe-Ron in a C6
#24
STF Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: POST OFFICE
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by black_z
What a tool. I had a kid with a stock RSX preaching to me about power to weight ratio.
#26
Administrator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by enisguy
I was hoping C6 drivers would be cool, but it looks like their no different than most good ole C5 drivers...
I can't wait for the Z06 to come out so I can destroy a few of them.
#27
Originally Posted by unit213
I'm sure it was just this one *** clown. A whole group of car owners surely can't be that stupid...can they? I hope not.
I can't wait for the Z06 to come out so I can destroy a few of them.
I can't wait for the Z06 to come out so I can destroy a few of them.
I dunno... Mustang guys are pretty stupid!
#28
Originally Posted by enisguy
I was hoping C6 drivers would be cool, but it looks like their no different than most good ole C5 drivers...
#29
Administrator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by AOC
Nice generalization. Ford guys think GM guys are tools, domestic guys think import guys are tools and vice versa. SRT guys think Camaro guys are redneck retards...This type of thinking is retarded, just because there are some jerks in C5 or any other model of vehicle, that doesn't mean everybody with same model of car behaves in a same manner.
Camaro guys are redneck retards though.
#30
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unit213
Uh oh...I think someone found a sore spot. Touchy, touchy huh? Just kidding...
Camaro guys are redneck retards though.
Camaro guys are redneck retards though.
J/K
#33
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (42)
Originally Posted by Stanger88
I read an article on the C6 that stated that they were 13.XX and 12.9 cars in the 1/4. I just glanced at it and did not see the exact reason. I do, however know that the magazine stated that most of the 1/4 times people have been reporting for C6's are in the low 13's range. Stock, GM quotes 12.6 M6 and 13.1-2 for the Auto. My personal opinion is that after 01-02 nothing from GM made much more hp than the stock LS1 with an LS6 intake in a TA or Z except maybe the Z06 version, the rest was marketing and hype. I personally expected more from the new Vette, but they do look nice...
Stock for stock a 2002-2004 Z06 will run 12.3 ( good driver on drag radials will run high 11's) the new C6 with a six speed and Z51 pkg. will run around a 12.6..Z06 pulls over a G on the skid pad and the C6 pulls about .93 G..close but not the same..Z06 comes in almost 200 lbs. lighter is a real street figher..not many buttons and bells...C6 is nice smooth, refined, and sneeky fast and has all the fluff...real diffferent personalities...up over 145MPH the C6 will start to pull away on the Z06..better drag coefficient and a more agressive 5th gear than the Z06...stock f body cars are not in this league..
#35
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by slt200mph
Stock for stock a 2002-2004 Z06 will run 12.3 ( good driver on drag radials will run high 11's) the new C6 with a six speed and Z51 pkg. will run around a 12.6..Z06 pulls over a G on the skid pad and the C6 pulls about .93 G..close but not the same..Z06 comes in almost 200 lbs. lighter is a real street figher..not many buttons and bells...C6 is nice smooth, refined, and sneeky fast and has all the fluff...real diffferent personalities...up over 145MPH the C6 will start to pull away on the Z06..better drag coefficient and a more agressive 5th gear than the Z06...stock f body cars are not in this league..
The C-6 was never made for drag racing. The entire care was tested and tuned at Nurburgring in Germany. Idiots who think the C-6 is king of the road stop light to stop light are dead wrong. I have driven a C-6 (thought about getting rid of the hawk), and by far it is the fastest car I have driven over 100mph, better than a 911 or a viper. Plus, the C-6 is a hellovalot smoother ride. Please don't knock a vette just because it got beat by a car set-up for 1/4 mile racing. BTW, I drove the C-6 at atlanta motor speedway, and barely broke the Ice in the throttle-and it in no way lacks torque like was mentioned.
P.S. Nice kill unit!!!!
#36
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Quad Cities, IL
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 02transhawk
Please don't knock a vette just because it got beat by a car set-up for 1/4 mile racing.
P.S. Nice kill unit!!!!
P.S. Nice kill unit!!!!
#37
Administrator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by 02transhawk
Please don't knock a vette just because it got beat by a car set-up for 1/4 mile racing.
The C6 is setup for drag racing just as much as my car...actually it's much better off at the track stock suspension for stock suspension.
#38
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Navarre, FL
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unit213
Uh oh...I think someone found a sore spot. Touchy, touchy huh? Just kidding...
Camaro guys are redneck retards though.
Camaro guys are redneck retards though.
#39
Administrator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by SStheBest
lol almost....20 years old and BLACK i might add.... and i own this......
#40
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hollidaysburg, PA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unit213
My car absolutely is NOT setup for drag racing. It's a daily driver with 100% bone stock suspension and stock wheels all around. Of course I run drag radials in the summer, but that is a DOT approved tire that sees heavy rain...certainly not slicks and skinnies.
The C6 is setup for drag racing just as much as my car...actually it's much better off at the track stock suspension for stock suspension.
The C6 is setup for drag racing just as much as my car...actually it's much better off at the track stock suspension for stock suspension.