Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Lt-1 Vs. Ls-what?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-2005, 11:48 PM
  #181  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Car RamRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: nyc
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Im curious, what vehicles continued to use the lt1 after 97? When did the trucks switch to the lsx engine?

Also, wasnt the origional lt1 and optional corvette engine? Something like a 350ci with 335hp?
Car RamRod is offline  
Old 12-07-2005, 12:17 AM
  #182  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
1994Z28Lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Elko MN
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

damn this thread is old isn't it well since i wasn't on the site almost a year ago to witness it i will just have to add my .02 right now sorry guys, i hope i dont start another lt1 vs ls1 flame war because they are both great motors to bless f-body owners

his story is kind of fishy but not totally unbelieveable in my oppinion because i have had the same experiences with some ls1's

two of them definitely come to mind one was a 98 T/A with the cats hacked out of it A4 CAI 2.73 rear and from a 10 mph roll i hooked slightly better and kept a half a car on him til about 60-70 where he put about a car on me and then to my amazement once he hit 3rd gear i started pulling past him again and we let off at about 110-120 with me about a car ahead of him

another ls1 i raced was my buddies 00 Z28 A4 3.23 rear end with a fresh motor (7000 miles) with an slp lid and that was it, we went from a dead stop he got a jump on me being as how it was an auto and i kept within a car length of him all the way to about 110-120 again where we let off

my car is a 94 Z28 M6 3.42 rear end with hooker catback, slp intake, dynatech distributor (not that it adds anything) msd wires and that it, at the time of the races it had about 65000 miles on it when i had it on the dyno at about 70,000 miles it put down almost 271 hp and 314.4 ft/lbs of torque and the torque curve went over 300 ft/lbs right when i floored it at 2000 rpm and sustained it all the way to 4500 rpm

you can take a look at my printout at the link at the bottom of my sig

this is just from my experience i realize 270 at the wheels is definitely not typical for a basically stock lt1 but is definitely possible
1994Z28Lt1 is offline  
Old 12-07-2005, 01:26 AM
  #183  
STF veteran / 10 second club
iTrader: (14)
 
x phantom x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 3,376
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Car RamRod
Im curious, what vehicles continued to use the lt1 after 97? When did the trucks switch to the lsx engine?

Also, wasnt the origional lt1 and optional corvette engine? Something like a 350ci with 335hp?

The LT1 was in service for a long time ... just about the same length as the LS1 .... and in many different model cars. Y-Bods (Corvette), B/D Bods (Caprice, Impala SS), F-Bods (Firebird/Camaro), etc ... all had the LT1 available (or standard). A few trucks also used different variants of the LT1.

The original LT1 in the '92 vette was 300 hp. The option you're thinking of is the LT4, which was offered in '96 if memory serves me ... it used better heads, more cam timing, roller rockers and sequential fuel injection to make 330 hp. There was also the "Baby LT1," the 265 cid version that was the standard engine in the Caprice from 1994-‘96.

x phantom x is offline  
Old 12-07-2005, 01:47 AM
  #184  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Redneck Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Citrus Heights, CA
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 1994Z28Lt1
damn this thread is old isn't it well since i wasn't on the site almost a year ago to witness it i will just have to add my .02 right now sorry guys, i hope i dont start another lt1 vs ls1 flame war because they are both great motors to bless f-body owners

his story is kind of fishy but not totally unbelieveable in my oppinion because i have had the same experiences with some ls1's

two of them definitely come to mind one was a 98 T/A with the cats hacked out of it A4 CAI 2.73 rear and from a 10 mph roll i hooked slightly better and kept a half a car on him til about 60-70 where he put about a car on me and then to my amazement once he hit 3rd gear i started pulling past him again and we let off at about 110-120 with me about a car ahead of him

another ls1 i raced was my buddies 00 Z28 A4 3.23 rear end with a fresh motor (7000 miles) with an slp lid and that was it, we went from a dead stop he got a jump on me being as how it was an auto and i kept within a car length of him all the way to about 110-120 again where we let off

my car is a 94 Z28 M6 3.42 rear end with hooker catback, slp intake, dynatech distributor (not that it adds anything) msd wires and that it, at the time of the races it had about 65000 miles on it when i had it on the dyno at about 70,000 miles it put down almost 271 hp and 314.4 ft/lbs of torque and the torque curve went over 300 ft/lbs right when i floored it at 2000 rpm and sustained it all the way to 4500 rpm

you can take a look at my printout at the link at the bottom of my sig

this is just from my experience i realize 270 at the wheels is definitely not typical for a basically stock lt1 but is definitely possible
Consider yourself lucky, because those results aren't normal. You beat a car that had more hp and torque, and weighed less than you. The driver can make a big difference in the outcome also. Your 1/4 times are pretty good, but still short of stock LS1 territory. A stock LS1 should put a couple cars on a stock or nearly stock LT1.
Redneck Z is offline  
Old 12-07-2005, 02:10 AM
  #185  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
1994Z28Lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Elko MN
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i know those results aren't normal i even stated that. i am not trying to argue the typical lt1 stock for stock is equivalent to the ls1 i am not that ignorant.

i was just stating some of my experiences with my car (which isn't typical) compared to some ls1 cars i have encountered. a good running lt1 such as the one i have, can run neck and neck with a mediocre running ls1 especially on street tires, driver experience/skill, and running on the street in general which is a heck of a lot different than running at the track

lets look at some numbers, my car puts down 270.9 hp and 314.4 ft/lbs of tq which is definitely a strong running nearly stock lt1 when compared to a mediocre running ls1 in the 280-290 hp range its really not that unbelievable that i can run with them and beat a select few
1994Z28Lt1 is offline  
Old 12-07-2005, 02:33 AM
  #186  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Redneck Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Citrus Heights, CA
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I agree with you. A weak LS1 should still pull the win, but if you drive well and the other guy doesn't, I could see you winning. I beat LS1's every once in awhile in my 4.6 GT, but it wasn't because I had the faster car. I drove well and/or got lucky, and they spun too much and didn't drive well, etc. Anything "can" happen.
Redneck Z is offline  
Old 12-07-2005, 03:16 PM
  #187  
Teching In
 
noride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: pembroke pines
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i ran a lt1 last week on 595 in florida and gave him an *** kick like no other 98 ss
noride is offline  
Old 12-07-2005, 03:30 PM
  #188  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
slowmofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

holy old thread Batman
slowmofo is offline  
Old 12-07-2005, 03:38 PM
  #189  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Car RamRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: nyc
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by xphantomws6x
The original LT1 in the '92 vette was 300 hp. The option you're thinking of is the LT4, which was offered in '96 if memory serves me ... it used better heads, more cam timing, roller rockers and sequential fuel injection to make 330 hp. There was also the "Baby LT1," the 265 cid version that was the standard engine in the Caprice from 1994-‘96.

I meant the origional lt1 as in the 1960s era engine.
I knew that the lt1 had been used for several years, but when did its life officially end?
Car RamRod is offline  
Old 12-08-2005, 01:55 AM
  #190  
STF veteran / 10 second club
iTrader: (14)
 
x phantom x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 3,376
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Car RamRod
I meant the origional lt1 as in the 1960s era engine.
I knew that the lt1 had been used for several years, but when did its life officially end?
LT1 and LT-1 are completely different motors. So now which engine are you talking about in your above statement? That little dash (or lack of) does actually completely change the engine you're talking about.
.
x phantom x is offline  
Old 12-09-2005, 12:47 PM
  #191  
11 Second Club
 
darrensls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sandwich, IL
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

stock LS1 > stock LT1

This hasn't changed in the last 10 months.

That is all.
darrensls1 is offline  
Old 12-09-2005, 07:17 PM
  #192  
Staging Lane
 
BeaversTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watauga, TX
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

All I have to say is all you LS1 humpers are gay. I have owned both and yes the LS1 is faster but any thing can happen on the street. I beat LS1's all the time with my bolt on LT1. Should they beat me sure but things happen on the street. Oh and not all LS1's run low 13's, my friends 02 A4 Z28 ran a 9.0 @ 80 with a 2.1 60ft with a K&n and a cut out and my 96 A4 TA ran a 8.9@ 80 on a 2.0 60 ft. with a K&N and a cut out. The 01 A4 SS I had ran a 8.7@ 85 on a 2.1 60ft. They don't all run the same. You guys are the reason why I don't buy another LS1 I don't want to become a *** that thinks I drive the fastest car out there. Oh and yes I can afford one. I don't car how fast a car is at the track what it does on the street is a whole different game. Hell I got beat by a Neon in my 01 SS. As for dyno #'s not all LS1's put down 320rwhp.
BeaversTA is offline  
Old 12-09-2005, 07:23 PM
  #193  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BeaversTA
All I have to say is all you LS1 humpers are gay. I have owned both and yes the LS1 is faster but any thing can happen on the street. I beat LS1's all the time with my bolt on LT1. Should they beat me sure but things happen on the street. Oh and not all LS1's run low 13's, my friends 02 A4 Z28 ran a 9.0 @ 80 with a 2.1 60ft with a K&n and a cut out and my 96 A4 TA ran a 8.9@ 80 on a 2.0 60 ft. with a K&N and a cut out. The 01 A4 SS I had ran a 8.7@ 85 on a 2.1 60ft. They don't all run the same. You guys are the reason why I don't buy another LS1 I don't want to become a *** that thinks I drive the fastest car out there. Oh and yes I can afford one. I don't car how fast a car is at the track what it does on the street is a whole different game. Hell I got beat by a Neon in my 01 SS. As for dyno #'s not all LS1's put down 320rwhp.
That's good!
SouthFL.02.SS is offline  
Old 12-09-2005, 08:12 PM
  #194  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Car RamRod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: nyc
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by xphantomws6x
LT1 and LT-1 are completely different motors. So now which engine are you talking about in your above statement? That little dash (or lack of) does actually completely change the engine you're talking about.
.
when I said
Also, wasnt the origional lt1 an optional corvette engine? Something like a 350ci with 335hp?
I was refering to the late 60's vette engine, which I believe you are refering to as the LT-1.

When I asked about the service years of the lt1 however, I meant the recent engine found in the c4 corvette, 93-97 fbody's, etc. I know very well the differences between the 1990's era lt1, and the traditional sbc, Im just wondering about when the lt1 was officially dropped from the chevy lineup.
Car RamRod is offline  
Old 12-09-2005, 10:24 PM
  #195  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
1994Z28Lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Elko MN
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

97 was the last year it ended it's life in the f-bodies because the vette got the ls1 in 97
1994Z28Lt1 is offline  
Old 12-10-2005, 10:48 AM
  #196  
11 Second Club
 
darrensls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sandwich, IL
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BeaversTA
All I have to say is all you LS1 humpers are gay. I have owned both and yes the LS1 is faster but any thing can happen on the street. I beat LS1's all the time with my bolt on LT1. Should they beat me sure but things happen on the street. Oh and not all LS1's run low 13's, my friends 02 A4 Z28 ran a 9.0 @ 80 with a 2.1 60ft with a K&n and a cut out and my 96 A4 TA ran a 8.9@ 80 on a 2.0 60 ft. with a K&N and a cut out. The 01 A4 SS I had ran a 8.7@ 85 on a 2.1 60ft. They don't all run the same. You guys are the reason why I don't buy another LS1 I don't want to become a *** that thinks I drive the fastest car out there. Oh and yes I can afford one. I don't car how fast a car is at the track what it does on the street is a whole different game. Hell I got beat by a Neon in my 01 SS. As for dyno #'s not all LS1's put down 320rwhp.
LS1's are a half second faster. Sorry to hurt your feelings but it's true. But what is you take a M6 LT1 that was built on a Wednesday and driven by Evan Smith and race a 98 A4 ls1 with 2.73's and was built on a Monday? Well then you have a race that the LT1 can win. But guess what lies at the other end of that spectrum?

What if you have a 2002 M6 LS1 that was built on a Wednesday and driven by Evan Smith racing a 95 A4 with 2.73's and was built on a Monday? Well then you have close to a 2 second massacre on your hands. The LT1 guys never seem to want to talk about that potential match up. I wonder why?

But what if we were fair? Same transmissions, gears and driver skills. In most cases the LS1 is a mid 13 second car and the LT1 is a 14 second car. The LS1 is a solid half a second faster. Even a full second is often considered the higher end of "normal" in respects to stock vs stock.

It's nothing personal. It's just how it is. People like jaredwayt can't handle this and make up stories to try and make themselves feel better. But what he doesn't get is that you can admit other cars are faster and still feel good about what you drive. I know 03/04 Cobras, LS6's and LS7's all have my number. But I don't care. My little old LS1 is suiting me just fine.
darrensls1 is offline  
Old 12-10-2005, 11:14 AM
  #197  
STF veteran / 10 second club
iTrader: (14)
 
x phantom x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 3,376
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BeaversTA
All I have to say is all you LS1 humpers are gay. I have owned both and yes the LS1 is faster but any thing can happen on the street. (Rest is garbage)....

Hey ... so what exactly is it that you're arguing with us "LS1 humpers" about? You agreed that the LS1 is faster, which is what everyone has been saying? We stated facts, we become "LS1 humpers" ... you stated the same fact, does that make you one too?

Hey, NEWS FLASH!!! A Z06 vette is faster than a GT Stang .... I must be an "LS6 Humper."

x phantom x is offline  
Old 12-10-2005, 08:56 PM
  #198  
Staging Lane
 
BeaversTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watauga, TX
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Gay LS1 humpers,
Apparently owning a LS1 also in pears your reading comprehension. Know one is arguing that LS1's are not faster except for you guys. It’s a fact 99 percent of the time we all know it. You guys keep skipping the fact that any thing can happen on the street. So yes his story could be true. Is it what happens 98 percent of the time? NO, but it could happen. Why can't yall accept this? It’s not that hard. I have beaten them at the track and on the street. Should I? NO, but **** happens. Deal with it!

darrensls1,
You just when't against every thing you guys have been saying when you said "But what is you take a M6 LT1 that was built on a Wednesday and driven by Evan Smith and race a 98 A4 ls1 with 2.73's and was built on a Monday? Well then you have a race that the LT1 can win. But guess what lies at the other end of that spectrum?"

So you now state that it could happen. What are you arguing about?

xphantomws6x,
I'm not arguing. I clearly stated that not all LS1's are a Half a second faster than every LT1. I even gave examples to prove my point. I then stated that any thing can happen on the street. This is when you become a LS1 humper and chose to ignore this fact. That's what keeps me from becoming a humper.
BeaversTA is offline  
Old 12-10-2005, 09:17 PM
  #199  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
B.W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: GB, MD
Posts: 535
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BeaversTA
Gay LS1 humpers,
Apparently owning a LS1 also in pears your reading comprehension. Know one is arguing that LS1's are not faster except for you guys. It’s a fact 99 percent of the time we all know it. You guys keep skipping the fact that any thing can happen on the street. So yes his story could be true. Is it what happens 98 percent of the time? NO, but it could happen. Why can't yall accept this? It’s not that hard. I have beaten them at the track and on the street. Should I? NO, but **** happens. Deal with it!

darrensls1,
You just when't against every thing you guys have been saying when you said "But what is you take a M6 LT1 that was built on a Wednesday and driven by Evan Smith and race a 98 A4 ls1 with 2.73's and was built on a Monday? Well then you have a race that the LT1 can win. But guess what lies at the other end of that spectrum?"

So you now state that it could happen. What are you arguing about?

xphantomws6x,
I'm not arguing. I clearly stated that not all LS1's are a Half a second faster than every LT1. I even gave examples to prove my point. I then stated that any thing can happen on the street. This is when you become a LS1 humper and chose to ignore this fact. That's what keeps me from becoming a humper.
What is your native language? jk dude.

I think the point is that under certain conditions an LT1 can beat an LS1, but on the street it is a very low probability.
B.W. is offline  
Old 12-10-2005, 09:19 PM
  #200  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (30)
 
DAVESS02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Springfield, IL
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'm a damn proud humper. In fact, everytime I flog mine, BOINGGGGG!!!!!
DAVESS02 is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 PM.