Just drove brand new mach 1... Scouting report
02-28-2018, 08:03 PM
#82
02-28-2018, 09:47 PM
#83
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-28-2018, 09:56 PM
#84
02-28-2018, 10:05 PM
#85
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-28-2018, 10:44 PM
#88
03-01-2018, 02:33 AM
#91
And then there's this for maximum butthurt.
Z28 ran 13.8@104, mustang ran 14.2@98. Hmm, two car lengths 4 tenths, my expert math skills tells me that 1 car length = .2. Mustang ran low 14's, Z28 was high 13's@104. Notice how everything I say is accurate? Almost like I've owned a metric **** ton of these cars and know exactly what each is capable of. Here is the article, test results are in PDF format.
https://www.caranddriver.com/compari...ved-comparison
Z28 ran 13.8@104, mustang ran 14.2@98. Hmm, two car lengths 4 tenths, my expert math skills tells me that 1 car length = .2. Mustang ran low 14's, Z28 was high 13's@104. Notice how everything I say is accurate? Almost like I've owned a metric **** ton of these cars and know exactly what each is capable of. Here is the article, test results are in PDF format.
https://www.caranddriver.com/compari...ved-comparison
03-01-2018, 02:48 AM
#92
TECH Junkie
03-01-2018, 06:20 AM
#93
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-01-2018, 06:23 AM
#94
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And then there's this for maximum butthurt.
Z28 ran 13.8@104, mustang ran 14.2@98. Hmm, two car lengths 4 tenths, my expert math skills tells me that 1 car length = .2. Mustang ran low 14's, Z28 was high 13's@104. Notice how everything I say is accurate? Almost like I've owned a metric **** ton of these cars and know exactly what each is capable of. Here is the article, test results are in PDF format.
https://www.caranddriver.com/compari...ved-comparison
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJSxXBHZgJk
Z28 ran 13.8@104, mustang ran 14.2@98. Hmm, two car lengths 4 tenths, my expert math skills tells me that 1 car length = .2. Mustang ran low 14's, Z28 was high 13's@104. Notice how everything I say is accurate? Almost like I've owned a metric **** ton of these cars and know exactly what each is capable of. Here is the article, test results are in PDF format.
https://www.caranddriver.com/compari...ved-comparison
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJSxXBHZgJk
And 13.8 for an ls1 was driven by another idiot.
03-01-2018, 12:02 PM
#96
I've already acknowledged that, but the number of 12 second stock Fbodies was extremely low. The vast majority, in normal conditions with normal drivers was mid 13's. It's just like 2v's that were trapping 102 and hitting mid 13's, incredibly rare.
03-01-2018, 03:34 PM
#98
On The Tree
03-01-2018, 08:14 PM
#100
And then there's this for maximum butthurt.
Z28 ran 13.8@104, mustang ran 14.2@98. Hmm, two car lengths 4 tenths, my expert math skills tells me that 1 car length = .2. Mustang ran low 14's, Z28 was high 13's@104. Notice how everything I say is accurate? Almost like I've owned a metric **** ton of these cars and know exactly what each is capable of. Here is the article, test results are in PDF format.
https://www.caranddriver.com/compari...ved-comparison
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJSxXBHZgJk
Z28 ran 13.8@104, mustang ran 14.2@98. Hmm, two car lengths 4 tenths, my expert math skills tells me that 1 car length = .2. Mustang ran low 14's, Z28 was high 13's@104. Notice how everything I say is accurate? Almost like I've owned a metric **** ton of these cars and know exactly what each is capable of. Here is the article, test results are in PDF format.
https://www.caranddriver.com/compari...ved-comparison
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJSxXBHZgJk