Dan03mach1.....I call BS
I think the point is that the language used by Dan03Mach1 is misleading. While he is correct that the engine itself is not modded, by not mentioning the spray, he is essentially concealing it. It is a perception issue IMHO.
Originally Posted by Redneck Z
I totally see where you are comming from with that remark: 12.04@112.27 (1.57 60ft)
An LS1 would be trapping more like 120 mph with that e.t.
An LS1 would be trapping more like 120 mph with that e.t.
10.8-11.2 (seconds in the quartermile) If I saw any car running 12.0 with a trap speed of 120 or higher, I automatically assume driver error, traction, or high-way car. This is all based on my assumption.
Dan03mach's car is a 100% stock motor with bolt-on's + suspension work and weight reduction, thats what he said it was right? "Stock motor with nitrous"....that sounds wrong to you?
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
From: Long island, NY
Originally Posted by Gloveperson
I think the point is that the language used by Dan03Mach1 is misleading. While he is correct that the engine itself is not modded, by not mentioning the spray, he is essentially concealing it. It is a perception issue IMHO.
I know a lot of people think this is petty and for the most part it is, but is was a culmination over a period of time and after a few recent threads I finally had to say something. And this wasn't meant to be this major personal attack...honestly, Dan seems like on ok guy, just will say that hopefully this will have a positive effect and tone these gangsters down a bit
Maybe at least SOME good can come from this.
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
From: Long island, NY
Originally Posted by Cam99
Your just jealous because my mullet is shaped nicer than yours. It's a perfect 30/70 split. 

Originally Posted by Big Jimbo
off topic: An LS1 would be trapping around 115mph in full trim/weight with that ET. An LS1 trapping 120mph should be running anywhere from
10.8-11.2 (seconds in the quartermile) If I saw any car running 12.0 with a trap speed of 120 or higher, I automatically assume driver error, traction, or high-way car. This is all based on my assumption.
Dan03mach's car is a 100% stock motor with bolt-on's + suspension work and weight reduction, thats what he said it was right? "Stock motor with nitrous"....that sounds wrong to you?
10.8-11.2 (seconds in the quartermile) If I saw any car running 12.0 with a trap speed of 120 or higher, I automatically assume driver error, traction, or high-way car. This is all based on my assumption.
Dan03mach's car is a 100% stock motor with bolt-on's + suspension work and weight reduction, thats what he said it was right? "Stock motor with nitrous"....that sounds wrong to you?
Originally Posted by dan03mach
Damn KB99WS6 if you are going on a public board to talk crap at least get all of your facts straight.. All you had to do is ask and I would have told you.. 

Yeah........I agree with you about that, but its more fun to read and post up your opinions, etc.
This is why I love this site so much.
Originally Posted by Roarin_8
I'm close to that ET of 12.0 but no where close to that trap speed of 115 for the LS1. Depends on the setup. 






