S2000 wants a TA after race!
#201
If torque don't mean squat then whats the purpose of bigger gears, normally when people get bigger gears (bigger gears give more torque) they get better 0-60 times?
Not flaming anyone just asking cause I have no idea.
Not flaming anyone just asking cause I have no idea.
#203
Originally Posted by BLACKTURBOS2K
Ill ask one more time, do you have a faster car then mine? No? I didnt think so. So you dumb ***. Dont say anything else til you do
On top of that YOU drive a fu_king HONDA. You are a dumb ****. You have done nothing but **** out of your mouth. You have a damn HONDA CBR 600. I will **** on your bike and your Vett. Where are all of the vids you talk about? Where are your time slips? Im sure you dont have anything to show us do you. I can back my **** up can you? You seem more like the here is you.
On top of that YOU drive a fu_king HONDA. You are a dumb ****. You have done nothing but **** out of your mouth. You have a damn HONDA CBR 600. I will **** on your bike and your Vett. Where are all of the vids you talk about? Where are your time slips? Im sure you dont have anything to show us do you. I can back my **** up can you? You seem more like the here is you.
Run better than a 10.63 @ 127.48
I am not going to ******* scan timeslips, dyno sheets, or whatever. I'm sorry, but your not going to get a "wow, badass S2000" from me. On my way back from the dyno one day I came across a heavily modded S2000. I'd say it was similar to yours. I doubt it ran as fast at the 1/4th, but it was definately something. I ******* wasted that thing about 4 times in a row. Get the **** out with that ****.
#204
heres your boost http://www.ihra.com/statistics/records/index.html
heres the pro mod cars....
look under PM
and look under PS for the IHRA times
prostock (naturally aspirated) ROBERT PATRICK
ROCKINGHAM
Oct-05
6.360
FRANK GUGLIOTTA EPPING Sep-05
220.26
Pro mod with boost
MIKE BELL
ROCKINGHAM
Oct-05 6.046
STEVE BAREMAN
EPPING
Sep-05
236.46
heres the pro mod cars....
look under PM
and look under PS for the IHRA times
prostock (naturally aspirated) ROBERT PATRICK
ROCKINGHAM
Oct-05
6.360
FRANK GUGLIOTTA EPPING Sep-05
220.26
Pro mod with boost
MIKE BELL
ROCKINGHAM
Oct-05 6.046
STEVE BAREMAN
EPPING
Sep-05
236.46
#207
Originally Posted by 00'WS6Rocket
If torque don't mean squat then whats the purpose of bigger gears, normally when people get bigger gears (bigger gears give more torque) they get better 0-60 times?
Not flaming anyone just asking cause I have no idea.
Not flaming anyone just asking cause I have no idea.
#210
Originally Posted by 25psi
Gears won't necessarily give you more power, they enable you to move the power band to the left.
#212
Originally Posted by BlackMagicC5
You'll **** on my bike AND my vette, huh? Not with your 11 second timeslip. You better get that ******* peice of **** in the 10's.
Run better than a 10.63 @ 127.48
I am not going to ******* scan timeslips, dyno sheets, or whatever. I'm sorry, but your not going to get a "wow, badass S2000" from me. On my way back from the dyno one day I came across a heavily modded S2000. I'd say it was similar to yours. I doubt it ran as fast at the 1/4th, but it was definately something. I ******* wasted that thing about 4 times in a row. Get the **** out with that ****.
Run better than a 10.63 @ 127.48
I am not going to ******* scan timeslips, dyno sheets, or whatever. I'm sorry, but your not going to get a "wow, badass S2000" from me. On my way back from the dyno one day I came across a heavily modded S2000. I'd say it was similar to yours. I doubt it ran as fast at the 1/4th, but it was definately something. I ******* wasted that thing about 4 times in a row. Get the **** out with that ****.
#214
Originally Posted by BlackMagicC5
Which enables you to be quicker down the 1/4th. So torque is extremely important in being fast. Gears usually lower your horsepower, but make you faster. So in your stupid horsepower over torque arguements, how do you explain that?
Gears enable you to move the powerband to the left of the dyno curve. It does not give you less hp, it gives you less top end(depending on what gears you want). So in essence, you make your powerband sooner in the rpm's.
#218
yeah im a stereotypical mexican, just like your probably some techno club freak, that listens to Dj ***?.....when the hell did this get about races you ****** ****, all im doing is defending f-bodies, we already have a **** load of peeps here giving you props for your s2000 yeah its fast, its a good car giving the german roadsters a run for there money no one is doubting that here....... its just that you come off cocky sounding like your s2000 is superior in every way to an f-body when its not....im just defending the cars i luv thats all.
#220
Originally Posted by 25psi
Do you understand what you just said. "Gears usually lower your horsepower, but make you faster"
Gears enable you to move the powerband to the left of the dyno curve. It does not give you less hp, it gives you less top end(depending on what gears you want). So in essence, you make your powerband sooner in the rpm's.
Gears enable you to move the powerband to the left of the dyno curve. It does not give you less hp, it gives you less top end(depending on what gears you want). So in essence, you make your powerband sooner in the rpm's.