*video* This Is The Video Ls1-450 Was Waiting To See - Meltdown Vs 68 Camaro
#81
Originally Posted by unit213
Great. I think we can all bring a REAL car. Perhaps you should've
brought that to the race with that Camaro.
brought that to the race with that Camaro.
#82
Originally Posted by 68maro
i walked to the trailer and grabbed two slips from the logbook.
when the new 632 big cheif goes in next month i hope to greatly improve these times. sad thing is for as quick as they are they're still not competitive for the way 10.5 racing has taken off.
sorry for the picture phone pics.
when the new 632 big cheif goes in next month i hope to greatly improve these times. sad thing is for as quick as they are they're still not competitive for the way 10.5 racing has taken off.
sorry for the picture phone pics.
#83
Administrator
Originally Posted by 68maro
sad thing is for as quick as they are they're still not competitive for the way 10.5 racing has taken off.
it's not good enough to win every race. Drag radial is insane these days too.
Originally Posted by wickedwarlock
Damn, he needs to be in the 7 second club.
#85
7.80's and 1.22 60's is slow. My NHRA advanced et license passes were quicker. Get a real backhalf and drop the *** end of that 68 camaro and junk that 632 Big Chief. No one runs that combo anymore. Get a pair of turbos on a smallblock and go 200+. Oh, nice vid. Very close race.
#86
Administrator
Originally Posted by meltdowns_backup
7.80's and 1.22 60's is slow. My NHRA advanced et license passes were quicker. Get a real backhalf and drop the *** end of that 68 camaro and junk that 632 Big Chief. No one runs that combo anymore. Get a pair of turbos on a smallblock and go 200+.
#87
#92
On The Tree
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Salinas, Ca
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 99FormulaM6
good vids Rastarajah...but you should get a different camera...that one kinda sucks...
I was at the end (AcE CAM) and it took me maybe 30 seconds to get it completely focued on the two cars. At the end you can tell who won, so thats all that matters. It would of been easier to have a tripod. I was getting tired of holding the camera for like 10 minutes. I would like a badass camera though hehe.
#94
Originally Posted by meltdowns_backup
7.80's and 1.22 60's is slow. My NHRA advanced et license passes were quicker. Get a real backhalf and drop the *** end of that 68 camaro and junk that 632 Big Chief. No one runs that combo anymore. Get a pair of turbos on a smallblock and go 200+. Oh, nice vid. Very close race.
#95
Administrator
Originally Posted by 68maro
thats pretty funny considering your car looked like a fiberglass tubechassis car if it's even your car anyone can find pics and videos to post where as i can prove mine because people on here know me and i've posted **** with proof i can go get timeslips or pics and put stuff on them or whatever you'd like. #2 it's funny you mentioned the backhalf the pic in my sig and the timeslips are from when i had a conventional head 555 in the car and it was a stockwheelwell untubbed laddrbar coilover 12 bolt all steel roll up glass 3550lb raceweight on a 29.5x10.5 tagged titled streetcar. i agree the *** end has to come down thats why it is now 25.2 sfi backhalfed with a fab9 and a 4link on a 33x10.5 with the 632. still all steel with rollup windows and stockfloorpan back to the wheeltubs because it's still a streetcar. not a fullblown racercar.
for that car. Backhalf cars are running 204-212mph these
days on 10.5W's. Drag radial cars are running 7.40's @ 19xmph for God's
sake. That sure looks like a tube chassis car to me.
#97
who gives a **** if his car is made of gold. The point is you said you are so fast and that 10 second cars are slow. We can bring you a REAL trailered car. Why don't you step up to the plate?
#99
Originally Posted by MELTDOWN
who gives a **** if his car is made of gold. The point is you said you are so fast and that 10 second cars are slow. We can bring you a REAL trailered car. Why don't you step up to the plate?