Owned.
#141
With a good form of induction (read:not my current carb) People have gone low 13's all day on a setup like mine. According to a notable engine builder in AR who ran the numbers on the setup (and came to within 5 whp of what the company claimed it dynoed, no-less) it should trap around 105 at a 3500# race weight. According to others who have the same setup, it traps 103ish on avg (they normally chose smaller gears than mine though and I think my gears may help by winding it out more in 4th).
Honestly, all self-hatred aside, the car should pull 13.4's at around 103 after its running right.
Honestly, all self-hatred aside, the car should pull 13.4's at around 103 after its running right.
#142
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: nyc
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AROD427
To quote someone from The Corral.net "You spend more money trying to save money" Some people just have to learn the hard way.
#143
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Car RamRod
I used to have a similar quote in my sig (on corral), it was actually "There is a lot of money to be spent saving money."
Jon
#144
I did not spare any money on this project, my transmission cost about $2500 including bellhousing, etc. for instance. That is 2.5x what I payed for the whole damn car. The GT40P heads were left on the new motor because my goal was 280-300whp and they would allow/facilitate that. We cant all have 1200whp and I picked 103-104 as my trap-speed goal.