BMW M6 mid to low 11sec car?
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: htown
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BMW M6 mid to low 11sec car?
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...f01f985487.htm
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...b320d73f34.htm
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...a82661c2ec.htm
These machines are fast as hell. I would like to see one go head to head with a stock c6 z06.
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...b320d73f34.htm
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...a82661c2ec.htm
These machines are fast as hell. I would like to see one go head to head with a stock c6 z06.
#4
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Salisbury N.C
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sprayed1998
how much power do they have and what do they weight? I really doubt they got **** on a C6Z06 but ya never know.
they have a 5.0 V10 that makes 507 hp and 383 lb-ft of torque. 0-62 in 4.6 seconds and 0-124 in 14 seconds
#5
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sugarland Texas
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jason02z28
they have a 5.0 V10 that makes 507 hp and 383 lb-ft of torque. 0-62 in 4.6 seconds and 0-124 in 14 seconds
#6
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: htown
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought the 966 and the vette were pretty close in 1/4 and trap speed. But the M6 totally destroyed it. Torque wont matter, especially if they do it from a roll.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: htown
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/bmw_m6.asp
Damn its not that much heavier than an ls1. Plus with an 8250 rpm redline, I would assume it would be a petty much even race with a c6 z06.
Damn its not that much heavier than an ls1. Plus with an 8250 rpm redline, I would assume it would be a petty much even race with a c6 z06.
#9
Ive seen mid 12s mostly for the new V10ed Bimmers. Very cool, but when it takes 14 seconds to get to 124 your not going to run low 11s.
I would love to see that motor mid mounted in a Zonda.
I would love to see that motor mid mounted in a Zonda.
#10
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: htown
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The m5 and m6 are rated at 500hp, but the m6 pulled it.
I dont beleive the loss of torque against the Z06 would matter. Hell it makes more torque than an ls1.
Lets see. Ford GT makes more torque than the Z06, but still gets walked. The vipers makes more torque, but still gets walked. If your going from a dead stop, torque would only apply to the 1st gear that your in. After that, you would be shifting at a point were you are past peak torque.
I dont beleive the loss of torque against the Z06 would matter. Hell it makes more torque than an ls1.
Lets see. Ford GT makes more torque than the Z06, but still gets walked. The vipers makes more torque, but still gets walked. If your going from a dead stop, torque would only apply to the 1st gear that your in. After that, you would be shifting at a point were you are past peak torque.
#11
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sugarland Texas
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chris, use your head here bro. You got two cars that both dyno about the same, the C6 Z06 would have about 100 more RWTQ and weight over ONE THOUSAND POUNDS less. What makes you think it would even be close? I know you like to start **** over here but this one is just stupid. I guess your saying the M6 is as fast as the Ford GT too huh.
#12
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: htown
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sparetire
Ive seen mid 12s mostly for the new V10ed Bimmers. Very cool, but when it takes 14 seconds to get to 124 your not going to run low 11s.
I would love to see that motor mid mounted in a Zonda.
I would love to see that motor mid mounted in a Zonda.
I doubt it takes 14 sec. to get to 124, since I assume that is about where it traps at.
#13
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sugarland Texas
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok it weights 3800 pounds, so assume 4000 even with a driver. So the Z06 has roughly a roughly 700-800 pound weight advantage and about 100ftlbs. The M6 would be a good run for a 450rwhp 03/04 cobra, lol.
#14
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: htown
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sprayed1998
Chris, use your head here bro. You got two cars that both dyno about the same, the C6 Z06 would have about 100 more RWTQ and weight over ONE THOUSAND POUNDS less. What makes you think it would even be close? I know you like to start **** over here but this one is just stupid. I guess your saying the M6 is as fast as the Ford GT too huh.
ITs not over a 1000 lb's, more like 4-500 lbs(click the link above 3769). Show me where torque has become a factor in a race, just one. Do you think your car would be faster with 800hp and 600ftlb of torque or 600hp and 800ftlb of torque.
You didnt install your nitrous setup to make more torque, you did it for the hp. Im pretty sure there isnt a 100ftlb jet.
#15
Originally Posted by 25psi
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...f01f985487.htm
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...b320d73f34.htm
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...a82661c2ec.htm
These machines are fast as hell. I would like to see one go head to head with a stock c6 z06.
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...b320d73f34.htm
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...a82661c2ec.htm
These machines are fast as hell. I would like to see one go head to head with a stock c6 z06.
#16
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sugarland Texas
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 25psi
ITs not over a 1000 lb's, more like 4-500 lbs(click the link above 3769). Show me where torque has become a factor in a race, just one. Do you think your car would be faster with 800hp and 600ftlb of torque or 600hp and 800ftlb of torque.
You didnt install your nitrous setup to make more torque, you did it for the hp. Im pretty sure there isnt a 100ftlb jet.
You didnt install your nitrous setup to make more torque, you did it for the hp. Im pretty sure there isnt a 100ftlb jet.
#17
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: htown
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sprayed1998
Ok it weights 3800 pounds, so assume 4000 even with a driver. So the Z06 has roughly a roughly 700-800 pound weight advantage and about 100ftlbs. The M6 would be a good run for a 450rwhp 03/04 cobra, lol.
Bmw weighed 3650
Your math skills are lacking here! Z06 with driver(est. 3300 lbs), M6 with driver(3800lbs) 500 or so difference.
The m6 would trounce a cobra, just like it did the porshe and 550hp mercedes.
#20
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sugarland Texas
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 25psi
Bmw weighed 3650
Your math skills are lacking here! Z06 with driver(est. 3300 lbs), M6 with driver(3800lbs) 500 or so difference.
The m6 would trounce a cobra, just like it did the porshe and 550hp mercedes.
Your math skills are lacking here! Z06 with driver(est. 3300 lbs), M6 with driver(3800lbs) 500 or so difference.
The m6 would trounce a cobra, just like it did the porshe and 550hp mercedes.