Actually You may need to learn how to read.....Read it again. He never said Rwhp or to the ground at all. Hence the reason I said something.....he cleared it up later.

 

Yeah, because that's what I have on mine.....sure. I'm actually on here a lot and don't troll......so why don't you just relax.

 

It always cracks me up when people quote hp/L likes it's some kind of "be all". I guess since trying to equate to hp/cubic inch results in such a small number is bad for some reason? Even funnier is people worshiping 62hp/L while only having 2 liters. Mmmmmm, k.....

Good joke for a thread!!!

 

300hp plus ish what FBODYs make on the dyno

220ish hp ish what 350Zs make on a dyno, use your brain

I corrected it for the newbs

 

Porsche TAG Formula F1 engine. 90cid, 1300-1400 bhp. So, 14-15bph/cid. Now what?

http://www.motorsportcollector.com/TAGEngine.html

 

you guys might like to read this thread.


http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=248343

 

Hey, one can do anything on 60+ pounds of overboost. But yes, that was an engineering marvel, especially for back then.

 

Classic!! Nothing like some unbiased opinions! I love the guys who say that Chevys are crap, Camaros can't turn (except to turn off the dragstrip), horrible reliability, and how they'd have to be offered cash on TOP of the SS. ROFLMAO! These are people who I guarantee have never even sat in a Camaro, let alone owned one. Personally, I think the 350Z is one of the UGLIEST cars ever created, and a rolling hunk of ****. But, that's just my opinion, doesn't make it a fact.

 

No you need to, he said DYNOED at 334 hp and Im pretty sure he didnt go through the time and expense of pulling his motor out of his car to put it on an engine dyno so Im pretty sure its safe to assume it was a chassis dyno and those are RWHP numbers.

 

Those guys are a bunch of ******* morons. Here's come exerpts, totally retarded:



If by barely you mean bus lengths.

He's gotta be on some kind of drugs.

All this coming from 350Z ricers, thinking Nissan is some kind of godly automaker. What a joke of a forum.

 

LOL, why do ya'll worry about 350s so much?

 

I like learning about different kinds of cars. It just amazes me how ignorant some people are. Thats why I posted the link. I bet the majority of these guys have never been in a camaro yet that talk all kinds of ****. I bet many of these guys would be surprised if they actually raced against a camaro on a road course or auto x.

 

Becuase lately Jkkstar, there have been multiple vids of 350z giving LS1's and 2's trouble and now they feel the need to defend there pride's . We already know that LS1's are faster, thats not what we're disputing.

 

We dont need to race or autocross in a camaro to realize, they're not meant to be on a road course. First of all, your car has a solid rear axle, which is not ideal for autocrossing. So this means that one wheel greatly affects the other, becuase the tire is always perpindicular to the axle. This alone causes great oversteer. This is not to say, you cant race your car on a track. It's to say, its not ideal for autocrossing.

 

Multiple videos?? Haha, not even a full bolt on 350Z will give an LS1 any trouble. They need a turbo just to hang with a bolt on LS1. An LS2 will give even a turbo'd 350Z a hard time, I don't know who you're trying to fool riceboy.

 

Show me one video of a turbo 350z losing to a bolt on ls1 or an ls2. I showed you already a gto ls2 having his *** handed to him by a bolt on 350z(without headers). The majority of turbo 350z run 115-120mph traps. Something a bolt on ls1 cant do. When adding a cam and heads, yes it is possible, but not a bolt on ls1.

 

My bolt-on T/A went multiple 115s. I'll have to check my old time slips for 116s. My friend(Demonicbird00 on here) went 117s and 118s in his bolt-on T/A. Trust me it's been done multiple times with bolt-ons.

Here's the stock internal list(bolt-ons) for this site. Just click on the stock internal list in the drop down menu. Pages of bolt-on cars running faster than 115 mph
https://ls1tech.com/forums/etdb.php

 

Hey man I'm the same way. I love to learn about any sort of car and stuff. I started getting attacked on here exactly for that reason. Now this thread is going to take a turn for the worst because there is **** talk going on between the cars. Lots of my friends have FRC vettes, SS's and stuff. I know about them and like to learn more about them. People will always be stubborn and thick headed though.

 

Hum talk to Sam Strano, and he will set you straight on that


Whats that other ooo so cool JDM car that is talked so highly about?


O Thats right its a AE86! Want to geuss what sus setup it has, hum..... SOILD AXEL!

So throw that idea out the window, Fbodies really are pretty good handling cars out of the box, there not 1970 Big Boxs......I dont get how Mustangs and Fbodies still get mixed up with older muscle cars and bad handling...

On a side note, Ive owned a AWD DSM with alot of sus mods and Ive driven quit a few Zs, and some MR2s,evos,wrxs blah blah

Fbodies arent really that bad...

 

You talk about trap speed, but what about 60 foot numbers and 1/4 mile times...........


FWD turbo Hondas trap pretty high but cant get the power down and put down bad 1/4 mile times