Lost to GTO :(
02-16-2007, 11:37 PM
#21
Originally Posted by Sprayed1998
103 is slow and 98 is pathetic slow. LS2 GTO's do 110+ all the time, stock. The sad part is 98 MPH is on the HIGH side of 94-98 Mustang GT's, Did you even break 400rwhp with the HCI/N20, lol.
02-17-2007, 12:19 AM
#25
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pittsburg, CA (Bay Area)
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
GTO's are slow, you should have done better. LT1's are also slow...
What were you thinking?.. Lol! Anyway, to the original poster, nice death. A respectable one too. Even stock, GTO's are quick.
02-17-2007, 01:25 AM
#27
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: West Pembroke Pines,Fl
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BLKWS.6
So, a 1-2 car loss 70-120 is normal for a stock M6 F-bod vs. stock M6 GTO?
02-17-2007, 02:51 AM
#28
Originally Posted by Slow Vette
it should of been dead even, no offense, but who would call a 70-120 roll, a race? u guys must of gone from 3rd to 4th gear.
Traffic sucked. Dead even? With him haveing a supposed 50whp advantage and better gearing??
02-17-2007, 07:27 AM
#29
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by slick1851
I know somone who went 13.0 in a 6.0 GTO......
People who say there slow are kinda retared, the same people also put down lt1s..
People who say there slow are kinda retared, the same people also put down lt1s..
Hell, he has beaten stock 6.0L GTOs in his car. Probably a freak.
02-17-2007, 02:44 PM
#30
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: West Pembroke Pines,Fl
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BLKWS.6
Traffic sucked. Dead even? With him haveing a supposed 50whp advantage and better gearing??
02-17-2007, 02:59 PM
#32
Originally Posted by Sprayed1998
103 is slow and 98 is pathetic slow. LS2 GTO's do 110+ all the time, stock. The sad part is 98 MPH is on the HIGH side of 94-98 Mustang GT's, Did you even break 400rwhp with the HCI/N20, lol.
And my HCI setup is mild seeing as how the block splits around 500rwhp so no need to make a wild motor in a limited block. But to answer your question, yes it makes over 400rwhp on the juice.
Originally Posted by Sprayed1998
1999 Black SS T-Tops/6-Speed - TSP Torquer V2 Cam / Pacesetter Longtubes / TSP 3" ORY / Borla Cat-Back / Lid / K&N / Smooth Bellow / Ported TB (ICON) / Pro 5.0 / 4.10 Gears / SLP Subframes / Hotchkins STB / Pro-Kit / NX Twin Nozzle / 17x11 Chrome ZR1 / 315 BFG Drags
12 Second Club
12 Second Club
02-17-2007, 07:45 PM
#36
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: West Pembroke Pines,Fl
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by necrocannibal
Come on now. If you dont think a GTO is an all around nicer car than an f body your an idiot. 
02-17-2007, 08:34 PM
#37
Originally Posted by Slow Vette
only on the inside, but if you think an f body isn't nicer on the outside then your the idiot...
Nowhere in anyones statemnets did they say that an f body looks better than a GTO, just that a GTO is a nicer car which it is. Looks on the other hand are subjective. While I like the way f bodies look for certain reasons I also like the way a GTO ooks for certain reasons. The GTOs have grown on me.
02-17-2007, 08:36 PM
#38
Banned
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft Hood, TX
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Slow Vette
only on the inside, but if you think an f body isn't nicer on the outside then your the idiot...
02-17-2007, 09:06 PM
#40
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BayAreaSS
Your car is running fine.
oh btw......camaros look way better than GTO's on the exterior
oh btw......camaros look way better than GTO's on the exterior
I am not very wild on the f-body styling myself although I really dig the SS Z28's look with decent wheels and a drop.