this is how sad mustangs are!
#161
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unit213
I like to go from a dig thanks.
...and I'm not afraid to take a loss. I know my **** isn't fast.
That's the difference between me and a lot of the babblers here.
They honestly believe their 12 second cars are fast. Of course,
that doesn't apply to the vast majority of the guys here.
I sure hope by this post you meant that your cars runs 9's.
I would assume that a 40xcid solid roller makes about 540rwhp. Throw
a dual stage kit on it and it could be nasty.
Let's see some pics of that beast.
...and I'm not afraid to take a loss. I know my **** isn't fast.
That's the difference between me and a lot of the babblers here.
They honestly believe their 12 second cars are fast. Of course,
that doesn't apply to the vast majority of the guys here.
I sure hope by this post you meant that your cars runs 9's.
I would assume that a 40xcid solid roller makes about 540rwhp. Throw
a dual stage kit on it and it could be nasty.
Let's see some pics of that beast.
#1..it doesnt run tens, thats what i said
#2..i love digs, throw some track bite down, ill mount the dr's and we'll do it to it
#3..2 plates, 150 per kit, it's mildly nasty
#4..im in total agreement with you on the fact that there is somebody always faster, i got into with a guy back home with a 10.5" outlaw car at a meet, total sleeper, and i lost a **** ton of money and pride. ive got a few pics of some good stuff, however id rather email them instead of posting for all of orlando to see and start throwing bottles in, pm me email?
#162
Hey unit I would love to see some vids of your Cobra be it dyno drag vids of your car I know i'm off topic but if you have some post them.
Originally Posted by unit213
I like to go from a dig thanks.
...and I'm not afraid to take a loss. I know my **** isn't fast.
That's the difference between me and a lot of the babblers here.
They honestly believe their 12 second cars are fast. Of course,
that doesn't apply to the vast majority of the guys here.
I sure hope by this post you meant that your cars runs 9's.
I would assume that a 40xcid solid roller makes about 540rwhp. Throw
a dual stage kit on it and it could be nasty.
Let's see some pics of that beast.
...and I'm not afraid to take a loss. I know my **** isn't fast.
That's the difference between me and a lot of the babblers here.
They honestly believe their 12 second cars are fast. Of course,
that doesn't apply to the vast majority of the guys here.
I sure hope by this post you meant that your cars runs 9's.
I would assume that a 40xcid solid roller makes about 540rwhp. Throw
a dual stage kit on it and it could be nasty.
Let's see some pics of that beast.
#164
Administrator
Originally Posted by kennyxg
Hey unit I would love to see some vids of your Cobra be it dyno drag vids of your car I know i'm off topic but if you have some post them.
to work. There's a dyno vid in my sig.
http://video.ls1tech.com/video/B1026...ECD877516F.htm
#165
Originally Posted by FoxNotch
good arguement.
There were these years, called 1979-1992, you know, the years that revived the camaro/mustang rivalry. Just so happened that mustangs had a strong edge there. But yea, good point.
There were these years, called 1979-1992, you know, the years that revived the camaro/mustang rivalry. Just so happened that mustangs had a strong edge there. But yea, good point.
That is an interesting fact also,back in the 80's and early 90's Mustang did seem to have the edge in performance.
#166
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GTO JIMMY
Am I really the first to catch this post? After reading 8 pages of mustang>LS1 I was really wondering what to post when I came across this little gem of a post.
A STOCK 03 GT will dyno what?
#169
Originally Posted by lovescamaros28
One serious fact is,Mustang owners did not have anything to brag about or fall back on when arguing what is faster between a factory Camaro and a Mustang.That was until 2003 when the AA Cobra was introduced.A year after the Camaro was discontinued.Year by year comparisons the Camaro z28/SS spanks the Cobra/GT/.In addition,there are a lot more ls1 owners on ls1tech.com than Mustang owners but just as much Mustang owners in this particular forum.They like to talk trash,and they get very curious about what ls1 owners are posting in here.Most LS1 owners post in the technical forums of www.ls1tech.com.
I like camaro's and TA's....I am just sick of all the serious smack talk when there are plus and minus's to both sides....it truely comes down to personal preference.
#170
Launching!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Charlie Town, WV
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lovescamaros28
Year by year comparisons the Camaro z28/SS spanks the Cobra/GT/.
Wrong,
1987 and 1992 for two examples when the stangs were faster stock in the 1/4
And thats pre term era
Ken
#171
Originally Posted by kens03cobra
And thats pre term era
Ken
Ken
#172
Launching!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Charlie Town, WV
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by aaron653
well since there wasn't an 03 f-body or an 02 term...I would guess(just guessing here) that your statement is irrelevant.............nice cars/truck btw
Thanks, but why do you say irrelevant?
He said year for year the maros were faster, I simply stated two years where that is not true.
Ken
#173
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ponygt65
Z and SS were driver's race with Cobra (01/99-post fix). Granted that was only two years, but still. Also the ET's were pretty close through alot of years even with the power difference (aside from the 94-98 yrs). Don't forget, even with the more power that camaro's had...the stangs always out sold them.
I like camaro's and TA's....I am just sick of all the serious smack talk when there are plus and minus's to both sides....it truely comes down to personal preference.
I like camaro's and TA's....I am just sick of all the serious smack talk when there are plus and minus's to both sides....it truely comes down to personal preference.
This is one of the best things to remember, I hate 350Z's but I can't say someone is a piece of **** because they picked one over an F-body. Everyone has there own reasons for buying the car, my friend with a crazy Terminator thinks the convertibles are for posers, thats his opinion and why he drives a coupe.
#174
Originally Posted by germeezy1
This is one of the best things to remember, I hate 350Z's but I can't say someone is a piece of **** because they picked one over an F-body. Everyone has there own reasons for buying the car, my friend with a crazy Terminator thinks the convertibles are for posers, thats his opinion and why he drives a coupe.
#175
Teching In
Originally Posted by lswon!!
a stock ls1 with a good driver can run high 12's to low 13's now mustangs STOCK cant run 12's and they might run a HIGH 13(your is a dohc so i dont know what you run) so so must are going to need somthing to run with them
#176
Banned
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft Hood, TX
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im not an expert about mustangs but I have learned a few things through experiance. (All my friends drive some sort of mustang) Stock for Stock:
LS1>GT mustang
LS1=Mach 1
LS1<Cobra
Hell thats even mod for mod. I dont like the 2v's, it takes a LOT to make them keep up for some strange reason. But I fully respect the 4v's in either form. I have been straight walked by mach 1's and cobra's in my GTO and in my 99 Z28 (low-mid 12's), but I can honestly say I cant ever recall losing to a GT.
Bone stock I put about 5 on my buddy in his 03 GT w/ full exhaust (LT's O/R Mids), an intake, and a diablo sport.
LS1>GT mustang
LS1=Mach 1
LS1<Cobra
Hell thats even mod for mod. I dont like the 2v's, it takes a LOT to make them keep up for some strange reason. But I fully respect the 4v's in either form. I have been straight walked by mach 1's and cobra's in my GTO and in my 99 Z28 (low-mid 12's), but I can honestly say I cant ever recall losing to a GT.
Bone stock I put about 5 on my buddy in his 03 GT w/ full exhaust (LT's O/R Mids), an intake, and a diablo sport.
#177
TECH Addict
iTrader: (30)
Originally Posted by ponygt65
Z and SS were driver's race with Cobra (01/99-post fix). Granted that was only two years, but still. Also the ET's were pretty close through alot of years even with the power difference (aside from the 94-98 yrs). Don't forget, even with the more power that camaro's had...the stangs always out sold them.
I like camaro's and TA's....I am just sick of all the serious smack talk when there are plus and minus's to both sides....it truely comes down to personal preference.
I like camaro's and TA's....I am just sick of all the serious smack talk when there are plus and minus's to both sides....it truely comes down to personal preference.
#178
Originally Posted by tspence45
A 99, 01, and 02 Cobra are high 13 second cars. Whereas an LS1 is a mid to low 13 second car and some can even dip into 12's. I like Cobras but an LS1 is faster.
I'm sorry..I believe I said you shouldn't talk about mustangs if you dont' know crap about them......new edge N/A cobra's are mid to low 13s.
BTW - There is NO SUCH THING AS A 2002 Cobra........
#180
That car looks like it's a beast I would like to see some numbers though.
Originally Posted by unit213
I'll have to upload some track vids. No time now since I'm heading off
to work. There's a dyno vid in my sig.
http://video.ls1tech.com/video/B1026...ECD877516F.htm
to work. There's a dyno vid in my sig.
http://video.ls1tech.com/video/B1026...ECD877516F.htm