Raced a New Mustang with Roush blower
05-24-2007, 09:26 PM
#125
Tech Resident
Originally Posted by 04Terminator
You like to argue huh? I was just stating some facts, not quoting magazines...my posts were my own words based on my opwn experience. I was just saying that the "fat heavy pigs" move out pretty damn well and do better than anticipated on road courses. Information for the thread...not directed at you. I doubt you knew these FACTS based on your close-minded bias that is reflected in your posts. 
Originally Posted by 04Terminator
Yet another case of rectal-cranial inversion. 
05-24-2007, 10:09 PM
#127
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Local-heretic
I may be drunk right now, but even if i was sober Id still say the same ****. 2V Mustangs are ok with me, but not in the same league as LS1's. I don't know what the problem is... 
05-24-2007, 10:09 PM
#128
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GTOpowered240sx
Badass kill!
Thread sucked though due to the ignoramusses that mistake thier opinion as fact and then actually treat it as such.
Thread sucked though due to the ignoramusses that mistake thier opinion as fact and then actually treat it as such.
05-24-2007, 10:28 PM
#129
Tech Resident
Originally Posted by ponygt65
how could you make fun of ChocoTaco like that?....Oh wait, what you stated is fact...and treating it as such.
that's as basic as you get on an LS1 site. then again, when you only hang in the **** talking forum, i guess you'll never learn anything.and LS1's far FAR greater than the 2V's, 3V's and 4V's. the sooner you accept this, the sooner you can deny ignorance. and don't even give me the terminator bullshit. procharge an LS1 and run it on the same psi. i'm willing to bet it'll make just as much power if not more, assuming it can handle the boost (nothing forged internals can't fix).
before you mouth off with the whole name-calling thing, i suggest you remember you're on an LS1 site. i know quite a bit more than you around these parts, along with nearly everyone else in this thread, even the mustang guys. quoting magazine stats doesn't make you knowledgeable. remember that.
05-24-2007, 10:29 PM
#130
Teching In
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: north georgia
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=ChocoTaco369]what he hell are you talking about? ANYTHING can be made fast with enough power. from the factory, stock GT's still get their *** whopped my 10 year old f-bodies. 10 year old cam only f-bodies whoop the **** out of new FI GT's. that's pretty sad. that's ford engineering. yea, you can make a mustang fast. guess what, i could put a jet engine on a riding lawn mower and be faster than you. you can do anything with money. it's really not that impressive - just like the new GT's - not impressive at all.
i havent had any 10 yr 0ld cam only f-bodies whoop the **** out of my FI new GT. i guess i got one of the special ones without ford engineering
not dissn. the ls1, its one of the baddest motors ever made, and it can be made faster for cheaper but no need to over exgerate. but i can see cam only ls1s whoopin a good bit of fi 2v GT
i havent had any 10 yr 0ld cam only f-bodies whoop the **** out of my FI new GT. i guess i got one of the special ones without ford engineering
not dissn. the ls1, its one of the baddest motors ever made, and it can be made faster for cheaper but no need to over exgerate. but i can see cam only ls1s whoopin a good bit of fi 2v GT
05-24-2007, 10:50 PM
#131
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
i'll try to see it from your eyes:
i drive a mustang. i'm a huge mustang fan. i have been for years. the mustang's #1 rival throughout history has been the f-body. i'm seeing a new mustang using forced induction get whooped on by a cam-only, stock cubed, naturally aspirated f-body using an engine design 10 years older than the new mustang's. i feel very threatened because it is a clear victory, so i'm going to come up with whatever exceptions to the rule, random unrelated scenarios and magazine numbers that help make the mustang look better not only to just defend a random mustang, but for my own benefit. maybe i'll start a little conflict on an LS1-based site i'm trolling to get my rocks off while i'm at it.
am i close?
i drive a mustang. i'm a huge mustang fan. i have been for years. the mustang's #1 rival throughout history has been the f-body. i'm seeing a new mustang using forced induction get whooped on by a cam-only, stock cubed, naturally aspirated f-body using an engine design 10 years older than the new mustang's. i feel very threatened because it is a clear victory, so i'm going to come up with whatever exceptions to the rule, random unrelated scenarios and magazine numbers that help make the mustang look better not only to just defend a random mustang, but for my own benefit. maybe i'll start a little conflict on an LS1-based site i'm trolling to get my rocks off while i'm at it.
am i close?
classic
05-24-2007, 10:53 PM
#132
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Macon, Ga
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ponygt65
how could you make fun of ChocoTaco like that?....Oh wait, what you stated is fact...and treating it as such.
****!!!
05-24-2007, 11:23 PM
#134
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ls1
Originally Posted by brian06eleanor
are you sayin the stang or the ls1 should be 450+ and as for the arguement about s197 weight mine weighs 3900 without me in it lol
05-25-2007, 03:44 AM
#137
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
what he hell are you talking about? ANYTHING can be made fast with enough power. from the factory, stock GT's still get their *** whopped my 10 year old f-bodies. 10 year old cam only f-bodies whoop the **** out of new FI GT's. that's pretty sad. that's ford engineering. yea, you can make a mustang fast. guess what, i could put a jet engine on a riding lawn mower and be faster than you. you can do anything with money. it's really not that impressive - just like the new GT's - not impressive at all.
if you want to see people with their heads up their asses, i suggest you check out www.svtperformance.com/ nearly everyone on that site has their head up their *** to some degree. i bet you're a member
if you want to see people with their heads up their asses, i suggest you check out www.svtperformance.com/ nearly everyone on that site has their head up their *** to some degree. i bet you're a member
05-25-2007, 04:40 AM
#138
What time are you talking about that a bolt-on 2V GT can hit. Are you talking a bolt-on 2V GT that can run as fast as a cammed LS1. No offense but if you find one I'd like to see it unless maybe your talking about it going against an LT1. But I think fords technology is good hell look they take smaller cube motors and make insane horsepower even though they're supercharged. Hell I'd love to own a GT500 and put a kenne bell or whipple supercharger on it and be able to make over 800rwhp.
05-25-2007, 12:49 PM
#139
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Western Section
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Yeah, but you're running a time that a bolt-on 2V GT can easily hit...
05-25-2007, 02:10 PM
#140
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're gonna have to excuse that post guys... I was WASTED when I wrote that this morning
Edit: But there are bolt-on/geared 2Vs in the 12s, so I think it still holds true unless he lives in Colorado or somewhere like that.
Edit: But there are bolt-on/geared 2Vs in the 12s, so I think it still holds true unless he lives in Colorado or somewhere like that.