Raced a 98 Mustang GT ... was suprised
07-14-2007, 08:09 PM
#41
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 99RebelZ28
If I had a gt I would definitely be saving up for a supercharger because a bolt on gt still gets beat by a stock ls1. My buddy had full bolt ons plus cams and he still only made 282 rwhp although it was on a mustang dyno....but still. He would be at my rear bumper up until about 110 where we usually shut down. He had 3.73s and nittos, so he would get my off the line but I always caught him.
btw this is when my car had a catback and the k&n fipk
btw this is when my car had a catback and the k&n fipk
07-15-2007, 09:14 AM
#42
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Irunelevens
It all depends on what you do, though I do agree that forced induction/nitrous is the best route with the 2v 4.6s. It is VERY possible to get a bolt-on/geared GT into the 12s, but mid 12s at best.
You better be hittin some hella 60' times. I don't see them in the mid 12's otherwise. They only trap in the high 90's stock don't they?
I actually beat a 99-04 gt in my Third gen a few years back, when i was a bolt-on L98, pulled him outta the hole til about 60 then it evened out but he was already a couple cars back and never caught up.
07-15-2007, 03:41 PM
#43
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kyle91z28
You better be hittin some hella 60' times. I don't see them in the mid 12's otherwise. They only trap in the high 90's stock don't they?
I actually beat a 99-04 gt in my Third gen a few years back, when i was a bolt-on L98, pulled him outta the hole til about 60 then it evened out but he was already a couple cars back and never caught up.
I actually beat a 99-04 gt in my Third gen a few years back, when i was a bolt-on L98, pulled him outta the hole til about 60 then it evened out but he was already a couple cars back and never caught up.
07-15-2007, 10:48 PM
#44
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Weezieanna
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, just bought a new (to me) 02 GT M5...I was in the 13.3 area with just 4.10's and dr's(dumping @ 5500). With a tune and full exhaust minus headers, I went 12.98@103, Three weeks ago. I will be doing the intake from air filter to the lower intake later this year. I just dont see how you need that much HP to rin in the 12's. Theoretically 250RWHP with the gvw that a mustang has is good for 12's
07-16-2007, 04:10 AM
#45
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah... there's a guy on another forum I'm on that has MAYBE 250rwhp (H-pipe, exhaust, K&N) and 4.10s that ran a 13.1 @ 104mph. And he's on regular tires. It might not be common, but it is possible.
07-16-2007, 06:01 PM
#47
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kyle91z28
**** mustang gt's, they are slow and a waste of tiem to mod...and i am talking **** cuz im a ******* joke *** drunk
- that about sum it up?...LOL 