Grand Prix GT(Modded) vs a 07 Shelby GT500
08-02-2007 | 06:38 PM
#22
Teching In
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area!!!!
Originally Posted by ponygt65
Wow...I see us 'stang guys' still have a lot of work to do here..LOL
Nice runs
Nice runs
and by the way poeple are posting you would swear the grand prix won or something.....in every race it had multiple car lengths put on it...but it did do good for a big heavy front wheel drive car...
and last i checked a c6 dosnt "rip the the gt500 a new whole" but the c6 z06 dose
08-02-2007 | 10:17 PM
#23
Originally Posted by brian06eleanor
when i only had full exhaust underdrive pullys and a tune i made 310rwhp 320 rwtq, with 3.90 gears so id say it doesent take that many bolt-ons
and you still didn't have 320hp, although close.
08-03-2007 | 12:47 AM
#26
Originally Posted by 2K1WS6TA
I am mainly speaking in terms of money. If I priced out every bolt'on mod you had it would probably be in the neighborhood of $1,200.....? close?
and you still didn't have 320hp, although close.
and you still didn't have 320hp, although close.
08-03-2007 | 07:47 AM
#27
Why are all you guys comparing hp? It doesn't matter what it takes to get a gt to 320rwhp because it would still be in the low 13s to high 12s. The GP runs 12.4s and the car he ran looked to be a good 1-2 tenths faster. People on the internet are way to concerned with hp numbers when really all that matters when your racing is et.
Anyway, nice video and death. That little grand prix put up quite a fight, cool car to have if you like to race for money.
Anyway, nice video and death. That little grand prix put up quite a fight, cool car to have if you like to race for money.
08-03-2007 | 12:31 PM
#28
TECH Apprentice
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by rufretic
Why are all you guys comparing hp? It doesn't matter what it takes to get a gt to 320rwhp because it would still be in the low 13s to high 12s. The GP runs 12.4s and the car he ran looked to be a good 1-2 tenths faster. People on the internet are way to concerned with hp numbers when really all that matters when your racing is et.
Anyway, nice video and death. That little grand prix put up quite a fight, cool car to have if you like to race for money.
Anyway, nice video and death. That little grand prix put up quite a fight, cool car to have if you like to race for money.
08-03-2007 | 02:00 PM
#29
***Repost Police***
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by rufretic
Why are all you guys comparing hp? It doesn't matter what it takes to get a gt to 320rwhp because it would still be in the low 13s to high 12s. The GP runs 12.4s and the car he ran looked to be a good 1-2 tenths faster. People on the internet are way to concerned with hp numbers when really all that matters when your racing is et.
Anyway, nice video and death. That little grand prix put up quite a fight, cool car to have if you like to race for money.
Anyway, nice video and death. That little grand prix put up quite a fight, cool car to have if you like to race for money.
08-04-2007 | 07:21 PM
#31
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
From: crossett, Arkansas
well the fact is. the GP owner said it was a GT 500. and the chances of a fairly modded GP GT and a GT 500 running in a race probly doesnt happen to often.
on a track that GP 9-10 times would probly win. vs a GT 500. they seem to be more 12.5 to 12.7 range. and the GP being the auto as long as it gets grip off the line nothign else to worry about.
GP HAVE some of the Worst Top end. they can rip alot of cars in the 1/4. but form a roll will lose. they hit their powerband really quick but lose it quick also.
on a track that GP 9-10 times would probly win. vs a GT 500. they seem to be more 12.5 to 12.7 range. and the GP being the auto as long as it gets grip off the line nothign else to worry about.
GP HAVE some of the Worst Top end. they can rip alot of cars in the 1/4. but form a roll will lose. they hit their powerband really quick but lose it quick also.
