04Terminator

Alot of difference? The Gt40 heads mainly which upped the bhp from around 220 to around 240 stock.

You'd be real lucky to make 400 RWHP on the STOCK cobra motor with a T-trim or the like. I've seen built 331s with S-trim, AFR or TF heads, cam, CAI that only made 470/490 at 9psi...granted there was room for a little improvement on the tune.

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

There is a big difference in the motors. Everything with those cars (94-95s) are in the tune. Like I said bolt on 302 Cobras with a tune are around 270rwhp310rwtq.

04Terminator

Ok. I guess I need an edumacation. What are the differences in the cobra 5.0 and the GT 5.0 other than the GT40 heads?

Can you show me an S/C 94 or 95 cobra with a supercharger only and supporting tune making 400 whp? No offense, I guess I'm just ignorant.

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

There was the Cobra intake, cam was different, 1.7RRs, GT40 heads, and I think thats it. I'll try to find a Cobra with only a S/Cer for you.

TXFORMULA

im talking about the 2v 4.6l's. the throttle body doesnt face forward and they do have some intake noise with a decent filter-atleast mine did.it actually sounded cool. if you look in some mustang magazines you will find pages of body kits and aftermarket hoods...well they make ram air hoods as well as air boxes to make them functional

Socalmach

Good kill.

MonmouthCtyLS7

iTrader: (6)

Thats interesting, ive seen several auto LS1's run deep in the low 13's stock...i guess thats a dog nowadays...95 GT's were definately faster then that

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

I'd definately like to see a stock auto LS1 run low 13's. (meaning IMO 13.3-13.0)

Assman

iTrader: (2)

Hell i'd like to see a stock 5.0 run low 14's! But somehow you still said that the cobra must have been stock...lol.

I'm sure there's plenty of people that hit 500 on a stock block....for a couple of dyno pulls till it blows!

rubber duck

iTrader: (7)

If you're talking stock untouched gt-40 iron heads, stock untouched intake, and stock cam you're not getting to the half century mark, you can only push so much air through that setup, and it's not enough to make 500, in fact, you'd need a good tune to break 400 rwhp.

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

That definately won't happen.

fast

iTrader: (24)

94 GT, 306, vortech s-trim @ 13psi(or so), trick flow heads, old vortech intake, afm B31 cam, other usual stuff, M5, tuned @ Anderson Ford . . . 522 rwhp . . . long way from stock (where it was upper 400s iirc)

MUSTANGBRKR02

iTrader: (91)

i have a vert t/a with exhaust and airlid to a 12.9@108 2.08 60' on 18" street tires.

99T-Top Z28

That is pretty nice on a F-Body, and with a crappy 60' you should be able to hit mid 12s on DRs pretty easy.

Irunelevens

Mine does.

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

So your T/A vert automatic runs 12.9@108mph with the only mods being exhaust and airlid? Pass what you're smoking.

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

My friend said from the passenger seat my car sounded like a BOV everytime I shifted when I was n/a. I couldn't hear it and it definately never whistled!

Wants an LS1

94-95 cobras come with 1.7 RR stock, i know because when i took my head cover off i was QUITE surprised to see a brand name company whos name i cant remember (crane cams?) under the thing, then found out that they came on them stock over at SVTP.com. Its because the 94-95 cobras had a diffrent cam that ackwardly enough was LESS aggressive then a 94-95 GT.....damn i miss my old 94 cobra.

Wants an LS1

PM me for better stuff

Bob Cosby

I'd like to see a 'bolt-on' 94/95 Cobra make 270-290 RWHP. From the factory, they are ~210 RWHP - so that's quite a jump.

Please post the evidence.

Thanks.
Bob