stock z28 vs mild bolt on 05-07 gt
#82
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by T-56SLPSS
They both ran 14.2's but the mustang had a better reaction time. It was hard to tell with quiet exhaust but it sounded more agressive at higher rpms than the average 5.0, with a small cam type sound at idel. The pullys were light weight, im assuming smaller also, a differance that was probly not noticed but still there.
#84
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 88blackgt
not unreasonable for a stock fox to run a 14.2. and stock, foxes are actually very quiet. heard a few low mileage, bone stock foxes, and they are actually not loud at all
#88
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by T-56SLPSS
They both ran 14.2's but the mustang had a better reaction time. It was hard to tell with quiet exhaust but it sounded more agressive at higher rpms than the average 5.0, with a small cam type sound at idel. The pullys were light weight, im assuming smaller also, a differance that was probly not noticed but still there.
#91
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by T-56SLPSS
(or lack thereof) is that all you can say. How did you like my track times? Impressive for a mild bolt on ss
![The Judge](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_judge.gif)