2001 Camaro VS 2003 Carrera
#7
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
6 Posts
oo yea if we were up in the mountains or something he would have me but camaro still does pretty good for stock suspension n all. but im sure not as good as a porsche
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cent. FL
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those cars weighs a little than 3k lbs and put out 320hp. 0-60 is under 5 seconds and the 1/4 is in the low 13's. They are really quick off the line especially the 4 wheel drive. I raced a 996 4S before(97-04) with a nearly bone stock automatic LT1 Vette I had...he pulled me from the stoplight, but from a 50+ highway blast....I had a car or 2 on him...oh and they were about $90k new.
#9
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
6 Posts
yea why spend so much when you can get a WAY cheaper car thats is faster... (well maybe not top speed but yea). i was lookin at motortrend on the specs and its about 315 hp and 273 lb torque
#15
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He spent 80K because the seats cost more than your car, not because it was faster. That is just what Porsche owners do. I don't fault them for it. Good kill though, especially with a couple fatass tagalongs.
#16
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
6 Posts
hahah thanks. yea i mean if i had that kind of money i would buy 1. we were talking about it later and i was like "dude you got beat by me and i had a 175,220,225 pound person in it". his response was "well i had golf clubs and all that in it" haha were going to go again soon and get some vids.